Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026
Application No. 18/573,607

OPTICAL-FIBER CUTTING DEVICE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Dec 22, 2023
Priority
Jun 30, 2021 — JP 2021-108579 +1 more
Examiner
DONG, LIANG
Art Unit
3724
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Sumitomo Electric Industries, Ltd.
OA Round
4 (Non-Final)
53%
Grant Probability
Moderate
4-5
OA Rounds
2m
Est. Remaining
86%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 53% of resolved cases
53%
Career Allowance Rate
268 granted / 504 resolved
-16.8% vs TC avg
Strong +33% interview lift
Without
With
+32.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
66 currently pending
Career history
575
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
52.8%
+12.8% vs TC avg
§102
18.8%
-21.2% vs TC avg
§112
26.8%
-13.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 504 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Response to Amendment The Amendment filed 7/24/2026 has been entered. Claims 1-3 remain pending in the application. Claim 4 was cancelled. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-3 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Nakamura (US 20190049667 A1) in view of Sasaki (US 20180272552 A1). Regarding claims 1-3, Nakamura teaches an optical fiber cleaving apparatus for cleaving an optical fiber, the optical fiber cleaving apparatus comprising: a blade member (23) configured to damage the optical fiber; a base (3) movably supports the blade member in a predetermined direction; a slider (7) supported on the base, the slider being movable in the predetermined direction (see Figure 1); and a rotation mechanism (see Figure 4) configured to rotate the blade member by a predetermined angle each time the blade member damages the optical fiber (paragraph 0067), wherein the rotation mechanism includes a first gear having a plurality of first teeth (teeth on 25, see Figure 4), an abutting member (32) configured to abut against the first teeth of the first gear and rotating the first gear (see Figure 4), wherein the blade member or the abutting member is configured to move parallel to each other so that the abutting member abuts against the first teeth of the first gear and rotate the first gear by one tooth (see Figure 12ABCD), wherein the blade member is rotatably attached to the slider, wherein the abutting member is fixed to the base, and wherein the first gear is configured to abut against the abutting member during movement of the blade member together with the slider (paragraph 0067). Nakamura fails to teach wherein the predetermined angle is a numerical value that is not capable of dividing 360, wherein a quotient, which is a calculation result of dividing 360 by the value of the predetermined angle, is not an integer, a second gear that has a plurality of second teeth and that is rotatable integrally with the first gear, and a third gear that has a plurality of third teeth meshing with the second teeth of the second gear and that is rotatable integrally with the blade member, wherein the number of the first teeth is different from the number of the second teeth, and wherein the number of the first teeth and the number of the second teeth are smaller than the number of the third teeth, wherein the first gear and the second gear are coaxially rotatably attached to the slider by a screw passing through a center of a rotation shaft, and wherein the third gear and the blade member are coaxially rotatably attached to the slider by a screw passing through a center thereof (as required by claim 1), the predetermined angle is a prime number or a multiple of a prime number (as required by claim 2), the predetermined angle is a prime number (as required by claim 3). Sasaki teaches an optical fiber cleaving apparatus for cleaving an optical fiber, the optical fiber cleaving apparatus comprising: a blade member (13) configured to damage the optical fiber; and a rotation mechanism (assembly of 41 and 64) configured to rotate the blade member by a predetermined angle each time the blade member damages the optical fiber (unknown value of angle, see Figure 6 and paragraph 0126 and 0138-0139), the rotation mechanism includes a first gear (84B) having a plurality of first teeth, an abutting member (83) configured to abut against the first teeth of the first gear and rotating the first gear (see Figure 6), a second gear (84A) that has a plurality of second teeth and that is rotatable integrally with the first gear, and a third gear (81) that has a plurality of third teeth meshing with the second teeth of the second gear and that is rotatable integrally with the blade member (see Figure 6), the number of teeth for each gear is optionally selected (paragraphs 0124-0126), wherein the first gear and the second gear are coaxially rotatably attached to the slider by a screw (48) passing through a center of a rotation shaft (see Figure 4), and wherein the third gear and the blade member are coaxially rotatably attached to the slider (see Figure 4). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to modify the device of Nakamura to added the additional gear system into the device with the screw connection, taught by Sasaki, in order to achieve the desired rotation ratio wanted by the end user (paragraphs 0123-0126 of Sasaki). The resulting device of modified Nakamura teaches the original first gear 25 of Nakamura would become the third gear in the new system like 81 of Sakai and the abutting member 32 of Nakamura would engage with first gear of Sasaki like in Figure 4 of Nakamura, the first gear and the second gear are coaxially rotatably attached to the slider by a screw (48) passing through a center of a rotation shaft (see Figure 4). It also have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to modify the device of Nakamura to connect the third gear and the blade member coaxially rotatably attached to the slider by a screw passing through a center thereof, as taught by Sasaki, in order to provide a connection for the gears. Examiner notes that the predetermined angle is determined by the number of teeth for the first gear, the second gear and the third gear (paragraph 0138-0139 of Sasaki) and the number of teeth of each the first gear, the second gear and the third gear is based on the desired ratio wanted by the end user. Furthermore, with respect to the specific teeth ratio for the first, second and third gear, to have the prime number for the predetermined angle is a numerical value that is not capable of dividing 360, wherein a quotient, which is a calculation result of dividing 360 by the value of the predetermined angle, is not an integer, the courts have held that where the general conditions of the invention are met, a change in size is generally recognized as being within the level of ordinary skill in the art., In re Rose, 105 USPQ 237 (CCPA 1955). MPEP 2144.04 IV. A. Therefore, it would have been obvious to further modify the number of teeth on each of the first gear, the second gear and the third gear to have the specific teeth ratio for the first, second and third gear, to have the prime number for the predetermined angle is a numerical value that is not capable of dividing 360 set forth in the claim based on the end user’s desired speed of cut. The resulting device of modified Nakamura teaches the predetermined angle is a numerical value that is not capable of dividing 360, wherein a quotient (as modified, an angle number for the desired ratio of teeth), which is a calculation result of dividing 360 by the value of the predetermined angle, is not an integer (as modified, an angle number for the desired ratio of teeth), the number of the first teeth is different from the number of the second teeth (as modified, with the desired ratio of teeth), and wherein the number of the first teeth and the number of the second teeth are smaller than the number of the third teeth (as modified, with the desired ratio of teeth), wherein the first gear and the second gear are coaxially rotatably attached to the slider by a screw passing through a center of a rotation shaft (as modified, see Figure 4 of Sasaki), and wherein the third gear and the blade member are coaxially rotatably attached to the slider by a screw passing through a center thereof (as modified, see Figure 4 of Sasaki). Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 7/24/2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. In response to applicant's argument Nakamura in view of Sasaki fails to teach the screw connection for the gears. The examiner disagrees and notes that modified Nakamura teaches the first gear and the second gear are coaxially rotatably attached to the slider by a screw passing through a center of a rotation shaft (as modified, see Figure 4 of Sasaki), and wherein the third gear and the blade member are coaxially rotatably attached to the slider by a screw passing through a center thereof (as modified, see Figure 4 of Sasaki), thus the limitation are considered met. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to LIANG DONG whose telephone number is (571)270-0479. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Thursday 8 AM-6 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Ashley Boyer can be reached at 571-272-4502. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /LIANG DONG/Examiner, Art Unit 3724 9/17/2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 3 earlier events
Jan 13, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Apr 06, 2026
Response Filed
May 05, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103
Jun 30, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Jun 30, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Jul 24, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Jul 27, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Sep 21, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12746591
FLOATING CUTTER UNIT AND TRIMMING PRESS PROCESSING DEVICE
2y 9m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12703120
VISUAL INDICATION OF COMPOSITE FIBER ORIENTATION
5y 8m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12690514
AUTOMATIC FEED SYSTEM FOR A TRIMMER
3y 7m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12695114
PROCESSING APPARATUS FOR ELECTRODE ASSEMBLY OF SECONDARY BATTERY
2y 6m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12686144
TELESCOPING SLICER
2y 9m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

4-5
Expected OA Rounds
53%
Grant Probability
86%
With Interview (+32.9%)
2y 11m (~2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 504 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month