Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/574,230

WEARABLE APPARATUS AND METHOD OF DETECTING ACTIVITIES THEREWITH

Final Rejection §112
Filed
Dec 26, 2023
Priority
Jun 26, 2021 — provisional 63/215,454 +3 more
Examiner
SABAH, HARIS
Art Unit
2682
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Auctify Inc.
OA Round
2 (Final)
77%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
3m
Est. Remaining
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 77% — above average
77%
Career Allowance Rate
515 granted / 672 resolved
+14.6% vs TC avg
Strong +16% interview lift
Without
With
+16.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
24 currently pending
Career history
690
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.4%
-35.6% vs TC avg
§103
80.6%
+40.6% vs TC avg
§102
7.4%
-32.6% vs TC avg
§112
4.9%
-35.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 672 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status 1. The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . 2. Claims 1-10 are pending in this amended application. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 3. The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112(a): (a) IN GENERAL.—The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor or joint inventor of carrying out the invention. The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112: The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention. 4. Claims 1-10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, first paragraph. Specifically, because the claimed invention is not supported by either a asserted utility or a well-established utility for the reasons set forth above, one skilled in the art clearly would not know how to use the claimed invention. As to claim 1, the claim limitations recited “control capture of image data by the image sensor; associate captured image data with timestamps prior to transmission; store the timestamped image data in the local memory; preprocess the stored image data to generate formatted image data; and generate a reduced data payload comprising the formatted image data and associated metadata and transmit the reduced data payload via the BLE wireless transmitter to an external device” do not described in original filed specification in such a way as to reasonably convey to one of ordinary skill in the relevant art that the inventor(s), at the time of the application was filed, had the possession of the claimed invention, because the claimed invention do not have sufficient support from the original filed specification. When Examiner has reviewed information in the original filed specification (see figs. 6-9 and pages 3-8), particularly in pages 7, 28-36 disclosing the information, wearable device transmits image and other data captured by the wearable device to device 1100. However, Examiner did not find any reasonable support from original filed specification for the claim limitations recited “store the timestamped image data in the local memory; preprocess the stored image data to generate formatted image data; and generate a reduced data payload comprising the formatted image data and associated metadata and transmit the reduced data payload via the BLE wireless transmitter to an external device”, not even nowhere any part of the filed disclosure, that the preprocess the stored image data to generate formatted image data; and generate a reduced data payload comprising the formatted image data and associated metadata and transmit the reduced data payload via the BLE wireless transmitter (external device). Thus, it is not clearly provided the detailed information in the original filed specification that how one of the ordinary skill in the art would be apprised the scope of the claim. Claims 5, 9 are also rejected based on same rationale applied on claim 1. Allowable Subject Matter 5. Claims 1-10 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 1st paragraph, set forth in this Office action. REASONS FOR ALLOWANCE 6. The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance: The independent claim 1 is allowable over the prior arts of record since the cited references taken individually or in combination fails to particularly anticipate or disclose or suggest the claim limitations recited “control capture of image data by the image sensor; associate captured image data with timestamps prior to transmission; store the timestamped image data in the local memory; preprocess the stored image data to generate formatted image data; and generate a reduced data payload comprising the formatted image data and associated metadata and transmit the reduced data payload via the BLE wireless transmitter to an external device”, in combination with all other limitations as claimed in independent claim 1. The independent claim 5 is allowable over the prior arts of record since the cited references taken individually or in combination fails to particularly anticipate or disclose or suggest the claim limitations recited “control capture of image data by the image sensor; associate captured image data with timestamps prior to transmission; store the timestamped image data in the local memory; preprocess the stored image data to generate formatted image data; and generate a reduced data payload comprising the formatted image data and associated metadata and transmit the reduced data payload via the BLE wireless transmitter to an external device”, in combination with all other limitations as claimed in independent claim 5. The independent claim 9 is allowable over the prior arts of record since the cited references taken individually or in combination fails to particularly anticipate or disclose or suggest the claim limitations recited “storing the timestamped image data in local memory of the wearable device; preprocessing the stored timestamped image data, using the firmware, to generate formatted image data and associated metadata; and generating a reduced data payload comprising the formatted image data and associated metadata and transmit the reduced data payload via the BLE wireless transmitter to an external device that is configured to provide information about the user's activities through a graphical user interface; transmitting the reduced data payload via the BLE wireless transmitter to an external device”, in combination with all other limitations as claimed in independent claim 9. Conclusion 7. THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to HARIS SABAH whose telephone number is (571)270-3917. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday/Thursday from 7:00AM to 5:30PM EST. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner's supervisor, Benny Tieu, can be reached on (571)272-7490. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. The Examiner’s personal fax number is (571)-270-4917. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://portal.uspto.gov/external/portal. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). /HARIS SABAH/Examiner, Art Unit 2682
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 26, 2023
Application Filed
Nov 25, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Feb 24, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Feb 25, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Feb 26, 2026
Response Filed
Mar 17, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12626352
INSPECTION SYSTEMS AND ASSOCIATED METHODS FOR GAS TURBINE ENGINE COMPONENTS
2y 3m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12620090
ANALYSIS OF FUNDUS AUTOFLUORESCENCE IMAGES
2y 11m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12620210
MACHINE-LEARNING TECHNIQUES FOR DETECTING ARTIFACT PIXELS IN IMAGES
2y 1m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12620217
TRAINING DEVICE, TRAINING METHOD, AND TRAINING PROGRAM
2y 0m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12614638
Method For Assessing Vasculature, Obtaining Angiographic Parametric Imaging (API) Maps Of Vasculature And Determining State Of Vasculature Using Machine-learning Classifier
3y 11m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
77%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+16.5%)
2y 8m (~3m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 672 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month