Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/578,785

TERMINAL CHARGING SYSTEM, TERMINAL CHARGING METHOD, AND STORAGE MEDIUM

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Jan 12, 2024
Priority
Sep 26, 2021 — CN 202111131865.8 +1 more
Examiner
OMAR, AHMED H
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
ZTE Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
75%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
89%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 75% — above average
75%
Career Allowance Rate
825 granted / 1098 resolved
+15.1% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+14.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
39 currently pending
Career history
1123
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.2%
-37.8% vs TC avg
§103
65.4%
+25.4% vs TC avg
§102
21.9%
-18.1% vs TC avg
§112
2.8%
-37.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1098 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by CHEN (US 2019/0109484 A1, hereinafter CHEN). Regarding claim 1, CHEN discloses a terminal charging system, comprising: a terminal (See Fig.2, Item#100) including a first signal ground interface configured to be connected to a signal ground of the terminal (See Fig.2, discloses Terminal 100 comprising a signal ground interface of the terminal; labeled “GND” , the signal ground interface “GND” is connected to a signal ground of the terminal); a cable including a second signal ground interface adapted to the first signal ground interface (See Fig.2, discloses a cable 300 including a ground signal ground interface L2); and a charger which charges the terminal through the cable (See Fig.2, discloses a charger 200); wherein when the terminal is charged, one end of the cable is connected to a power ground of the charger, and the other end of the cable is connected to the signal ground of the terminal through the second signal ground interface and the first signal ground interface (See Fig.2, discloses cable 300 ground wire L2 connecting signal ground of terminal 100 to power ground “GND” of charger 200). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the later invention in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art against the later invention. Claim(s) 2-4 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over CHEN in view of KITANOSAKO (US 11,023,030 B2, hereinafter KOTANOSAKO). Regarding claim 2, CHEN discloses the terminal charging system of claim 1 as discussed above, the first signal ground interface is configured by a ground pin GND (See claim 1 rejection, the first signal ground interface is the GND pin). However, CHEN does not disclose the first signal ground interface is configured by a pair of Ground (GND) pins located at symmetrical positions of the USB Type-C defined interface. KITANOSAKI discloses a charging interface comprising a USB-C interface, comprising a pair of GROUND (GND) pins located at symmetrical positions of the USB Type-C defined interface (See Fig.1, Item#101 and Col.1, lines 42-55, disclose a USB type-C cable on both ends to connect to the charger and the terminal. It is well known that a USB type-C contains a pair of GROUND (GND) pins located at symmetrical positions of the USB Type-C defined interface). CHEN and KITANOSAKI are analogous art since they both deal with terminal charging. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to modify the invention disclosed by CHEN with the teachings of KITANOSAKI by using a USB type-C interface comprising a pair of Ground pins (GND) at symmetrical positions of the USB Type-C defined interface for the benefit of providing a reversable connector that is easy for the user to plug in without the need for ensuring a specific orientation. Regarding claim 3, CHEN and KITANOSAKI disclose the terminal charging system of claim 1 as discussed above, wherein the terminal further comprises a first switch having one side connected to the signal ground of the terminal and the other side connected to a power ground of the terminal (See CHEN and Par.40 discloses data pin D+ is connected to ground via switch K2). Regarding claim 4, CHEN and KITANOSAKI disclose the terminal charging system of claim 3 as discussed above, wherein the terminal further comprises a first control module connected to the first switch and configured to control on and off of the first switch (See Par.40 and Fig.2, disclose the processor 12 controls the switch K2 to connect the D+ to ground). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 5-12 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The prior art does not disclose “…the cable further comprises two second switches provided at two ends of the cable, respectively, one of the second switches is connected to the power ground of the charger, and the other second switch is connected to the power ground of the terminal.” Dependent claims 6-12 are also allowed. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to AHMED H OMAR whose telephone number is (571)270-7165. The examiner can normally be reached 10:00 am -7:00 PM EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Drew Dunn can be reached at 571-272-2312. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /AHMED H OMAR/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2859
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 12, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 03, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12744408
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR COMBINING MAGNETIC AND NON-MAGNETIC MULTI-COIL WIRELESS CHARGING
3y 9m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12738771
WIRELESS CHARGING CIRCUIT, WIRELESS CHARGING METHOD, DEVICE, AND SYSTEM
4y 1m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12726037
HYBRID-MODE CHARGING CIRCUIT, AND CHARGING METHOD
3y 2m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12726034
STORAGE BATTERY CONTROL DEVICE, POWER STORAGE SYSTEM, AND STORAGE BATTERY CONTROL METHOD
3y 3m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12715316
COIL DEVICE, POWER SUPPLY DEVICE, AND DETECTION DEVICE
4y 7m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
75%
Grant Probability
89%
With Interview (+14.1%)
2y 7m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1098 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month