Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/576,430

CABLE CONNECTOR

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Jan 04, 2024
Examiner
PAUMEN, GARY F
Art Unit
2834
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Ls Electric Co. Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
88%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 10m
To Grant
87%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 88% — above average
88%
Career Allow Rate
1706 granted / 1930 resolved
+20.4% vs TC avg
Minimal -2% lift
Without
With
+-1.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 10m
Avg Prosecution
56 currently pending
Career history
1986
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.9%
-39.1% vs TC avg
§103
66.3%
+26.3% vs TC avg
§102
19.0%
-21.0% vs TC avg
§112
2.1%
-37.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1930 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Objections Claims 1 and 5 are objected to because of the following informalities: in claim 1, line 5, “is formed” should be deleted. In claim 5, line “fixing groove” should be – coupling groove— to agree with the specification. Appropriate correction is required. 35 USC 102 Rejections The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 3, 6 and 7 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by DE 102020208659. Regarding claim 1, DE ‘659 discloses a cable connector which connects a lug 16,16A formed on one end of a cable (unnumbered) and including a protruding portion 16,16A having a diameter greater than a diameter of the cable to a circuit board installed in a case (paragraph 0009), the cable connector comprising: a first member 12 which is fixed to the case and in which a through-hole 20 into which the cable is inserted; and a second member 14 which is installed on one side of the first member and in which a coupling port 18 to which the protruding portion of the lug is coupled is formed, wherein the second member includes a first lug fixing part 32 formed to protrude in an inward direction of the coupling port on an entrance of the coupling port adjacent to the first member. Regarding claim 3, DE ‘659 discloses a shape of a cross section of the coupling port 18 corresponds to a shape of a cross section of the protruding portion of the lug 16,16A. Regarding claim 6, DE ‘659 (Figure 7) discloses a reinforcement part (unnumbered, immediately below reference numeral 58) protruding in an outward direction of the cable is formed on an outer circumferential surface of the first member 12. Regarding claim 7, DE ‘659 discloses the first member 12 is formed of an elastic material; and the second member 14 is formed of a rigid plastic material. 35 USC 103 Rejections The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 5 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over DE 102020208659 as applied to claim 1 above, and further in view of Trout et al 7270562. Regarding claim 5, Trout et al (Figure 5) discloses a fixing groove 302 is formed on case 262; and a fixing protrusion 292 insertion-coupled to the fixing groove is formed on first member 132, and to provide DE ‘659 with a fixing groove receiving a fixing protrusion thus would have been obvious, to prevent separation of the first member from the case. To place the fixing protrusion on the case, and the fixing groove on the first member of DE ‘659, would have been an obvious reversal of parts not substantially affecting the function thereof. Claim(s) 8 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over DE 102020208659 as applied to claim 1 above, and further in view of Nawa 8545264. Nawa (front page) discloses a cable guide 36 communicating with the through-hole is formed in the first member to guide the cable into the through-hole; and a sealing part 21 formed to prevent dust or moisture from penetrating an inside of the through-hole is provided on the cable guide, and to provide DE ‘659 with same thus would have been obvious, to prevent ingress of contaminants. Claims Defining Over Prior Art Claims 2, 4 and 9 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: none of the prior art discloses or teaches a third member installed on one side of the second member, wherein a coupling hole to which an end portion of the lug is coupled is formed in the third member, and a second lug fixing part protruding in an inward direction of the coupling hole is formed in the coupling hole; in combination with the rest of the subject matter of the independent claim. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to GARY F PAUMEN whose telephone number is (571)272-2013. The examiner can normally be reached M-Th. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Christopher Koehler can be reached at 571-272-3560. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /GARY F PAUMEN/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2834
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 04, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 11, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12603450
CABLE CONNECTOR SYSTEMS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12597742
ELECTRIC VEHICLE SUPPLY EQUIPMENT AND POWER CORD
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12597735
LOCK MECHANISM AND CONNECTOR SET
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12597736
ELECTRICAL CONNECTOR AND ELECTRICAL CONNECTOR ASSEMBLY HAVING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12597723
CONTACT ASSEMBLY HAVING CABLE CONTACTS AND CONNECTOR CONTACTS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
88%
Grant Probability
87%
With Interview (-1.7%)
1y 10m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1930 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month