Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/574,192

COMPOUND USING NATURAL PIGMENT

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Dec 26, 2023
Priority
Jul 06, 2021 — JP 2021-112095 +1 more
Examiner
GREEN, ANTHONY J
Art Unit
1731
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
85%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 85% — above average
85%
Career Allowance Rate
1377 granted / 1619 resolved
+20.1% vs TC avg
Moderate +13% lift
Without
With
+13.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 9m
Avg Prosecution
43 currently pending
Career history
1644
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.8%
-39.2% vs TC avg
§103
49.2%
+9.2% vs TC avg
§102
3.9%
-36.1% vs TC avg
§112
23.8%
-16.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1619 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Group I, claims 1 and 3-7 in the reply filed on 29 May 2026 is acknowledged. Claim 2 is withdrawn from consideration as being drawn to a non-elected invention. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1 and 3-5 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by WO 2008/045534 A2 as evidenced by Screening Assessment Acrylates and Methacrylates Group with respect to claim 4. This reference teaches in claim 1, a curcumin derivative bound to a carboxylic acid. See structure (I) in claim 1, wherein n is 0 thus making L be 0 and Y is -CH=CH-C(O)OR8 where R8 is H. The instant claims are met by the reference. As for claim 1, the reference teaches a curcumin derivative bound to a carboxylic acid. See structure (I) in claim 1, wherein n is 0 thus making L be 0 and Y is -CH=CH-C(O)OR8 where R8 is H and therefore Y is -CH=CH-C(O)OH which represents acrylic acid thus meeting the organic acid of claim 1. The molecular weight falls within the claimed range. As for claim 3, the Y group contains at least one carboxylic acid. As for claim 4, the evidentiary document teaches on page 1, that acrylic acid can be naturally occurring and therefore claim 4 is met as this carboxylic acid can be naturally occurring. As for claim 5, the Y group represents carboxylic acid. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 6-7 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over WO 2008/045534 A2 in view of Epple et al (US Patent Application Publication No. US 20150101506 A1. The WO 2008/045534 A2 reference was discussed previously, above. Epple et al teaches, in claim 4, that it is known to use curcumin as a colorant in an ink composition. The instant claims are obvious over the reference. As for claim 6, while the reference does not recite the particle size of the compound it is within the level of ordinary skill in the art to manufacture the compound in the desired size depending on its end use. It has been held that where the general conditions of a claim are disclosed in the prior art, discovering the optimum or workable ranges involves only routine skill in the art. In re Aller, 220 F.2d 454, 105 USPQ 223 (CCPA 1955). As for claim 7, the WO 2008/045534 A2 reference teaches the formation of a dye from the curcumin derivative. Epple et al teaches that curcumin is known to be used as a colorant in ink compositions and therefore the use of the curcumin derivative from WO 2008/045534 A2 as and additive to ink is obvious. Reference Cited By The Examiner Europe Patent Specification No. EP 2813145 A1 teaches novel curcumin and tetrahydrocurcumin derivatives wherein one of the phenolic groups have been modified. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ANTHONY J GREEN whose telephone number is (571)272-1367. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Thursday from 6:30-5. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Amber R. Orlando can be reached at (571) 270-3149. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ANTHONY J GREEN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1731 ajg June 15, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 26, 2023
Application Filed
Jun 18, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12679770
THERMAL INSULATION MATERIAL AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING THERMAL INSULATION MATERIAL
3y 3m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12668543
DRY GRINDING OF STEEL MAKING SLAG, GROUND STEEL MAKING SLAG, AND ITS USE IN CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS
2y 9m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12668536
HYALOCLASTITE, SIDEROMELANE OR TACHYLITE POZZOLAN-BASED GEOPOLYMER CEMENT AND CONCRETE AND METHOD OF MAKING AND USING SAME
3y 1m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12668540
Compositions of Steel-microfiber Reinforced Ultra High Performance Concrete (UHPC) using recycled glass powder and processes for making the same
2y 8m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12668658
BINDER COMPOSITION, EPOXY-BASED CURED PRODUCT FORMED THEREFROM, AND LIGHT EMITTING LAYER CONTAINING EPOXY-BASED CURED PRODUCT
2y 7m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
85%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+13.4%)
1y 9m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1619 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month