Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/575,112

CO-EXTRUDED SHEET AND RESIN-MOLDED PRODUCT

Non-Final OA §103§112
Filed
Dec 28, 2023
Examiner
MIGGINS, MICHAEL C
Art Unit
1782
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Maxell, Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
81%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 6m
To Grant
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 81% — above average
81%
Career Allow Rate
806 granted / 999 resolved
+15.7% vs TC avg
Strong +16% interview lift
Without
With
+16.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
44 currently pending
Career history
1043
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
42.6%
+2.6% vs TC avg
§102
24.5%
-15.5% vs TC avg
§112
13.2%
-26.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 999 resolved cases

Office Action

§103 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 1 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 1 recites the limitation "the polycarbonate resin contained in the core layer" in lines 6-7. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim since the polycarbonate being in the core layer has not been previously established. Claim 1 recites the limitation "the polycarbonate resin contained in one of the first and second skin layers" in lines 7-8. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim since the polycarbonate resin contained in one of the first and second skin layers has not been previously established. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-8 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Aoki et al. (US 6,492,015) in view of Li et al. (US 2016/0082693). Aoki discloses a co-extruded sheet containing a polycarbonate resin, comprising: a core layer formed from a foam resin; a first skin layer formed from a non-foaming resin and laminated to one major surface of the core layer; and a second skin layer laminated to another major surface of the core layer in a heat-resistant receptacle (column 1, line 62 through column 2, line 2, column 3, line 56 through column 4, line 44, column 5, line 21 through column 6, line 15, Example 9). Aoki does not disclose wherein a melt volume-flow rate of the polycarbonate resin contained in the core layer (hereinafter referred to as MVRc) and a melt volume-flow rate of the polycarbonate resin contained in one of the first and second skin layers (hereinafter referred to as MVRs) satisfy the following expression: 1.5 ≤ MVRs/MVRc ≤ 8.0, or 2.5, or 2.3. Li discloses wherein a melt volume-flow rate of a polypropylene resin contained in the core layer (hereinafter referred to as MVRc) and a melt volume-flow rate of a polypropylene resin contained in one of the first and second skin layers (hereinafter referred to as MVRs) satisfy the following expression: 1.5 ≤ MVRs/MVRc ≤ 8.0, or 2.5, or 2.3 (since MFR = Density x MVR, wherein density is a constant since the materials of the skin and core layers are the same) (paragraphs [0069] – [0070]) in a heat-resisting receptacle (paragraphs [0003 – 0004]) for the purpose of minimizing crystallization of the unexpanded skin layer at the expansion temperature of the expanded core layer, prevent undesirable shrinkage of the skin layers and prevent wrinkling (paragraphs [0069 – 0070]. Both references are drawn to heat resistant receptacles. Therefore it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time applicant’s invention was made to have provided wherein a melt volume-flow rate of the polycarbonate resin contained in the core layer (hereinafter referred to as MVRc) and a melt volume-flow rate of the polycarbonate resin contained in one of the first and second skin layers (hereinafter referred to as MVRs) satisfy the following expression: 1.5 ≤ MVRs/MVRc ≤ 8.0, or 2.5, or 2.3 in Aoki in order to minimize crystallization of the unexpanded skin layer at the expansion temperature of the expanded core layer, prevent undesirable shrinkage of the skin layers and prevent wrinkling as taught or suggested by Li. Aoki also discloses wherein the co-extruded sheet has an apparent density of 0.4 to 0.8 g/cm³, wherein the co-extruded sheet has a thickness of 1.5 to 6 mm, wherein the co-extruded sheet satisfies the following expression: 0.10 ≤ (t1+t2)/T ≤ 0.5, 11 indicates a thickness of the first skin layer, 12 indicates a thickness of the second skin layer, and T indicates a thickness of the co-extruded sheet, a resin-molded product made from the co-extruded (column 1, line 62 through column 2, line 2, column 3, line 56 through column 4, line 44, column 5, line 21 through column 6, line 15, Example 9). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MICHAEL C MIGGINS whose telephone number is (571)272-1494. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday, 1-9 pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Aaron Austin can be reached at 571-272-8935. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MICHAEL C MIGGINS/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1782 MCM January 14, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 28, 2023
Application Filed
Jan 14, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12590652
THIN-WALLED HEAT SHRINK TUBING
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12589881
Co-Cured UV/Visible Light-Resistant Coated Composite Material for Aircraft Wing Fuel Tank Assembly
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12590653
FUEL HOSE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12583989
BIODEGRADABLE COMPOSITIONS AND ARTICLES FORMED THEREFROM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12577022
PACKAGING BAG
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
81%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+16.3%)
2y 6m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 999 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month