Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 04, 2026
Application No. 18/572,980

Capillary Blood Collection Device

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Dec 21, 2023
Priority
Jun 29, 2021 — provisional 63/216,245 +2 more
Examiner
NATNITHITHADHA, NAVIN
Art Unit
3791
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
BECTON, DICKINSON AND COMPANY
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
71%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 4m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 71% — above average
71%
Career Allowance Rate
686 granted / 964 resolved
+1.2% vs TC avg
Strong +31% interview lift
Without
With
+31.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 9m
Avg Prosecution
44 currently pending
Career history
1008
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
12.6%
-27.4% vs TC avg
§103
30.9%
-9.1% vs TC avg
§102
29.1%
-10.9% vs TC avg
§112
17.0%
-23.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 964 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status 1. The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restriction 2. Claims 7-15 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b), as being drawn to a nonelected invention, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Applicant timely traversed the restriction (election) requirement in the reply filed on 20 February 2026. Applicant's election with traverse of Group I, claims 1-6, in the reply filed on 20 February 2026 is acknowledged. The traversal is on the ground(s) that: Using the same criteria as 37 C.F.R. § 1.475, the International Searching Authority, conducting a search on the corresponding set of claims, found unity of invention to be present in the international application. Further, the results from a search for one or more groups will necessarily produce results applicable for examination of the other groups, as each of Groups I, II, and III are directed to a device for obtaining a blood sample comprising a holder for receiving a sample source, the holder having an actuation portion and a port, and a lancet or blood collector attachment removably connected to the holder. Accordingly, results from a search for any group will necessarily produce results applicable for examination of the other groups. This is not found persuasive because Group I, Group II, and Group III do not share the same or corresponding technical feature. Group I is directed to a device for obtaining a blood sample including a collection container comprising at least one fill line provided on a surface of the collection container, whereas Group II is direct to a device for obtaining a blood sample including a blood collector attachment includes a flash chamber to indicate when the blood sample has been drawn from a patient’s finger held in the holder, and whereas Group III is directed to a device for obtaining a blood sample including a label positioned on the collection container is oriented so as to obstruct a patient’s view of an inner cavity of the collection container. Furthermore, a search for any of the groups would necessarily produce results that would be different from the other groups. A different field of search (for example, searching different classes/subclasses or electronic resources, or employing different search queries) would have to be performed for each of the groups. The prior art applicable to one group would not likely be applicable to another group. The groups are likely to raise different non-prior art issues under 35 U.S.C. 101 and/or 35 U.S.C. 112. The requirement is still deemed proper and is therefore made FINAL. Claim Objections 3. Claim 1 is objected to because of the following informalities: In line 6, “the container” lacks proper antecedent basis, and should be amended to “the collection container”. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 4. In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. 5. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. 6. Claims 1-3 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Ivosevic et al., U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2019/0216380 A1 (“Ivosevic”). As to Claim 1, Ivosevic teaches the following: A device (“device”) 10 for obtaining a blood sample (“blood sample”) 18 (see “The present disclosure relates generally to a device for obtaining a biological sample.” in para. [0002]; and see figs. 8, 14, 15, and 23-26), the device 10 comprising: a holder (“holder”) 12 for receiving a sample source (“sample source, e.g., a finger”) 19 (see “Referring to FIGS. 1-7B, exemplary embodiments of holders 12 of the present disclosure that are able to receive a sample source, e.g., a finger 19, for supplying a biological sample, such as a blood sample 18.” in para. [0060]), the holder 12 having an actuation portion (“actuation portion”) 24 and a port (“port”) 26 (see “A holder 12 of the present disclosure generally includes a finger receiving portion 20 having a first opening 22 (FIG. 5), an actuation portion 24, a port 26 having a second opening 28, …” in para. [0060]); a blood collector attachment (“lancet housing”) 14 removably connected to the holder 12 (see “Referring to FIGS. 8-10, in one embodiment, with the holder 12 and the lancet housing 14 being separate components, the lancet housing 14 is removably connectable to the port 26 of the holder 12.” in para. [0074]); and a collection container (“collection container”) 16 removably connectable to the blood collector attachment 14 (see “Referring to FIG. 26, once a desired amount of blood 18 is collected within the container 16, a blood collector portion 74 is detached from the collection device 200 and sealed with cap or septum 76 to send a collected sample 18 to a diagnostic instrument and/or testing device. As discussed above, the collection container 16 may also contain a sample stabilizer, e.g., an anticoagulant, to stabilize blood and fill lines to indicate/meter a collected volume of blood 18.” in para. [0110]), the [collection] container 16 defining a collection cavity (“collection cavity”) 70 (see “The collection container 16 defines a collection cavity 70 for receiving a blood sample 18, …” in para. [0080]), and the collection container 16 comprising at least one fill line (“at least one fill line(s)”, not labeled) provided on a surface of the collection container (see “The collection container 16 may also include at least one fill line(s) corresponding to a predetermined volume of sample.” in para. [0092]; and see fig. 8). As to Claim 2, Ivosevic teaches the following: wherein the at least one fill line is configured to indicate when a predetermined volume of the blood sample 18 has been filled in the collection container 16 (see “The collection container 16 may also include at least one fill line(s) corresponding to a predetermined volume of sample.” in para. [0092]; and see fig. 8). As to Claim 3, Ivosevic teaches the following: wherein the collection container 16 comprises two fill lines provided on the surface of the collection container 16 (see “The collection container 16 may also include at least one fill line(s) corresponding to a predetermined volume of sample.” in para. [0092]; and see fig. 8). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 7. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. 8. This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the later invention in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art against the later invention. 9. Claims 4-6 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Ivosevic, as applied to claim 1 above, and further in view of Wilkinson et al., U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2011/0178424 A1 (“Wilkinson”). As to Claim 4, Ivosevic teaches the subject matter of claim 1 above. Ivosevic does not teach the following: wherein the at least one fill line of the collection container is color coded. However, Wilkinson teaches the following: wherein the at least one fill line (“transitional fill-volume indicator”) 30 of the collection container (“specimen collection container”) 10 is color coded (“first colored portion 38” and “second colored portion 40”) (see “The transitional fill-volume indicator 30 may also include a first colored portion 38 and at least a portion of the sidewall 16 of the specimen collection container 10 includes a second colored portion 40, with the second colored portion 40 being different than the first colored portion 38. For example, the transitional fill-volume indicator 30 may be a colored band circumferentially extending about the sidewall 16. The sidewall 16 may be a clear or other colored appearance or portion adjacent the transitional fill-volume indicator 30. In another embodiment, the specimen collection container 10 may include a color contrast or visual effects contrast between at least a portion of the transitional fill-volume indicator 30 and at least a portion of the sidewall 16 of the specimen collection container 10. Examples of color contrasts may include contrasting color portions or variations in hue and/or intensity of the same color. Examples of visual effects contrasts may include the presence of a color modifier, such as pearlesence, sheen, metallicizers, and the like. In a further embodiment, the transitional fill-volume indicator 30 can be formed by spraying, stenciling, or otherwise applying the appropriate markings directly to a surface of the sidewall 16 of the specimen collection container 10, such as the outer surface 36 of the sidewall 16. The transitional fill-volume indicator 30 can also be formed by roughening or otherwise modifying a portion of the sidewall 16 of the specimen collection container 10 to impart a distinct visual appearance and/or texture as compared with an adjacent portion of the sidewall 16. For example, the transitional fill-volume indicator 30 may be formed by electrical discharge machining, etching, or other similar process to impart a textured appearance.” in para. [0083]). Thus, it would have been obvious for one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the present application was effectively filed to modify Ivosevic’s at least one fill line (“at least one fill line(s)”, not labeled) to be Wilkinson’s at least one fill line (“transitional fill-volume indicator 30”) that is color coded (“first colored portion 38” and “second colored portion 40”) because it is a simple substitution of one known feature, i.e. “at least one fill line(s)”, for another, i.e. “transitional fill-volume indicator 30” that includes “first colored portion 38” and “second colored portion 40”, to yield similar predictable results, i.e. to communicate the different fill-volumes required for manual and automatic sample extraction (see Wilkinson, para. [0007]). As to Claims 5 and 6, Ivosevic teaches the subject matter of claim 1 above. Ivosevic does not teach the following: wherein the at least one fill line of the collection container has a lighter shade of color; and wherein the at least one fill line of the collection container has a darker shade of color. However, Wilkinson teaches the following: at least one fill line (“transitional fill-volume indicator”) 30 of the collection container (“specimen collection container”) 10 has a lighter shade of color or a darker shade of color (“color contrasts may include contrasting color portions or variations in hue and/or intensity of the same color”, not labeled) (see “The transitional fill-volume indicator 30 may also include a first colored portion 38 and at least a portion of the sidewall 16 of the specimen collection container 10 includes a second colored portion 40, with the second colored portion 40 being different than the first colored portion 38. For example, the transitional fill-volume indicator 30 may be a colored band circumferentially extending about the sidewall 16. The sidewall 16 may be a clear or other colored appearance or portion adjacent the transitional fill-volume indicator 30. In another embodiment, the specimen collection container 10 may include a color contrast or visual effects contrast between at least a portion of the transitional fill-volume indicator 30 and at least a portion of the sidewall 16 of the specimen collection container 10. Examples of color contrasts may include contrasting color portions or variations in hue and/or intensity of the same color. Examples of visual effects contrasts may include the presence of a color modifier, such as pearlesence, sheen, metallicizers, and the like. In a further embodiment, the transitional fill-volume indicator 30 can be formed by spraying, stenciling, or otherwise applying the appropriate markings directly to a surface of the sidewall 16 of the specimen collection container 10, such as the outer surface 36 of the sidewall 16. The transitional fill-volume indicator 30 can also be formed by roughening or otherwise modifying a portion of the sidewall 16 of the specimen collection container 10 to impart a distinct visual appearance and/or texture as compared with an adjacent portion of the sidewall 16. For example, the transitional fill-volume indicator 30 may be formed by electrical discharge machining, etching, or other similar process to impart a textured appearance.” in para. [0083]). Thus, it would have been obvious for one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the present application was effectively filed to modify Ivosevic’s at least one fill line (“at least one fill line(s)”, not labeled) to be Wilkinson’s at least one fill line (“transitional fill-volume indicator 30”) that is a lighter shade of color or a darker shade of color (“color contrasts may include contrasting color portions or variations in hue and/or intensity of the same color”) because it is a simple substitution of one known feature, i.e. “at least one fill line(s)”, for another, i.e. “transitional fill-volume indicator 30” that includes “color contrasts may include contrasting color portions or variations in hue and/or intensity of the same color”, to yield similar predictable results, i.e. to communicate the different fill-volumes required for manual and automatic sample extraction (see Wilkinson, para. [0007]). Conclusion 10. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to NAVIN NATNITHITHADHA whose telephone number is (571)272-4732. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 8:00 am - 8:00 am - 4:00 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jason M Sims can be reached at 571-272-7540. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /NAVIN NATNITHITHADHA/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3791 03/24/2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 21, 2023
Application Filed
Mar 24, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12611125
SENSOR INSERTION DEVICES AND METHODS OF USE
4y 4m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Patent 12605075
PHYSIOLOGICAL SENSOR DELIVERY DEVICE AND METHOD
5y 0m to grant Granted Apr 21, 2026
Patent 12569172
DEVICES, SYSTEMS, AND METHODS ASSOCIATED WITH ANALYTE MONITORING DEVICES AND DEVICES INCORPORATING THE SAME
3y 6m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12564329
Optical Device for Determining Pulse Rate
4y 6m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12562273
MEDICAL DEVICES AND METHODS
1y 4m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
71%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+31.0%)
3y 9m (~1y 4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 964 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month