Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/576,424

DEVICE FOR THE CONTACTLESS DETECTION OF MOVEMENTS

Final Rejection §102
Filed
Jan 04, 2024
Priority
Jul 14, 2021 — DE 10 2021 118 230.1 +2 more
Examiner
AURORA, REENA
Art Unit
2858
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Schaeffler Technologies AG & Co. Kg
OA Round
2 (Final)
87%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
73%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 87% — above average
87%
Career Allowance Rate
1019 granted / 1172 resolved
+18.9% vs TC avg
Minimal -14% lift
Without
With
+-13.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
22 currently pending
Career history
1198
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.7%
-38.3% vs TC avg
§103
34.1%
-5.9% vs TC avg
§102
31.1%
-8.9% vs TC avg
§112
18.6%
-21.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1172 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . This communication is in response to amendment received on 12/20/2025. Claims 1 – 3, 6 – 8, 11 – 13 and 16 – 18 are presented for examination. Claims 4 – 5, 9 – 10 and 14 – 15 have been canceled by the applicant. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 12/20/2025 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Applicant’s argument that “Applicant submits that Sugitani does not show, teach or suggest that a seal of a rolling bearing is a transmitter having the structure recited in respective independent claims 1 and 11.”. Examiner respectfully disagrees with applicant’s argument because there is no such limitation in the claim that transmitter is a seal of a rolling bearing. Applicant must recite the argued features in the claim if applicant wishes these features to be given patentable weight. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1 – 3, 6 – 8, 11 - 13 and 16 - 18 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Sugitani (6,147,487). As to claim 1, Sugitani discloses a magnetic rotation detector for detecting characteristic of a rotary member comprising a device for contactlessly detecting rotational (Col. 1, lines 8 - 11) or linear movements, the device comprising a stationary magnetoresistive sensor (30), (Col. 1, lines 43 - 44) and a transmitter (10), wherein the transmitter has sections which are alternatingly inversely magnetized along a trajectory (in the circumferential direction) extending in a first spatial direction, and magnetic poles of said sections opposing each other in a second spatial direction (the axial spatial direction) orthogonal to the first spatial direction (Fig. 22B), wherein the sensor is spaced from the transmitter by a gap in the second spatial direction (Fig. 21B), and the sections of the transmitter have an extent in a third spatial direction (the radial spatial direction) orthogonal to the first and second spatial directions, wherein the sections of the transmitter are magnetized over a length in the third spatial direction that is shorter than their extent in the third spatial direction, and transmitter is a seal (magnetic rotary element 10 is mounted on to a cylindrical rotor 53) (Fig. 30[A]-[C] show magnetized elements 10 which are shorter in the radial direction than the cast element 11 in which they are embedded; Col. 15, lines 46 - 55). PNG media_image1.png 878 510 media_image1.png Greyscale As to claim 11, Sugitani discloses a magnetic rotation detector for detecting characteristic of a rotary member comprising a transmitter (10) configured as a seal on a component (53) of the rolling bearing the transmitter having sections, the sections: being alternatingly inversely magnetized along a trajectory extending in a first spatial direction (in the circumferential direction); comprising respective magnetic poles that oppose each other in a second spatial direction (the axial spatial direction), orthogonal to the first spatial direction (Fig. 21B); and comprising an extent in a third spatial direction (the radial spatial direction) orthogonal to the first spatial direction and to the second spatial direction, the sections being magnetized over a length in the third spatial direction that is less than the extent; and a magnetoresistive sensor (30) spaced from the transmitter (10) by a gap in the second spatial direction, the magnetoresistive sensor being stationary (Fig. 30[A]-[C] show magnetized elements 10 which are shorter in the radial direction than the cast element 11 in which they are embedded; Col. 15, lines 46 - 55). As to claims 2 and 12, Sugitani discloses that the first spatial direction is a circumferential direction (in the circumferential direction), the second spatial direction (the axial spatial direction) is an axial direction and the third spatial direction is a radial direction (the radial spatial direction) of a cylindrical coordinate system (Fig. 30(A)-(C)). As to claims 3 and 13, Sugitani discloses that the first spatial direction is an X- direction (in the circumferential direction), the second spatial direction is a Z- direction (the axial spatial direction) and the third spatial direction is a Y- direction (the radial spatial direction) of a Cartesian coordinate system (Fig. 30(A)-(C)). As to claims 6 and 16, Sugitani discloses the transmitter (10) is arranged on a surface of the rolling bearing, the surface normal of which points in an axial direction [Col. 10, lines 7 - 16]. As to claims 7 and 17, Sugitani discloses that the transmitter (10) is made from an elastomer (Col. 22, lines 31 - 33). As to claims 8 and 18, Sugitani discloses that the magnetoresistive region (10, 30) of the sensor (Col. 1, lines 43 - 44) is arranged in the third spatial direction (the radial spatial direction) centrally or immediately adjacent to the center (L1) of the magnetized length of the sections of the transmitter (Fig. 21(A), 21(B)). Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to REENA AURORA whose telephone number is (571)272-2263. The examiner can normally be reached M-F: 8:00AM-5:00PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Lee Rodak can be reached at 5712705628. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /REENA AURORA/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2858
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 04, 2024
Application Filed
Oct 01, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
Dec 16, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Dec 18, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Dec 20, 2025
Response Filed
Apr 07, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102
May 13, 2026
Interview Requested

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12638469
Magnetic Field Speed Sensor Output Signal Protocol
2y 11m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12631667
ELECTRICITY METER
1y 10m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12625161
Semiconductor Module Inspection Device
2y 2m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12618661
REDUCING STRAY MAGNETIC FIELD EFFECT ON AN ANGLE SENSOR
3y 3m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12618692
ROTARY INDUCTIVE POSITION SENSING WITH 60° PHASE-SHIFTED SENSE SIGNALS, AND RELATED APPARATUSES AND METHODS
2y 2m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
87%
Grant Probability
73%
With Interview (-13.7%)
2y 5m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1172 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month