Office Action Predictor
Last updated: April 16, 2026
Application No. 18/576,481

FEEDER SETUP DEVICE AND FEEDER SETUP SYSTEM

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jan 04, 2024
Examiner
ADAMS, GREGORY W
Art Unit
3652
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Fuji Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
75%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 4m
To Grant
87%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 75% — above average
75%
Career Allow Rate
1033 granted / 1380 resolved
+22.9% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+12.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
24 currently pending
Career history
1404
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
60.4%
+20.4% vs TC avg
§102
15.4%
-24.6% vs TC avg
§112
17.5%
-22.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1380 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1, 3, 6 & 7 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Neri (US 5,474,251) in view of Rittershaus (US 5,209,247). With respect to claims 1 & 3, Neri discloses a feeder setup device comprising: a feeder holding section 1 configured to hold, at a work execution position in a vertical posture, vertically oriented tape feeders 7, 7, 7 to which a reel 11a around which a carrier tape 5 is wound is attached, a tape feeder being configured to feed a carrier tape to supply a component; a reel holding section 10 configured to hold a plurality of reels in upright, stacked configuration, e.g. posture; and a reel attachment mechanism 12, 17 configured to take out a reel from a reel holding section, and attach a reel to a tape feeder at a work execution position. Neri discloses a reel holding section and a reel attachment mechanism, and does not disclose reels in a lying down posture or a reel attachment mechanism that changes reels to a vertical posture from a lying down posture. With respect to FIGS. 5A, 5B, Rittershaus discloses a feeder holding section (indicated generally as 15a, 15b), a reel holding section 102 configured to hold stacked reels 30 in a lying down posture, and a reel attachment mechanism 14c, 14d configured to take out a reel from a reel holding section, change a reel to a vertical posture, and attach a reel to a tape feeder at a work execution position. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine the invention of Neri to include reels in a lying down posture or a reel attachment mechanism that changes reels to a vertical posture from a lying down posture, as taught by Rittershaus, which, due to the configuration of the process facility, allows a robot to transfer the pallets of reels directly to the feeder holding sections. With respect to claims 6 & 7, Neri does not disclose a reel removal mechanism configured to remove a reel from a tape feeder at a work execution position. Rittershaus discloses a reel removal mechanism 20 configured to remove a reel from an "empty" tape feeder at a work execution position, wherein reel attachment mechanism 14c and a reel removal mechanism 20 are operable independently of each other. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine the invention of Neri to include a reel removal mechanism configured to remove a reel from an "empty" tape feeder at a work execution position, wherein reel attachment mechanism and a reel removal mechanism are operable independently of each other, as taught by Rittershaus, which, due to the configuration of the process facility, allows a robot to transfer the pallets of reels directly to the feeder holding sections. Claim(s) 2 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Neri in view of Rittershaus and further in view of Yoichi (JP 2019204858) (English translation included with reference copy). Neri discloses a feeder accommodation section configured to accommodate multiple tape feeders 7, 7, 7 in a vertical posture, and does not disclose a feeder conveyance section. Yoichi discloses a feeder conveyance section 5 which conveys tape feeders 6 between a feeder accommodation section 4 and a feeder holding section. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine the invention of Neri to include a feeder conveyance section, as taught by Yoichi, which removes the requirement that a worker replace the tape feeder or otherwise collect the waste tape from the waste tape collection box of the mounting apparatus. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 10 & 11 are allowed. Claims 4, 5, 8 & 9 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to GREGORY W ADAMS whose telephone number is (571)272-8101. The examiner can normally be reached Mon - Fri, 8am-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Saul Rodriguez can be reached at (571)272-7097. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /GREGORY W ADAMS/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3652
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 04, 2024
Application Filed
Dec 15, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Mar 31, 2026
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12595156
VACUUM LIFTER FOR LIFTING OBJECTS LOCATED IN CONFINED SPACES BELOW GRADE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12583692
DEVICE FOR PICKING UP PRODUCTS STACKED ON PALLETS AND METHOD FOR PICKING UP PRODUCTS STACKED ON PALLETS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12576555
APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR MOVING PAIRS OF WORKPIECES HAVING A ROUGH FACE AND AN OPPOSITE FINISHED FACE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12559206
STORAGE AND DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM FOR CONTAINERS
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12553299
System and Method for Transferring Tubulars to a Rig
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
75%
Grant Probability
87%
With Interview (+12.1%)
2y 4m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1380 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month