Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/577,477

INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEM, AND INFORMATION PROCESSING PROGRAM

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Aug 16, 2024
Examiner
CHEN, CHIA WEI A
Art Unit
2637
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Konica Minolta Inc.
OA Round
2 (Final)
77%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 6m
To Grant
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 77% — above average
77%
Career Allow Rate
497 granted / 647 resolved
+14.8% vs TC avg
Strong +20% interview lift
Without
With
+19.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
25 currently pending
Career history
672
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.7%
-36.3% vs TC avg
§103
48.3%
+8.3% vs TC avg
§102
30.2%
-9.8% vs TC avg
§112
10.2%
-29.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 647 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to the claim(s) have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Shibahara (US 2017/0111565 A1) in view of DeAngelis (US 2009/0141138 A1). Claim 1, Shibahara teaches an information processing system comprising: a terminal device (terminal device 110A; paragraph 0071) including: a wireless communicator that performs communication through a fifth-generation mobile communication system (fifth generation 5G; paragraph 0262), a sensor including a camera (photographing unit 114; paragraph 0102); a global navigation satellite system receiver that receives a signal from a global navigation satellite system (position of the camera can be acquired with a GPS sensor in the camera; paragraph 0204), and a clocking part (clock 121) that receives, as clocking information, a signal from a global navigation satellite system (GPS timepiece is used as clock; paragraph 0113); a hardware processor that performs communication with the terminal device through the fifth-generation mobile communication system (fifth generation 5G; paragraph 0262); and a data processor that associates a plurality of pieces of data (timestamp is added, i.e., associated, with image data; paragraph 0079), in a case where a communication delay (delay time is determined; paragraph 0091-0092) between the terminal device and the hardware processor is not more than a predetermined time (if there is no delay between the terminal device 110c and server 120, no adjustment to clock 111a of terminal device is made and the time for image timestamps is identical to the time of clock 111a of the terminal device; see paragraph 0091 and 0057), such that data of the terminal device is data at a time identical to a time of the data of the terminal device (the data time stamp is identical to the time that the image is generated; see paragraph 0079), but Shibahara is silent regarding wherein the clocking part receives the clocking information from the signal from the global navigation satellite system receiver. DeAngelis teaches wherein a camera comprises a clocking part (clock in camera control 654; paragraph 0062) receives clocking information from the signal from the global navigation satellite system receiver (GPS time data is inherently encoded in each GPS message sent from a GPS satellite. Synchronization of a clock in camera control 654 of camera 618 can be accomplished using its own GPS receiver; paragraph 0062). It would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have used the teaching of DeAngelis with that of Shibahara in order to ensure accurate timekeeping even when a network connection to an external device is unstable. Claim 2, Shibahara further teaches wherein the terminal device includes a plurality of terminal devices (see multiple cameras; Fig. 12), and the data processor selects a terminal device from among the plurality of terminal devices (processing apparatus 3x101 selects a camera; paragraph 0209), based on positional information regarding each of the plurality of terminal devices obtained from the global navigation satellite system (selection is based on position of a camera, coordinates may be identified by GPS; paragraph 0209, 0262), such that the plurality of data is associated together (see time stamp of images; paragraph 0079). Claim 3, Shibahara further teaches wherein the plurality of pieces of data includes image data shot by the camera (still or moving image is photographed; paragraph 0095). Claim 4, Shibahara further teaches wherein the clocking unit part updates the clocking information within the predetermined time (every time a clock time based on the reference is updated, the first terminal device may photograph a subject displaying the updated clock time; paragraph 0054, 0057). Claim 5, Shibahara further teaches wherein the plurality of pieces of data includes image data (still or moving image is photographed; paragraph 0095), and the predetermined time is less than a time for one frame (accuracy of one-hundredth second while an imaging frame rate can be 30 or 60 fps; see paragraph 0057, 0164). Claim 11, Shibahara further teaches wherein the plurality of pieces of data includes image data shot by the camera (still or moving image is photographed; paragraph 0095). Claim 12, Shibahara further teaches wherein the clocking part updates the clocking information within the predetermined time (every time a clock time based on the reference is updated, the first terminal device may photograph a subject displaying the updated clock time; paragraph 0054, 0057). Claim 13, Shibahara further teaches wherein the plurality of pieces of data includes image data, and the predetermined time is less than a time for one frame (accuracy of one-hundredth second while an imaging frame rate can be 30 or 60 fps; see paragraph 0057, 0164). Claim 14, Shibahara further teaches wherein the clocking part updates the clocking information within the predetermined time (every time a clock time based on the reference is updated, the first terminal device may photograph a subject displaying the updated clock time; paragraph 0054, 0057). Claim 15, Shibahara further teaches wherein the plurality of pieces of data includes image data, and the predetermined time is less than a time for one frame (accuracy of one-hundredth second while an imaging frame rate can be 30 or 60 fps; see paragraph 0057, 0164). Claim 16, Shibahara further teaches wherein the plurality of pieces of data includes image data, and the predetermined time is less than a time for one frame (accuracy of one-hundredth second while an imaging frame rate can be 30 or 60 fps; see paragraph 0057, 0164). Claims 6-10 and 17-20 are analyzed and rejected as claims requiring a non-transitory recording medium storing a computer readable information processing program (see paragraph 0013 of Shibahara) for causing a computer to execute the functions of the system of claims 1-5 and 11-14, respectively. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CHIAWEI A CHEN whose telephone number is (571)270-1707. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri 12:00pm - 9:00pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Sinh Tran can be reached at (571)272-7564. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CHIAWEI CHEN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2637
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 16, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 19, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Nov 07, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Feb 10, 2026
Response Filed
Mar 12, 2026
Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12604090
INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, AND STORAGE MEDIUM
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12589977
APPARATUS FOR INFORMATION COLLECTION, CARGO HANDLING METHOD, AND MONITORING SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12574622
IMAGE CAPTURE APPARATUS INCLUDING A MULTI-FUNCTION INTERCONNECT MECHANISM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12563298
SHAKE CORRECTION DEVICE AND IMAGING APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12556788
ELECTRONIC MODULE AND IMAGING APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
77%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+19.5%)
2y 6m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 647 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month