Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/574,009

DEVICE FOR PACKAGING A DOSE OF A SOLID OR PASTY PRODUCT PLACED IN A RESERVOIR

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Dec 23, 2023
Examiner
REYNOLDS, STEVEN ALAN
Art Unit
3735
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
A 2 C
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
66%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 7m
To Grant
89%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 66% — above average
66%
Career Allow Rate
1113 granted / 1697 resolved
-4.4% vs TC avg
Strong +24% interview lift
Without
With
+23.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
50 currently pending
Career history
1747
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
44.5%
+4.5% vs TC avg
§102
27.5%
-12.5% vs TC avg
§112
20.6%
-19.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1697 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Group I (claims 1-8) and Species 1 (Figures 1-3 and 11) in the reply filed on 1/23/2026 is acknowledged. In the reply, Applicant indicated that claims 1-7 and new claims 14-16 are directed to elected Species 1. Therefore, claims 8-13 are withdrawn from consideration. Drawings The drawings are objected to under 37 CFR 1.83(a). The drawings must show every feature of the invention specified in the claims. Therefore, the two outer layers having a cut-out respectively delimiting a main body and a gripping tab [claim 1] must be shown or the feature(s) canceled from the claim(s). No new matter should be entered. The drawings are objected to as failing to comply with 37 CFR 1.84(p)(5) because they include the following reference character(s) not mentioned in the description: Reference numerals ‘42’ and ‘46’ are shown in the drawings but is not mentioned in the specification. The drawings are objected to as failing to comply with 37 CFR 1.84(p)(4) because reference character “41” has been used to designate both the gripping tab and peripheral zone in Fig. 1C. The drawings are objected to as failing to comply with 37 CFR 1.84(p)(5) because they do not include the following reference sign(s) mentioned in the description: Contour ‘30’ is mentioned in the specification but is not shown in the drawings. Corrected drawing sheets in compliance with 37 CFR 1.121(d) are required in reply to the Office action to avoid abandonment of the application. Any amended replacement drawing sheet should include all of the figures appearing on the immediate prior version of the sheet, even if only one figure is being amended. Each drawing sheet submitted after the filing date of an application must be labeled in the top margin as either “Replacement Sheet” or “New Sheet” pursuant to 37 CFR 1.121(d). If the changes are not accepted by the examiner, the applicant will be notified and informed of any required corrective action in the next Office action. The objection to the drawings will not be held in abeyance. Specification The disclosure is objected to because of the following informalities: The specification uses reference numeral ‘30’ to refer to the contour of the applicator ([0047]), the applicator ([0048]), and the gripping tab ([0050]). The specification uses reference numeral ‘13’ to refer to the gripping tab ([0046]) and the shoulder ([0046]) The specification uses reference numeral ‘34’ to refer to the convergent rectangular or trapezoidal part ([0048]), the neck ([0048]), the blade ([0052]), the first part ([0057]) and the stopper ([0073]). The specification uses reference numeral ‘34’ to refer to the convergent rectangular or trapezoidal part ([0048]), the neck ([0048]), the blade ([0052]), the first part ([0057]) and the stopper ([0073]). The specification uses both reference numerals ’40’ and ‘41’ to refer to the gripping tab ([0050]). The specification uses reference numeral ‘45’ to refer to the recess ([0037]), cut-out ([0049]), the cavity ([0050]), the cut ([0051]) and the window ([0045]). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-7 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 1 is rendered indefinite by the limitation “the two outer layers having a cut-out respectively delimiting a main body and a gripping tab” in lines 3-4, since it is unclear how a cut-out can delimit both the main body and the gripping tab. Furthermore, it is unclear where the cut-out would be located on the two outer layers. For examination purposes, Examiner interprets the limitation as “the two outer layers having a main body and a gripping tab”. Claim 1 recites the limitation "the frangible line” of the first intermediate layer in line 13. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim 2 recites the limitation "the frangible line” of the second intermediate layer in line 10. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim 4 is rendered indefinite by the limitation “a transverse line of weakness” since it is unclear if the transverse line of weakness is the same structure as the “transverse frangible line” defined in claim 1 or a different line. For examination purposes, Examiner interprets “wherein each of the two outer layers has a transverse line of weakness” as “wherein the transverse frangible line is”. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 14-16 are allowed. Claims 1-7 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to STEVEN A REYNOLDS whose telephone number is (571)272-9959. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9am-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Anthony Stashick can be reached at (571) 272-4561. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /STEVEN A. REYNOLDS/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3735
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 23, 2023
Application Filed
Mar 11, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12600549
Header Bag for Packaging at Least One Medical Device
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12595092
IMPROVED STATIONERY PAPER PACKAGING
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12595955
MODULAR BOX ASSEMBLY
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12583661
CHIP STORING DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12569406
AM/PM MULTI-DAY PILL CONTAINER
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
66%
Grant Probability
89%
With Interview (+23.6%)
2y 7m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1697 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month