Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 15, 2026
Application No. 18/577,109

TELEPRESENCE DEVICES, SYSTEMS AND METHODS

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Jan 05, 2024
Priority
Jul 23, 2021 — provisional 63/224,912 +2 more
Examiner
SCHNURR, JOHN R
Art Unit
2425
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Amgen Inc.
OA Round
4 (Non-Final)
72%
Grant Probability
Favorable
4-5
OA Rounds
1m
Est. Remaining
83%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 72% — above average
72%
Career Allowance Rate
687 granted / 953 resolved
+14.1% vs TC avg
Moderate +11% lift
Without
With
+10.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
46 currently pending
Career history
988
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
5.6%
-34.4% vs TC avg
§103
55.4%
+15.4% vs TC avg
§102
17.1%
-22.9% vs TC avg
§112
10.5%
-29.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 953 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . DETAILED ACTION This Office Action is in response to the Amendment After Non-Final Rejection filed 06/05/2026. Claims 1-4, 6-11, 13-15, 17-22 and 24 are pending and have been examined. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claims 1-4, 6-11, 13-15, 17-22 and 24 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112(a): (a) IN GENERAL.—The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor or joint inventor of carrying out the invention. The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112: The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention. Claims 1-4, 6-11, 13-15, 17-22 and 24 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph, as failing to comply with the written description requirement. The claim(s) contains subject matter which was not described in the specification in such a way as to reasonably convey to one skilled in the relevant art that the inventor or a joint inventor, or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the inventor(s), at the time the application was filed, had possession of the claimed invention. The claims have been amended to introduce the limitations: a first remote device of the plurality of remote devices is paired with a first telepresence device of the one or more telepresence devices, and a first embedded webserver of the first telepresence device is configured to be unable to receive the camera control inputs from remote devices of the plurality of remote devices other than the first remote device when paired to the first remote device. Applicant indicates support for these newly presented limitations can be found in original claim 9, figures 1 and 2E, and paragraph [0045] of the originally filed disclosure. Paragraph [0045] discloses a user interface operates in two modes: observation mode wherein the user has access to the video feed but none of the camera controls; and controller mode wherein the user has access to camera controls. It is additionally disclosed that the device only allows for one controller at a time but allows multiple observers. Paragraph [0057] and claims 14, 15 provide similar disclosure. Upon review of the entirety of the originally filed disclosure no support was found for the newly added claim limitations cited above. There is no disclosure of pairing a first remote device with a first telepresence device and configuring a first embedded webserver to be unable to receive camera control inputs from remote devices other than the first paired remote device. Therefore, the claims contain subject matter which was not described in the specification in such a way as to reasonably convey to one skilled in the relevant art that the inventors, at the time the application was filed, had possession of the claimed invention. Conclusion In the case of amending the claimed invention, applicant is respectfully requested to indicate the portion(s) of the specification which dictate(s) the structure relied on for proper interpretation and also to verify and ascertain the metes and bounds of the claimed invention. Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JOHN R SCHNURR whose telephone number is (571)270-1458. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 6a-4p. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Brian Pendleton can be reached at (571)272-7527. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JOHN R SCHNURR/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2425
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 3 earlier events
Aug 27, 2025
Final Rejection mailed — §112
Dec 18, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Jan 28, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Jan 31, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Feb 26, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Jun 05, 2026
Response Filed
Jun 18, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §112
Jul 31, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12707150
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CAMERA HANDLING IN LIVE ENVIRONMENTS
2y 11m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12693515
Apparatuses, Systems And Methods For Generating Color With A Monochrome Sensor
2y 6m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12695946
METHODS AND APPARATUS TO MEASURE AUDIENCE COMPOSITION AND RECRUIT AUDIENCE MEASUREMENT PANELISTS
2y 5m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12695963
PERSONALIZED SEMANTIC FAST-FORWARD VIDEOS FOR NEXT GENERATION STREAMING PLATFORMS
1y 8m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12685444
ANALYSIS OF REFLECTED SIGNALS DURING A LASER PROCEDURE
2y 4m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

4-5
Expected OA Rounds
72%
Grant Probability
83%
With Interview (+10.7%)
2y 8m (~1m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 953 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month