DETAILED ACTION
Notice of AIA Status
The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA .
Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103
In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status.
The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action:
A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made.
Claims 1, 4, 6 – 7, and 11 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Little in view of Li.
Regarding Claim 1, Little discloses “An electronic device assembly, comprising: an electronic device comprising a housing” (Figure 23, Item 400 ‘case’, and Paragraph [0073], Lines 1 – 5 (Notice that an electronic device assembly with housing 400 is provided.)), “the housing having a data interface” (Figure 23 and Paragraph [0075], Lines 1 - 5 (Notice that the receptacle connector with mating cavity 412 and contacts 414 provides a data interface.))“, “and a data cable comprising a cable body” (Figures 31 – 32D, Item 280 ‘cable’ (Notice that a data cable 280 to mate with the data interface of Figure 23 has cable body form.)), “a connection plug disposed at one end of the cable body” (Figure 32(A), Item 210 ‘mating part’ (Notice that mating part 210 provides a connection plug disposed at one end of the cable body of cable 280.)), “and a fixing structure disposed on a side of the connection plug” (Figure 32(A), Item 300 ‘boot’, and Paragraph [0078], Line 1 (Notice the boot 300 provides a structure disposed on a side of the connection plug.)), “wherein: when the connection plug is plugged in the data interface, the fixing structure is capable of fixing the connection plug to the housing” (Figures 23, 24, and 32(A) (Notice that when the connection plug 210 is plugged into the receptacle connector (data interface), the fixing structure 300 is capable of fixing the connection plug to the housing 400.)), “wherein: the fixing structure comprises a fixing table disposed on the side of the connection plug” (Figure 32(A) (Notice that fixing structure 300 provides a fixing table via the shape of boot body.)), “and a fastener movably disposed on the fixing table” (Figures 31 and 32(A), Item 310 ‘locking screw’, and Paragraph [0078], Lines 18 – 25 (Notice that at least a locking screw 310 is movable disposed in the fixing table body shape of boot 300.)), “the housing has an engagement portion; and the fastener is fixedly connected to the engagement portion” (Figures 23, 24, and 32(A), and Items 402 ‘screw holes’, and Paragraph [0075], last three lines (Notice that at least a screw hole 402 provide an engagement portion to be fixedly connected to plug locking screws.)), “the fixing table has a first through hole and second through hole [parallel] to each other” (Figures 31 and 32(A) (Notice that the table body shape of boot 300 provided a first through hole at the rear wall 306 and second though hole via a channel 304.)), “an axial direction of the first through hole being parallel to an extending direction of the cable body” (Figures 31 and 32(A) (Notice that an axial direction of the first through hole in the rear wall 306 extend parallel to the extending direction of the body of cable 280.)), “an axial direction of the second through hole being [parallel] to the extending direction of the cable body” (Figures 31 and 32(A) (Notice that an axial direction of the second through hole of a channel 304 is parallel to the extending direction of the body of cable 280.)), “the fixing table detachable sleeved on the side of the connection plug via the first through hole, and a part of the fastener penetrating and disposed in the second through hole” (Figures 31 and 32(A) – 32(D) (Notice that the stages of the cited figures show that table body shape of boot 300 providing the fixing table is detachable sleeved on the side of the connection plug 210 via the first through hole in the rear wall 306 and a fastener 310 disposed in the second through hole of a channel 304)), “the fastener comprises a limiting end and a fastening end, the limiting end being located outside of the second through hole and having a greater diameter that the second through hole, and the fastening end being configured to fixedly connected to the engagement portion” (Figure 32(A) (Notice that fastener 310 has a limiting end 320 located outside of the second through hole of channel 304 with diameter larger than the channel 304 an fastening end 318 configured to connected to the above described engagement portion.)),
“wherein the first through hole has an annular closed hole wall” (Figures 31 and 32(A) – 32(D) (Notice that the first through hole provided in the rear wall 306 is annular and closed (note that Figure 31 is cutaway view of Figure 28(B).)), “and a plug-in direction of the connection plug is [parallel] to the axial direction of the first through hole and parallel to the axial direction of the second through hole” (Figures 15, 23, 24, and 32(A) (Notice that the plug-in direction of connection plug 210 is parallel to the axial direction of the first through hole in real wall 306 and parallel to the axial direction of the second through hole of channel 304.)), “and the connection plug extends beyond a bottom surface of the fixing table along the plug-in direction [parallel] to the axial direction of the first through hole and parallel to the axial direction of the second through hole” (Figure 32(A) (Notice that the connection plug 210 extends past the bottom surface of the table body shape of boot 300 in the plug-direction with is parallel to the axial direction of the first through hole in real wall 306 and parallel to the axial direction of the second through hole of channel 304.)). However, Little fails to explicitly disclose the first through hole and second through hole being “perpendicular”, the second through hole being “perpendicular” to the extending direction of the cable body, the plug-direction of the connection plug being “perpendicular” to the first through hole, and the connection plug extending beyond the bottom surface along the “perpendicular” to the axial direction of the first through hole.
In a similar field of endeavor, Li describes a power adapter output joint (Figure 1, Page 2, Lines 34 - 38) that teaches a female connector 101(1011) and male connector 102(1021) that run perpendicular to an extension direction of power line(cable) 5 that enters 102 via an opening with axial direction parallel to the extending direction of power line 5. Also, male connector 102 shows a screw 1015 with a second through hole in insulating layer 1012 that are perpendicular to the extension direction of power line(cable) 5 and in the same direction of female connector 1011.
Therefore, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to provide where the first through hole and second through hole being “perpendicular”, the second through hole being “perpendicular” to the extending direction of the cable body, the plug-direction of the connection plug being “perpendicular” to the first through hole, and the connection plug extending beyond the bottom surface along the “perpendicular” to the axial direction of the first through hole because one having ordinary skill in the art would want to prevent bending fracture phenomenon (Li, Page 2, Lines 27 – 28).
Regarding Claim 4, Little and Li, the combination of hereinafter referenced as LL, disclose/teach everything claimed as applied above (See Claim 1). In addition, Little discloses “wherein: the fastening end has threads” (Figure 31, Items 310 and 318, and Paragraph [0078], Line 19 (Notice front threaded section 318 of locking screw 310.), “the engagement portion has a threaded hole” (Figures 23, 24, and 32(A), and Items 402 ‘screw holes’, and Paragraph [0075], last three lines (Notice that at least a screw hole 402 provides an internal thread for accepting the external thread of threaded section 318.)), “and when the connection plug is plugged in the data interface, the threaded hole is located at a position corresponding to the fastening end, enabling the fastening end to be connected to the threaded hole through the threads” (Figures 15, 15(A), 23, 24, and 32(A) (Notice that when connection plug 210 is engaged with receptacle connector having mating cavity 412 and contacts 414, the threaded hole provided by a screw hole 402 is located at matching position to the front threaded section 318 of locking screw 310 to enable fastening through engagement of threads.))
Regarding Claim 6, LL disclose/teach everything claimed as applied above (See Claim 1). In addition, Little discloses “wherein the second through hole has a limiting boss disposed in a middle section of the second through hole, the limiting boss being configured to limit detachment of the fastener from the second through hole” (Figures 31, 32(A), 32(B) (Notice that the second through hole formed via channel 304 has a limiting boss formed where front narrow section 312 forms a tapered configuration 3121 with step structure 316 at behind to limit detachment of fastener 310.))
Regarding Claim 7, LL disclose/teach everything claimed as applied above (See Claim 1). In addition, Little fails to explicitly disclose “wherein the plug-in direction of the connection plug is perpendicular to an extending direction of the cable body” However, Li describes a power adapter output joint (Figure 1) that teaches a female connector 101(1011) and male connector 102(1021) that run perpendicular to an extension direction of power line(cable) 5 that enters 102 via an opening with axial direction parallel to the extending direction of power line 5.
Therefore, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to provide “wherein the plug-in direction of the connection plug is perpendicular to an extending direction of the cable body” because one having ordinary skill in the art would want to prevent bending fracture phenomenon (Li, Page 2, Lines 27 – 28).
Regarding Claim 11, LL disclose/teaches everything claimed as applied above (See Claim 1). In addition, Little discloses “wherein the axial direction of the first through hole and the axial direction of the second through hole are non-coplanar” (Figure 31 (Notice that the axial direction of the first through hole in rear wall 306 and the axial direction of the second through hole provided by channel 304 are non-coplanar for a plane in the axial direction of each hole (i.e. parallel to the axial direction) but shifted to slice between the diameters of each of hole in rear wall 306 and channel 304 without slicing through the diameter of either through hole (i.e. in space between the two diameters, but not overlapping the said diameter)).
Claim 5 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Little, in view of Li, and further in view of Baxter.
Regarding Claim 5, LL disclose/teach everything claimed as applied above (See Claim 1). In addition, LL fail to explicitly disclose “wherein a diameter of the fastening end is greater than the diameter of the through hole by 0.1 mm to 0.5 mm”.
In a similar field of fastening tolerances, Baxter teaches thread tooth depth as being approximately 4 thousandths of inch (0.01MM) for a nut structure where a machine screw fastener tooth depth engages with the nut structure (Column 5, Lines 15 – 43).
Therefore, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to provide “wherein a diameter of the fastening end is greater than the diameter of the through hole by 0.1 mm to 0.5 mm” because one having ordinary skill in the art would to provide thread engagement for screw retention.
Claims 8 - 10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Little, in view of Li, and further in view of Iverson.
Regarding Claim 8, LL and Iverson disclose/ teach everything claimed as applied above (See Claim 1). In addition, Little discloses “wherein: the fixing structure comprises a knob screw” (Figures 31 and 32(A), Item 320 (Notice that rear operation section provided a knob for the locking screw 310.)) “the housing has a [screw hole] embedded therein; and when the connection plug is connected to the data interface, the [screw hole] is opposite to the knob screw, enabling the knob screw to be engaged with the [screw hole]” (Figures 15, 15(A), 23, 24, and 32(A) (Notice that when connection plug 210 is engaged with receptacle connector having mating cavity 412 and contacts 414, the threaded hole provided by a screw hole 402 is located at matching position to the front threaded section 318 of locking screw 310 to enable fastening through engagement of threads.)). However, Little and Li fails to explicitly disclose where threaded receptacles are a “metal nut” embedded therein.
In a similar field of endeavor, Iverson teaches a housing with embedded metal nut for engagement with a knob screw for cable connection (Figure 3 and Column 3, Line 36 (Notice that metal nut 30 is embedded in housing 20.))
Therefore, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to provide threaded receptacles that are a “metal nut” because one having ordinary skill in the art would want to provide tightening feedback (Iverson, Column 3, Lines 10 – 14).
Regarding Claim 9, LL and Iverson disclose/ teach everything claimed as applied above (See Claim 8). In addition, LL fail to explicitly disclose “wherein the metal nut and the housing are formed into one piece”. However, Iverson teaches “wherein the metal nut and the housing are formed into one piece” (Figure 3 (Notice that metal nut 30 is place in opening 50 within the housing to form one assembly piece.)).
Therefore, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to provide “wherein the metal nut and the housing are formed into one piece” because one having ordinary skill in the art would want to prevent movement that compromises a solid connection.
Regarding Claim 10, LL and Iverson disclose/ teach everything claimed as applied above (See Claim 8). In addition, LL fails to explicitly disclose “wherein the metal nut has a flange disposed at an end of the metal nut facing away from a surface of the housing, the flange being configured to block a movement of the metal nut toward the surface of the housing”. However, Iverson teaches “wherein the metal nut has a flange disposed at an end of the metal nut facing away from a surface of the housing, the flange being configured to block a movement of the metal nut toward the surface of the housing” (Figure 3 and Column 3, Lines 55 - 59 (Notice the metal nut 30 disposed in housing 20 has a flange at base portion 36 disposed at the end of the metal nut 30 that faces away from the surface of the housing near the arrowing coming from reference numeral 16 and blocks movement of the metal nut 30 toward said surface via contact with wall 52.)).
Therefore, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to provide “wherein the metal nut has a flange disposed at an end of the metal nut facing away from a surface of the housing, the flange being configured to block a movement of the metal nut toward the surface of the housing” because one having ordinary skill in the art would want to prevent movement that compromises a solid connection.
Response to Applicants Amendments and Arguments
Applicants amendments and arguments filed June 25, 2025 have been fully considered.
First, the Examiner disagrees that - - Little teaches the opposite. As shown in Figure 28(B) of Little, reproduced below, the axis of the first through hole 308 and the axis of the second through hole 304 are parallel to each other, and are therefore coplanar - - (REMARKS, Page 8, Last three lines of page). The Examiner disagrees because, as reasoned in the rejection of Claim 11 above, a plane exists between the axis of the first through hole 308 and the axis of the second through 304, where neither axis falls/rests in said plane and therefore the axial direction of each hole is non-coplanar to said plane (in other words, each axis falls/rests in a separate parallel planes).
Second, the Examiner disagrees that - - Li by no means discloses or suggests a perpendicular relationship between two through holes - - (REMARKS, Page 6, Lines 6 – 7). The Examiner disagrees because Li shows the extension direction of power line (cable) 5 at the entry point or attachment to joint main body 101 (i.e. regardless of whether a through hole exists because Little already provides for a though hole at the entry point or attachment to a main plug body) with a clear spatial relation of being perpendicular with regard to a second through hole in insulating layer 1012 for providing attachment.
Conclusion
THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a).
A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action.
Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to BRIAN M BUTCHER whose telephone number is (571)270-5575. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday – Friday from 6:30 AM to 3:00 PM.
If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner's supervisor, Ke Xiao, can be reached at (571) 272 - 7776. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300.
Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free).
/BRIAN M BUTCHER/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2627 July 13, 2026
Prosecution Insights