Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 18/575,923

DRIVE SYSTEM AND DETERMINING METHOD FOR DETERMINING A TEMPERATURE IN A METERING SYSTEM OF A DRIVE SYSTEM

Non-Final OA §103§Other
Filed
Jan 02, 2024
Priority
Jul 12, 2021 — DE 10 2021 207 351.4 +1 more
Examiner
COTEY, PHILIP L
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Robert Bosch GmbH
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
84%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 84% — above average
84%
Career Allowance Rate
650 granted / 774 resolved
+24.0% vs TC avg
Strong +21% interview lift
Without
With
+21.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
21 currently pending
Career history
792
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
59.1%
+19.1% vs TC avg
§102
7.6%
-32.4% vs TC avg
§112
26.2%
-13.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 774 resolved cases

Office Action

§103 §Other
DETAILED ACTION Claims 1 – 11 are pending in the present application. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers submitted under 35 U.S.C. 119(a)-(d), which papers have been placed of record in the file. Claim Objections Claim 9 is objected to because of the following informalities: in both lines 2 and 8 “a metering system (109)” is recited. There is a minor antecedent basis issue with two recitals of this metering system. However, as both are recited as the same element “(109)” they will be considered as the same. As such, the second recitation will be considered as “the metering system (109)” or the like. Regardless, appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claims 1-11 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Hoshi (US 20170187053) in view of Yang et al. ("Analysis of thermodynamic processes involving hydrogen", INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, published 13 AUG 2008; all reference to copy of record 01/02/2024 with the IDS of the same day; hereinafter Yang). Regarding claim 1, Hoshi teaches a drive system (100) for providing energy to drive a load (abstract; [0029]), the drive system (100) comprising: a compressed gas tank (101) with a pressure sensor (103) and a temperature sensor (105) (temperature/pressure sensors 41/42 with high-pressure tank 21 in gas supplying device 20; [0048] “gas supplying/discharging device 20 includes a high-pressure tank 21”; see also [0054] and [0081]; see also fig. 1 showing a representation the tank with sensors, valves and pump), an energy converter (107) for converting energy from a gas stored in the compressed gas tank (101) into drive energy (fuel cell system 100 with fuel cell stack 1; [0025]; [0029]), a metering system (109) for metering gas from the compressed gas tank (101) into the energy converter (107) ([0047-48]; see also at least [0053] teaching at least that “anode pressure control value 24 is controlled to open and close by the controller 101. By this open/close control, a pressure of the anode gas to be supplied to the fuel cell stack 1 is adjusted” in view of [0198] teaching that the adjustment is part of a stack request flow rate calculation for metering/calculating fuel flow rate to the cell via gas supplying device 20; see figs. 1 and 6-7; see also [0082]), and a control device (111) (101; [0080]) configured to calculate a temperature of gas flowing in the metering system (109) by means of a mathematical model (200) that models gas flowing from the compressed gas tank (101) into the metering system (109) (see at least [0168-174] including [0174] “gas temperature calculation unit 346 calculates the gas temperature”; see fig. 5 showing the modeled calculation of gas temperature in the metering system in view of fig. 1), wherein the control device (111) is further configured to provide the mathematical model (200) with measured values, which were determined by means of the pressure sensor (103) and/or the temperature sensor (105), as input values ([0168]; see also [0175-176]), wherein the control device (111) is further configured to provide the calculated temperature of the gas flowing into the metering system (109) to a supplementary system (see at least fig. 5 showing the calculated temperature(s) is provided to a further/supplementary system). Hoshi does not directly and specifically state that the model models an isenthalpic state change (teaching regarding a related gas enthalpy calculation – see at least [0168]). However, Yang teaches analysis of thermodynamic processes involving hydrogen (title – all throughout) including modeling an isenthalpic state change (heading 2.2 - pp.4415 to 4417). Therefore, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to modify the drive system having control via calculation/modeling of gas enthalpy of Hoshi with the knowledge taught regard isenthalpic expansion modeling and curves especially for hydrogen of Yang. This is because such isenthalpic expansion modeling allows for modeling throttled gas expansion for controlling the release of e.g. hydrogen (2.2 of Yang; see also [0044] of Hoshi). This is important in order to properly control and supply a fuel cell for powering a vehicle safely (see abstract pf Yang and [0029] of Hoshi). Regarding claim 2, Hoshi teaches that the energy converter (107) is a fuel cell system (see at least abstract). Regarding claim 3, Hoshi and Yang lack teaching that the energy converter (107) is an internal combustion engine. However, Hoshi does disclose use of the system in a vehicle (see at least [0029]). Therefore, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to modify the knowledge of measurement for controlling providing energy to drive a vehicle with isenthalpic expansion modeling of Hoshi and Yang with use in an internal combustion engine driven vehicle. This is because one of ordinary skill in the art would have expected the measurements regarding the gas temperature and pressure to be useful in vehicles generally supplying gas as energy to drive a load which is a vehicle is the desired result (see at least abstract and [0029] of Hoshi). Regarding claim 4, Hoshi teaches that the load is a mechanical system (see at least [0029] and [0166]). Regarding claim 5, Hoshi lacks direct and specific teaching that the mathematical model (200) comprises a correction term which mathematically represents an influence of a pressure reducer and/or a supply channel for supplying gas from the compressed gas tank (101) to the energy converter (107). However, Hoshi does further disclose an “anode pressure control valve 24” (see at least [0053]) which works with the jet pump (25; see fig. 1) to adjust the pressure of the gas to the fuel cell ([0053]) which is calculated by the model ([0175-177]). Therefore, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to modify the pressure control valve, pressure sensor and model calculations of Hoshi with a correction term. This is because one of ordinary skill in the art would have expected a correction term in the model / calculations to be one of several straightforward ways (mathematical correction/offset; specifical physical amount control or calculation from other known values) of accounting for the pressure control valve’s pressure reduction because more accurate understanding of the pressure before and after such a valve / pressure reducer allows for better control of the volume flow of gas (see [0176] of Hoshi). Regarding claim 6, Hoshi teaches that an area between the compressed gas tank (101) and the energy converter (107) is pressure sensor-free and temperature sensor-free (see at least fig. 1 showing various areas –i.e. all areas without a temperature of pressure sensor– which are pressure/temperature sensor-free). Regarding claim 7, Hoshi teaches that the drive system (100) comprises a pressure accumulator (101), comprising a pressure sensor (103) and a temperature sensor (105), and the control device (111) is configured to provide the mathematical model (200) measured values as input values (see at least [0168] and [0175-176] teaching regarding input pressure and temperature values; see also figs. 2 and 5). Hoshi lacks direct and specific teaching regarding a plurality of pressure accumulators each comprising a pressure and a temperature sensor and that the control device provides averaged measured values of the respective pressure sensors and temperature sensors. However, Hoshi does disclose using average values of measured temperature ([0151]). Therefore, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to modify the knowledge of averaging measured values of Hoshi with averaging measured values from plural pressure accumulators. This is important in order to a provide system wide understanding of the measured values. Further, it has been held that mere duplication of the essential working parts of a device (here plural pressure accumulators with respective pressure / temperature sensors) involves only routine skill in the art (see MPEP 2144.04 (VI-B)). Regarding claim 8, Hoshi does not directly and specifically state that the mathematical model (200) comprises a characteristic curve of an isenthalpic state change of a respective gas. However, Yang teaches analysis of thermodynamic processes involving hydrogen (title – all throughout) including modeling an isenthalpic state change (heading 2.2 - pp.4415 to 4417) with a characteristic curve of an isenthalpic state change of at least hydrogen (see at least figs. 5, 6 and 7 and heading 2.2). Therefore, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to modify the drive system having control via calculation/modeling of gas enthalpy of Hoshi with the knowledge taught regard isenthalpic expansion modeling and characteristic curves especially for hydrogen of Yang. This is because such isenthalpic expansion modeling and characteristic curves allow for modeling throttled gas expansion for controlling the release of e.g. hydrogen (2.2 of Yang; see also [0044] of Hoshi). This is important in order to properly control and supply a fuel cell for powering a vehicle safely (see abstract pf Yang and [0029] of Hoshi). Regarding claim 9, Hoshi teaches a method (300) (see at least title, [0001]) for determining a temperature (see at least fig. 7; element 346 “post-joining gas temperature calculation unit 346” [0164]) in a metering system (109) ([0047-48]; see also at least [0053] teaching at least that “anode pressure control value 24 is controlled to open and close by the controller 101. By this open/close control, a pressure of the anode gas to be supplied to the fuel cell stack 1 is adjusted” in view of [0198] teaching that the adjustment is part of a stack request flow rate calculation for metering/calculating fuel flow rate to the cell via gas supplying device 20; see figs. 1 and 6-7; see also [0082]) of a drive system (100) (abstract; [0029]), wherein the drive system (100) comprises: compressed gas tank (101) with a pressure sensor (103) and a temperature sensor (105) (temperature/pressure sensors 41/42 with high-pressure tank 21 in gas supplying device 20; [0048] “gas supplying/discharging device 20 includes a high-pressure tank 21”; see also [0054] and [0081]; see also fig. 1 showing a representation the tank with sensors, valves and pump), an energy converter (107) for converting energy from a gas stored in the compressed gas tank (101) into drive energy (fuel cell system 100 with fuel cell stack 1; [0025]; [0029]), and a metering system (109) for metering gas from the compressed gas tank (101) into the energy converter (107) ([0047-48]; see also at least [0053] teaching at least that “anode pressure control value 24 is controlled to open and close by the controller 101. By this open/close control, a pressure of the anode gas to be supplied to the fuel cell stack 1 is adjusted” in view of [0198] teaching that the adjustment is part of a stack request flow rate calculation for metering/calculating fuel flow rate to the cell via gas supplying device 20; see figs. 1 and 6-7; see also [0082]), wherein the determining method (300) comprises: a determining step (301) in which a pressure (see at least [0171]) and a temperature in the compressed gas tank (101) are determined (see at least [0168]; see also [0175-176]; see also fig. 5), a modeling step (303) in which a change of gas flowing from the compressed gas tank (101) into the metering system (109) is modeled by means of a mathematical model (200) ([0164]; see fig. 5 showing the modeled calculation of gas temperature in the metering system in view of fig. 1; see also [0168-174] including [0174] “gas temperature calculation unit 346 calculates the gas temperature”), a calculation step (305) in which a temperature of the gas flowing into the metering system (109) is calculated by means of the mathematical model (200) ([0172-176] including [0174] “gas temperature calculation unit 346 calculates the gas temperature” as well as equation 1 in [0175-176] teaching that pressure is at least in part “calculated on the basis of the post-joining gas temperature calculated by the post-joining gas temperature calculation unit 346”; see fig. 5 showing the modeled calculation of gas temperature in a model in the metering system in view of fig. 1), and a providing step (307) for providing the calculated temperature of the gas flowing into the metering system (109) to a supplementary system (see at least fig. 5 showing the calculated temperature(s) is/are provided to a further / supplementary system). Hoshi does not directly and specifically state that the model models an isenthalpic state change (teaching regarding a related gas enthalpy calculation – see at least [0168]). However, Yang teaches analysis of thermodynamic processes involving hydrogen (title – all throughout) including modeling an isenthalpic state change (heading 2.2 - pp.4415 to 4417). Therefore, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to modify the drive system having control via calculation/modeling of gas enthalpy of Hoshi with the knowledge taught regard isenthalpic expansion modeling and curves especially for hydrogen of Yang. This is because such isenthalpic expansion modeling allows for modeling throttled gas expansion for controlling the release of e.g. hydrogen (2.2 of Yang; see also [0044] of Hoshi). This is important in order to properly control and supply a fuel cell for powering a vehicle safely (see abstract pf Yang and [0029] of Hoshi). Regarding claim 10, Hoshi teaches a vehicle (400) (see at least [0003] and [0029]) comprising a drive system (100) according to claim 1 (see treatment of claim 1 above). Regarding claim 11, Hoshi teaches a tank system (500) (high-pressure tank 21 in gas supplying device 20 with temperature/pressure sensors 41/42; [0048] “gas supplying/discharging device 20 includes a high-pressure tank 21”; see also [0054] and [0081]; see also fig. 1 showing a representation the tank with sensors, valves and pump) for supplying a gas (at least hydrogen – see [0032]; [0170-171]) to a metering system (109) ([0047-48]; see also at least [0053] teaching at least that “anode pressure control value 24 is controlled to open and close by the controller 101. By this open/close control, a pressure of the anode gas to be supplied to the fuel cell stack 1 is adjusted” in view of [0198] teaching that the adjustment is part of a stack request flow rate calculation for metering/calculating fuel flow rate to the cell via gas supplying device 20; see figs. 1 and 6-7; see also [0082]) of an energy converter (107) (fuel cell system 100 with fuel cell stack 1; [0025]; [0029]), wherein the tank system (500) comprises: a compressed gas tank (501) with a pressure sensor (503) and a temperature sensor (505) (high-pressure tank 21 in gas supplying device 20 with temperature/pressure sensors 41/42; [0048] “gas supplying/discharging device 20 includes a high-pressure tank 21”; see also [0054] and [0081]; see also fig. 1 showing a representation the tank with sensors, valves and pump), and a control device (507) (101 with 102; [0080]; [0092] “controller 101 includes a system control unit 102”), wherein the control device (507) is configured to calculate (see fig. 2 in view of fig. 5 showing that the model and calculating units are part of control device 101/102) a temperature of gas flowing in the metering system (109) of the energy converter (107) by means of a mathematical model (200) that models change of a gas flowing from the compressed gas tank into the metering system (109) of the energy converter (107) ([0164]; see fig. 5 showing the modeled calculation of gas temperature in the metering system in view of fig. 1; see also [0168-174] including [0174] “gas temperature calculation unit 346 calculates the gas temperature”), wherein the control device (507) is further configured to provide measured values determined by means of the pressure sensor (503) and the temperature sensor (505) as input values to the mathematical model (200) (see at least [0168] and [0175-176] teaching regarding input pressure and temperature values; see also figs. 2 and 5), wherein the control device (507) is further configured to provide the calculated temperature of the gas flowing into the metering system (109) to a supplementary system (see at least fig. 5 showing the calculated temperature(s) is/are provided to a further / supplementary system). Hoshi does not directly and specifically state that the model models an isenthalpic state change (teaching regarding a related gas enthalpy calculation – see at least [0168]). However, Yang teaches analysis of thermodynamic processes involving hydrogen (title – all throughout) including modeling an isenthalpic state change (heading 2.2 - pp.4415 to 4417). Therefore, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to modify the drive system having control via calculation/modeling of gas enthalpy of Hoshi with the knowledge taught regard isenthalpic expansion modeling and curves especially for hydrogen of Yang. This is because such isenthalpic expansion modeling allows for modeling throttled gas expansion for controlling the release of e.g. hydrogen (2.2 of Yang; see also [0044] of Hoshi). This is important in order to properly control and supply a fuel cell for powering a vehicle safely (see abstract pf Yang and [0029] of Hoshi). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. See PTO-892. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to PHILIP COTEY whose telephone number is (571)270-1029. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9-5. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Laura Martin can be reached at 571-272-2160. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /PHILIP L COTEY/ Examiner, Art Unit 2855 /NATHANIEL T WOODWARD/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2855
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 02, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 15, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103, §Other (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12693171
TEMPERATURE SENSORS
2y 3m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12685084
DIELECTRIC SPECTROSCOPY TEMPERATURE MONITORING USING ELECTROSTATIC CHUCK
2y 11m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12680883
TEMPERATURE ESTIMATION METHOD, TEMPERATURE ESTIMATION PROGRAM AND TEMPERATURE ESTIMATION DEVICE
2y 10m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12669382
SUBSTRATE TEMPERATURE MEASURING DEVICE, SUBSTRATE PROCESSING APPARATUS INCLUDING THE SAME, AND SUBSTRATE TEMPERATURE MEASURING METHOD USING THE SAME
3y 1m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12663320
TEMPERATURE MEASUREMENT DEVICE, THERMOMETER, TEMPERATURE MEASUREMENT METHOD, AND TEMPERATURE ATTENUATION MEASUREMENT METHOD
3y 0m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
84%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+21.2%)
2y 5m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 774 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month