Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 06, 2026
Application No. 18/577,644

LONG-ACTING BREXPIPRAZOLE PREPARATION FOR INJECTION AND PREPARATION METHOD THEREFOR

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Jan 08, 2024
Priority
Sep 07, 2021 — CN 202111043276.4 +1 more
Examiner
NOLAN, JASON MICHAEL
Art Unit
1617
Tech Center
1600 — Biotechnology & Organic Chemistry
Assignee
Sichuan Kelun Pharmaceutical Research Institute Co. Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
66%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1m
Est. Remaining
38%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 66% — above average
66%
Career Allowance Rate
246 granted / 371 resolved
+6.3% vs TC avg
Minimal -28% lift
Without
With
+-28.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
48 currently pending
Career history
421
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.1%
-35.9% vs TC avg
§103
25.3%
-14.7% vs TC avg
§102
21.1%
-18.9% vs TC avg
§112
32.9%
-7.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 371 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION A restriction requirement was mailed 20 February 2026 (“Office Action”). Applicant’s reply to the Office Action was received 7 April 2026 (“Reply”). Status of the Claims The listing of claims filed 8 January 2024 via Preliminary Amendment has been examined. Claims 1–15 are pending. Claims 3–7, 9, and 15 are amended. Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of claims 1–9 (Group I) in the Reply is acknowledged. Claims 10–15 (Group II), directed to a non-elected invention, are withdrawn. Priority The instant application was filed 8 January 2024; is a national stage application of PCT/CN2022/115484, filed 28 August 2022, and claims priority to CN 202111043276.4, filed 7 September 2021. Applicant’s claim for foreign priority is acknowledged, and a copy of the priority document has been received. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statements (IDS) submitted on 8 January 2024; 9 December 2024; and 21 November 2025 are acknowledged and have been considered. Objections to the Specification The abstract is objected to because it recites legal phraseology (“comprising”). Appropriate correction is required. For guidelines for the preparation of patent abstracts, see MPEP § 608.01(b) (Explaining: The abstract should be in narrative form and avoid legal phraseology (e.g., means, said), terms referring to purported merits of the invention (e.g., new, novel), and phrases that can be implied (e.g., The disclosure concerns, The disclosure defined by this invention). The language should be clear and concise, and not repeat information given in the title. It should not compare the invention with the prior art. The abstract is generally limited to a single paragraph within the range of 50 to 150 words in length.). Notice of AIA Status The instant application, filed on or after 16 March 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (AIA ). Claim Rejections - 35 U.S.C. § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. § 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. Claims 1–9 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112(b) as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. A broad limitation together with a narrow limitation that falls within the broad limitation (in the same claim) may be considered indefinite if the resulting claim does not clearly set forth the metes and bounds of the patent protection desired. See MPEP § 2173.05(c). Claim 1 (step a) recites a list of solvents followed by “preferably selected from . . .” Claim 1 (step c) recites a number of washings followed by “preferably 10 to 15 . . .” Claim 3 recites a temperature range followed by “preferably 50°C . . .” Claim 4 recites a volume ratio followed by “preferably 10:1 . . .” Claim 5 recites a pumping velocity followed by “preferably 70 ml/min . . . such as . . .” Claim 6 recites a temperature range followed by “preferably 0°C . . .” Claim 7 recites a velocity range followed by “preferably 500 rpm . . .” Claim 8 recites a velocity range followed by “preferably 1.57m/s . . .” Claim 9 recites a particle binder followed by “such as sodium chloride.” The claims are considered indefinite because there is a question or doubt as to whether the feature introduced by such narrower language is (a) merely exemplary of the remainder of the claim, and therefore not required, or (b) a required feature of the claims. Dependent claim 2 incorporates all limitations from claim 1 without resolving the issues. Appropriate correction is required. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1–9 are rejected above, but would be allowable if rewritten to overcome the formal issues. The closest prior art reference is AU 2013253518 (English language translation of CN107536802, cited in IDS; “Otsuka”). Otsuka discloses a general method of preparing an injection of brexpiprazole comprising dissolving a vehicle in water and suspending the compound therein. (Otsuka , p.30). Otsuka discloses a specific method of preparing an injection of brexpiprazole comprising dissolving a vehicle (PEG, sodium chloride, DL-methionine, sodium dihydrogen phosphate dihydrate, disodium hydrogen phosphate dodecahydrate, and polysorbate) in water, filtering the resulting solution, and adding the compound to the solution to make a suspension. (Id., pp.45–46). These methods do not disclose or suggest dissolving brexpiprazole in a solvent, adding that solution to an anti-solvent to precipitate brexipiprazole, filtering, and drying or dispersing the solid, as claimed. Communication Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Jason Nolan at (571) 272-2480. The examiner can normally be reached Monday through Friday between 9:00–5:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to submit an Automated Interview Request: http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Adam Milligan, can be reached on 571-270-7674. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /J.M.N./Patent Examiner, Art Unit 1623 /GEORGE W KOSTURKO/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1621
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 08, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 28, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12643903
BIFUNCTIONAL COMPOUNDS FOR DEGRADATION OF EGFR AND RELATED METHODS OF USE
3y 2m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Patent 12643854
PROCESS FOR PREPARING A CRYSTALLINE FORM OF FLUVASTATIN SODIUM SALT
2y 2m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Patent 12583824
6-MEMBERED HETEROARYLAMINOSULFONAMIDES FOR TREATING DISEASES AND CONDITIONS MEDIATED BY DEFICIENT CFTR ACTIVITY
3y 10m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12570661
Isoform-Specific Aldehyde Dehydrogenase Inhibitors
3y 4m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12565483
OXOPYRROLIDINE UREA FPR2 AGONISTS
3y 0m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
66%
Grant Probability
38%
With Interview (-28.0%)
2y 8m (~1m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 371 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month