Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/577,447

METHOD FOR PROCESSING MESSAGE, ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND STORAGE MEDIUM

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Jan 08, 2024
Examiner
PATEL, JAY P
Art Unit
2466
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
ZTE CORPORATION
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
84%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 9m
To Grant
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 84% — above average
84%
Career Allow Rate
777 granted / 920 resolved
+26.5% vs TC avg
Moderate +5% lift
Without
With
+5.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
35 currently pending
Career history
955
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
5.5%
-34.5% vs TC avg
§103
42.6%
+2.6% vs TC avg
§102
34.7%
-5.3% vs TC avg
§112
7.5%
-32.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 920 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-3, 8-11 and 15-16 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Mahalank (US Publication 2020/0021953 A1). In regards to claims 1 and 9-10, Mahalank (US Publication 2020/0021953 A1) teaches, a method for processing a message, comprising: receiving a short message (see paragraph 57 and figure 8; FIG. 8 is a flow chart illustrating exemplary steps for SMS-based IoT device triggering using an MTC-IWF to generate and send SMS-based IoT device trigger messages; see paragraph 58; If the IoT device is stationary, control proceeds to step 402, where the MTC-IWF generates and sends an SMS-based IoT trigger message to the serving node for the stationary IoT device); acquiring a signaling simplification flow corresponding to the short message, wherein the signaling simplification flow is generated after simplifying a signaling standard flow (see paragraph 58; For stationary IoT devices, such as utility meters, MTC-IWF 120 may be configured with the IoT device identity and, the address of the serving MME, MSC, SSP, or other serving node); and performing a signaling operation on the short message according to the signaling simplification flow (see figure 8, the determination of the successful deliver in step 406; if the delivery is successful the operation moves to step 408 and if not, the operation moves to step 410; both paths read on the signaling operation). In regards to claims 2 and 15, Mahalank teaches, wherein the step of obtaining a signaling simplification flow corresponding to the short message comprises: sending a signaling request for obtaining the signaling simplification flow to a signaling optimization module (see figure 2, line 2, paragraph 32; MTC-IWF 120 sends a subscriber information request); receiving a signaling response fed back by the signaling optimization module (see figure 2, line 3, paragraph 33; In line 3 of the message flow diagram, HSS/HLR 124 sends a subscriber information response to MTC-IWF 120); when the signaling simplification flow carried in the signaling response is available, executing a subsequent signaling operation on the short message according to the signaling simplification flow (see figure 2 lines/step 4a and the subsequent steps after step 4a); and when the signaling simplification flow carried in the signaling response is unavailable, or the signaling simplification flow is not carried, or the signaling response is not received within a pre-set time, executing a signaling operation on the short message according to the signaling standard flow corresponding to the short message (see figure 5 and paragraph 50; In line 5, MME 114 attempts to deliver the trigger message to IoT device 104 and determines that IoT device 104 is not reachable. In line 6, MME 114 responds to MTC-IWF 120 indicating that IoT device 104 is not reachable. In response, MTC-IWF 120 buffers the SMS message including the trigger message for a redelivery attempt). In regards to claims 3 and 16, Mahalank teaches wherein a process of generating the signaling simplification flow by the signaling optimization module comprises: inquiring whether history signaling cache data of a same type of history short messages sent by the short message sending end is locally cached; and when the history signaling cache data is found, simplifying the signaling standard flow based on the history signaling cache data to obtain the signaling simplification flow (see paragraph 32; In line 2 of the message flow diagram, MTC-IWF 120 sends a subscriber information request through the S6m interface to HSS/HLR 124 to resolve the external identifier or MSISDN to an international mobile station identifier (IMSI) and retrieve the related HSS stored routing information including the identities of the IoT device's serving core network (CN) node(s)). In regards to claim 8, Mahalank teaches, wherein the short message comprises any one of the following: a registration message, a deregistration message, a mobile originate message and a mobile terminated message (see paragraph 30; IoT devices are triggered using SMS message generated by SMS-SC 108). In regards to claim 11, Mahalank teaches the step of inquiring whether history signaling cache data of a same type of history short messages sent by the short message sending end is locally cached comprises: identifying the short message sending end according to an International Mobile Subscriber Identification Number (IMSI) carried in the signaling request; the IMSI is used as a key to inquiry whether history signaling cache data of the same type of history short messages sent by the short message sending end is locally cached (see paragraph 32; MTC-IWF 120 sends a subscriber information request through the S6m interface to HSS/HLR 124 to resolve the external identifier or MSISDN to an international mobile station identifier (IMSI) and retrieve the related HSS stored routing information including the identities of the IoT device's serving core network (CN) node(s)). Allowable Subject Matter & Relevant Prior Art Claims 4-7, 12-14 and 17-20 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Prior art Lu et al. (US Publication 2023/0247394 A1) teaches, a process for UE registration for SMS; the system for the process includes a SMS function. Prior art Zamora et al. (US Publication 2022/0360954 A1) teaches, in figure 6, an example of a MT-SMS delivery reattempt using a UE Ready for SMS event and SMS Registration Notification Flag. In regards to claims 4 and 17, the cited prior art fails to particularly teach, the determining of the running state as claimed. In regards to claim 7, claim 13, claim 14 and also claim 20, the cited prior art fails to particularly teach, the trigger determination being carried out based on the success rate of the delivery of the short message as claimed. In regards to claim 12, the cited prior art fails to tech, deleting a signaling part for generating the history signaling cache data from the signaling standard flow to obtain the simplified signaling flow. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JAY P PATEL whose telephone number is (571)272-3086. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9:30-6. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Faruk Hamza can be reached at 571-272-7969. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JAY P PATEL/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2466
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 08, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 20, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12598591
COMMUNICATION RESOURCE SCHEDULING METHOD AND APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12593244
METHOD AND DEVICE FOR RADIO RESOURCE DETERMINATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12587951
PROVISIONING HEADLESS WIFI DEVICES AND RELATED SYSTEMS, METHODS AND DEVICES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12581418
TERMINAL DEVICE AND WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12574273
CONFIGURATION OF TYPE INFORMATION FOR APPDU IN WIRELESS LAN SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
84%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+5.4%)
2y 9m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 920 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month