Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/574,230

WEARABLE APPARATUS AND METHOD OF DETECTING ACTIVITIES THEREWITH

Final Rejection §112
Filed
Dec 26, 2023
Examiner
SABAH, HARIS
Art Unit
2682
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Auctify Inc.
OA Round
2 (Final)
76%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 7m
To Grant
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 76% — above average
76%
Career Allow Rate
511 granted / 668 resolved
+14.5% vs TC avg
Strong +17% interview lift
Without
With
+16.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
19 currently pending
Career history
687
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
11.2%
-28.8% vs TC avg
§103
57.1%
+17.1% vs TC avg
§102
20.6%
-19.4% vs TC avg
§112
6.0%
-34.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 668 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status 1. The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . 2. Claims 1-10 are pending in this amended application. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 3. The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112(a): (a) IN GENERAL.—The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor or joint inventor of carrying out the invention. The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112: The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention. 4. Claims 1-10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, first paragraph. Specifically, because the claimed invention is not supported by either a asserted utility or a well-established utility for the reasons set forth above, one skilled in the art clearly would not know how to use the claimed invention. As to claim 1, the claim limitations recited “control capture of image data by the image sensor; associate captured image data with timestamps prior to transmission; store the timestamped image data in the local memory; preprocess the stored image data to generate formatted image data; and generate a reduced data payload comprising the formatted image data and associated metadata and transmit the reduced data payload via the BLE wireless transmitter to an external device” do not described in original filed specification in such a way as to reasonably convey to one of ordinary skill in the relevant art that the inventor(s), at the time of the application was filed, had the possession of the claimed invention, because the claimed invention do not have sufficient support from the original filed specification. When Examiner has reviewed information in the original filed specification (see figs. 6-9 and pages 3-8), particularly in pages 7, 28-36 disclosing the information, wearable device transmits image and other data captured by the wearable device to device 1100. However, Examiner did not find any reasonable support from original filed specification for the claim limitations recited “store the timestamped image data in the local memory; preprocess the stored image data to generate formatted image data; and generate a reduced data payload comprising the formatted image data and associated metadata and transmit the reduced data payload via the BLE wireless transmitter to an external device”, not even nowhere any part of the filed disclosure, that the preprocess the stored image data to generate formatted image data; and generate a reduced data payload comprising the formatted image data and associated metadata and transmit the reduced data payload via the BLE wireless transmitter (external device). Thus, it is not clearly provided the detailed information in the original filed specification that how one of the ordinary skill in the art would be apprised the scope of the claim. Claims 5, 9 are also rejected based on same rationale applied on claim 1. Allowable Subject Matter 5. Claims 1-10 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 1st paragraph, set forth in this Office action. REASONS FOR ALLOWANCE 6. The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance: The independent claim 1 is allowable over the prior arts of record since the cited references taken individually or in combination fails to particularly anticipate or disclose or suggest the claim limitations recited “control capture of image data by the image sensor; associate captured image data with timestamps prior to transmission; store the timestamped image data in the local memory; preprocess the stored image data to generate formatted image data; and generate a reduced data payload comprising the formatted image data and associated metadata and transmit the reduced data payload via the BLE wireless transmitter to an external device”, in combination with all other limitations as claimed in independent claim 1. The independent claim 5 is allowable over the prior arts of record since the cited references taken individually or in combination fails to particularly anticipate or disclose or suggest the claim limitations recited “control capture of image data by the image sensor; associate captured image data with timestamps prior to transmission; store the timestamped image data in the local memory; preprocess the stored image data to generate formatted image data; and generate a reduced data payload comprising the formatted image data and associated metadata and transmit the reduced data payload via the BLE wireless transmitter to an external device”, in combination with all other limitations as claimed in independent claim 5. The independent claim 9 is allowable over the prior arts of record since the cited references taken individually or in combination fails to particularly anticipate or disclose or suggest the claim limitations recited “storing the timestamped image data in local memory of the wearable device; preprocessing the stored timestamped image data, using the firmware, to generate formatted image data and associated metadata; and generating a reduced data payload comprising the formatted image data and associated metadata and transmit the reduced data payload via the BLE wireless transmitter to an external device that is configured to provide information about the user's activities through a graphical user interface; transmitting the reduced data payload via the BLE wireless transmitter to an external device”, in combination with all other limitations as claimed in independent claim 9. Conclusion 7. THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to HARIS SABAH whose telephone number is (571)270-3917. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday/Thursday from 7:00AM to 5:30PM EST. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner's supervisor, Benny Tieu, can be reached on (571)272-7490. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. The Examiner’s personal fax number is (571)-270-4917. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://portal.uspto.gov/external/portal. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). /HARIS SABAH/Examiner, Art Unit 2682
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 26, 2023
Application Filed
Nov 21, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §112
Feb 24, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Feb 25, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Feb 26, 2026
Response Filed
Mar 13, 2026
Final Rejection — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12602947
Method And System For Extracting Data From Documents And Automatically Modifying Data Item Of The Extracted Data Based On Guidance Retrieved From Feedback File
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12602561
IMAGE PROCESSING DEVICE, PRINTING SYSYTEM, AND IMAGE PROCESSING PROGRAM
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12596510
PRINTING APPARATUS IS CONNECTABLE TO INSPECTION APPARATUS FOR COMPARING A READ IMAGE TO A CORRECT IMAGE TO DETERMINE IF THE READ IMAGE IS FREE OF ABNORMALITIES
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12597131
Children Visual Attention Abnormal Screening Method, Involves Extracting Eye Movement, Facial Expression And Head Movement Multi-mode Characteristic Of Children Based On Multimodal Data Learning
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12591969
MEDICAL INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, METHOD AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER-RADABLE STORAGE MEDIUM TO ACQUIRE BIOMETRIC DATA REGARDING SKIN IMAGE AND TO CONTINUOSLY MONITOR INTERNAL BODY COMPONENT WITHOUT USING SPECIAL EQUIPMENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
76%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+16.6%)
2y 7m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 668 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month