Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/578,147

SEALING RING WITH LOCKING AGAINST TRANSLATIONAL MOVEMENT

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Jan 10, 2024
Examiner
TORRES WILLIAMS, MELANIE
Art Unit
3616
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Tallano Technologies
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
85%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 8m
To Grant
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 85% — above average
85%
Career Allow Rate
628 granted / 742 resolved
+32.6% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+12.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
44 currently pending
Career history
786
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
37.5%
-2.5% vs TC avg
§102
46.1%
+6.1% vs TC avg
§112
15.1%
-24.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 742 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Drawings Figures 17-18 should be designated by a legend such as --Prior Art-- because only that which is old is illustrated. See MPEP § 608.02(g). Corrected drawings in compliance with 37 CFR 1.121(d) are required in reply to the Office action to avoid abandonment of the application. The replacement sheet(s) should be labeled “Replacement Sheet” in the page header (as per 37 CFR 1.84(c)) so as not to obstruct any portion of the drawing figures. If the changes are not accepted by the examiner, the applicant will be notified and informed of any required corrective action in the next Office action. The objection to the drawings will not be held in abeyance. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 11 and 15-17 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Maistre et al. (WO2020094962 A1). Re claims 11 and 17, Maistre et al. disclose a friction assembly for a braking system for railway rolling stock and a method for securing at least one connecting ring mounted on a brake head to a manifold bloc connected to a suction device, comprising: a brake head (3) comprising a lower face (31), an upper face (32), and at least one secondary channel (see below) having a central axis, the at least one secondary channel connecting connects said lower face and an upper face; at least one plate (2) made of a friction material and comprising a first face (21) which is the friction face, a second face (22) which is adapted to be fixed on said lower face by a fixing mechanism (4, 5), and at least one primary channel (28), wherein the at least one primary channel connects said first face to said second face; at least one connecting ring (8), a respective ring of the at least one connecting ring being arranged in a respective secondary channel of said at least one secondary channel; a manifold block (70) connected to a suction device (pipe 50 connects to suction which is not shown) and being integral with the manifold block at said upper face, said manifold block having a cavity which is connected to the suction device and which comprises at least one hole, the at least one hole connecting said cavity to said upper face, and a respective hole of the at least one hole being aligned with a respective secondary channel of the at least one secondary channel, wherein a respective connecting ring of the at least one ring is configured to slide in a respective hole of the at least one hole; and a securing mechanism (815) for securing said at least one connecting ring to said manifold block when said at least one connecting ring is arranged in said at least one hole and in said at least one secondary channel. (Fig. 7) The cavity is interpreted as the larger portion of element 70 extending beyond surface 32. The hole is interpreted as the portion opening at surface 32. [AltContent: arrow][AltContent: textbox (Hole)][AltContent: textbox (cavity)][AltContent: arrow][AltContent: arrow][AltContent: textbox (secondary channel)] PNG media_image1.png 308 412 media_image1.png Greyscale Re claim 15, Maistre et al. disclose a return mechanism (90) which is adapted to press said connecting ring (8) against said second face. Re claim 16, Maistre et al. disclose wherein said fixing mechanism (4, 5) comprises a receiving slide (5) which is formed on said lower face, and a dovetail section (5) which is formed on said second face and which is configured to engage with said receiving slide. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 12-14 and 18-20 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Lupica et al. and Adamczak et al. ‘573 teach similar devices. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MELANIE TORRES WILLIAMS whose telephone number is (571)272-7127. The examiner can normally be reached Tuesday - Friday 7:00AM-3:00PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Robert Siconolfi can be reached at 571-272-7124. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MELANIE TORRES WILLIAMS/ Primary Examiner Art Unit 3616 MTW March 4, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 10, 2024
Application Filed
Mar 05, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12583421
DRUM BRAKE WITH ROTATABLE BRAKE SHOE ASSEMBLY
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12583547
METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR DETECTING THE SPEED OF A BICYCLE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12577993
REDUCED PROFILE PISTON ADJUSTER
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12570257
BRAKING SYSTEM FOR A VEHICLE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12570370
CONTROL SYSTEM FOR HUMAN-POWERED VEHICLE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
85%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+12.3%)
2y 8m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 742 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month