Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 14, 2026
Application No. 18/578,147

SEALING RING WITH LOCKING AGAINST TRANSLATIONAL MOVEMENT

Final Rejection §102
Filed
Jan 10, 2024
Priority
Jul 16, 2021 — FR FR2107699 +1 more
Examiner
TORRES WILLIAMS, MELANIE
Art Unit
3616
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Tallano Technologies
OA Round
2 (Final)
85%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 85% — above average
85%
Career Allowance Rate
654 granted / 771 resolved
+32.8% vs TC avg
Moderate +11% lift
Without
With
+11.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
23 currently pending
Career history
795
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
39.2%
-0.8% vs TC avg
§102
41.8%
+1.8% vs TC avg
§112
14.9%
-25.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 771 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Drawings Figures 17-18 should be designated by a legend such as --Prior Art-- because only that which is old is illustrated. See MPEP § 608.02(g). Corrected drawings in compliance with 37 CFR 1.121(d) are required in reply to the Office action to avoid abandonment of the application. The replacement sheet(s) should be labeled “Replacement Sheet” in the page header (as per 37 CFR 1.84(c)) so as not to obstruct any portion of the drawing figures. If the changes are not accepted by the examiner, the applicant will be notified and informed of any required corrective action in the next Office action. The objection to the drawings will not be held in abeyance. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 11 and 15-17 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Maistre et al. (WO2020094962 A1). Re claims 11 and 17, Maistre et al. disclose a friction assembly for a braking system for railway rolling stock and a method for securing at least one connecting ring mounted on a brake head to a manifold bloc connected to a suction device, comprising: a brake head (3) comprising a lower face (31), an upper face (32), and at least one secondary channel (see below) having a central axis, the at least one secondary channel connecting connects said lower face and an upper face; at least one plate (2) made of a friction material and comprising a first face (21) which is the friction face, a second face (22) which is adapted to be fixed on said lower face by a fixing mechanism (4, 5), and at least one primary channel (28), wherein the at least one primary channel connects said first face to said second face; at least one connecting ring (8), a respective ring of the at least one connecting ring being arranged in a respective secondary channel of said at least one secondary channel; a manifold block (70) connected to a suction device (pipe 50 connects to suction which is not shown) and being integral with the manifold block at said upper face, said manifold block having a cavity which is connected to the suction device and which comprises at least one hole, the at least one hole connecting said cavity to said upper face, and a respective hole of the at least one hole being aligned with a respective secondary channel of the at least one secondary channel, wherein a respective connecting ring of the at least one ring is configured to slide in a respective hole of the at least one hole; and a securing mechanism (815) for securing said at least one connecting ring to said manifold block when said at least one connecting ring is arranged in said at least one hole and in said at least one secondary channel. (Fig. 7) The cavity is interpreted as the larger portion of element 70 extending beyond surface 32. The hole is interpreted as the portion opening at surface 32. [AltContent: arrow][AltContent: textbox (Hole)][AltContent: textbox (cavity)][AltContent: arrow][AltContent: arrow][AltContent: textbox (secondary channel)] PNG media_image1.png 308 412 media_image1.png Greyscale Re claim 15, Maistre et al. disclose a return mechanism (90) which is adapted to press said connecting ring (8) against said second face. Re claim 16, Maistre et al. disclose wherein said fixing mechanism (4, 5) comprises a receiving slide (5) which is formed on said lower face, and a dovetail section (5) which is formed on said second face and which is configured to engage with said receiving slide. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 12-14 and 18-20 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Lupica et al. and Adamczak et al. ‘573 teach similar devices. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MELANIE TORRES WILLIAMS whose telephone number is (571)272-7127. The examiner can normally be reached Tuesday - Friday 7:00AM-3:00PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Robert Siconolfi can be reached at 571-272-7124. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MELANIE TORRES WILLIAMS/ Primary Examiner Art Unit 3616 MTW March 4, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 10, 2024
Application Filed
Mar 12, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
Jun 12, 2026
Response Filed
Aug 11, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12692917
COVERING PLATE AND BRAKE CALIPER BODY ASSEMBLY WITH A COVERING PLATE
2y 10m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12691861
DIAGNOSTIC METHOD AND BRAKING SYSTEM INCLUDING A UNIT FOR PERFORMING THE DIAGNOSTIC METHOD
2y 9m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12679319
VEHICLE WITH PARKING BRAKE SYSTEM
3y 7m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12673646
PNEUMATIC BRAKE PEDAL MODULE
3y 11m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12668286
BRAKING SYSTEM FOR A VEHICLE
3y 8m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
85%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+11.4%)
2y 6m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 771 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month