Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/578,812

METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR DETERMINING HEIGHT OF SOLUTION ACCOMMODATED IN CONTAINER

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Jan 12, 2024
Priority
Jul 12, 2021 — RE 10-2021-0090676 +1 more
Examiner
MERCADO, ALEXANDER A
Art Unit
2855
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Seegene Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
69%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
6m
Est. Remaining
89%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 69% — above average
69%
Career Allowance Rate
417 granted / 601 resolved
+1.4% vs TC avg
Strong +20% interview lift
Without
With
+19.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
36 currently pending
Career history
629
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.9%
-39.1% vs TC avg
§103
82.5%
+42.5% vs TC avg
§102
3.0%
-37.0% vs TC avg
§112
12.4%
-27.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 601 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Acknowledgment is made of applicant’s claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. 119 (a)-(d). The certified copy has been filed in parent Application No. KR 10-2021-0090676, filed on 11 July 2022. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1 – 3 and 9 - 13 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Cochran et al. (US 2007/0107801). Regarding Claim 1, Cochran discloses a method for determining the height of a solution in a container capable of amplifying and detecting a target nucleic acid [Abstract], the method comprising: emitting infrared light to the container using an illuminator (backlight) [0051], wherein the container (bottle) is a colored container (amber) [0051]; sensing the infrared light passing through and refracted by the container [0049, 0050] using a detector including an optical sensor (camera) [0050], wherein the detector is disposed in an orientation such that the detector senses the refracted infrared light [0049]; obtaining an image using the refracted infrared light sensed [0050]; and determining the height of the solution in the container by analyzing the image obtained [0049, 0051]. Note the intended use of the solution does not result in a manipulative difference between the claimed invention and prior art and therefore does not further limit the claim. See MPEP 2111.02.II. Regarding Claim 2, Cochran discloses the use of infrared light that is emitted to the container includes infrared light wavelengths selected from a wavelength range of 730 nm to 980 nm (infrared light inherently lies between 780 nm and 1 mm). Regarding Claim 3, Cochran discloses the analyzing of the obtained image includes identifying a horizontal edge from the obtained image [0049]; and determining the height of the solution on the basis of the identified horizontal edge [0049, 0050]. Regarding Claim 9, Cochran discloses the detector is a monochrome detector (as it can generate a grey scale image) [0051]. Regarding Claim 10, Cochran discloses the container has higher transmittance for the infrared light than visible light [0051]. Regarding Claim 11, Cochran discloses a system for determining the height of a solution (35) in a container (14) capable of for amplifying and detecting a target nucleic acid, the system comprising: an illuminator (backlight) for emitting infrared light to the container [0051]; a detector (28) for obtaining an image by sensing the infrared light passing through and refracted by the container using the illuminator [0048 – 0051], wherein the detector is disposed in an orientation such that the detector senses the refracted infrared light [0049]; and a controller (34) for determining the height of the solution in the container by analyzing the image obtained by the detector [0050]. Note the intended use of the solution does not result in a structural difference between the claimed invention and prior art and therefore does not further limit the claim. See MPEP 2111.02.II. Regarding Claim 12, Cochran discloses the controller identifies a horizontal edge from the obtained image and determines the height of the solution on the basis of the identified horizontal edge [0049, 0050]. Regarding Claim 13, Cochran discloses the detector is a monochrome detector (as it can generate a grey scale image) [0051]. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102/103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 4 - 8 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as anticipated by or, in the alternative, under 35 U.S.C. 103 as obvious over Cochran et al. (US 2007/0107801). Regarding Claims 4 – 8, the claims further limit the solely the solution itself. Cochran fails to expressly disclose these limitations; however, Cochran’s method for determining height of a solution in a container does not rely on the specific content of that solution and is therefore capable of measuring the height of any solution, including one containing the constituents of Claims 4 - 8. Furthermore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the applicant’s invention to modify Cochran to determine the height of a solution containing the constituents of Claims 4 – 8 for the benefit of ensuring an appropriate amount of solution is dispensed in the container, as taught by Cochran. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ALEXANDER MERCADO whose telephone number is (571)270-7094. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Thursday 9am - 4pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Laura Martin can be reached at (571) 272-2160. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. ALEXANDER A. MERCADO Primary Examiner Art Unit 2855 /ALEXANDER A MERCADO/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2855
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 12, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 13, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12637229
METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR LEAK DETECTION AND MITIGATION FOR HYDROGEN FUELED AIRCRAFT
2y 8m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12631662
VIBRATION MONITORS WITH INDICATOR LIGHTS
2y 7m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12621956
ACOUSTICALLY-SENSITIVE FILTER FOULING TESTS
3y 9m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12618808
METHODS FOR DETECTING DEFECTS IN AN ANISOTROPIC ROTOR BLADE USING A PHASED ARRAY ULTRASOUND SYSTEM
3y 2m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12618747
MODULAR MOUNTING APPARATUS FOR DETERMINING VEHICLE VIBRATIONAL ANOMALIES
1y 4m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
69%
Grant Probability
89%
With Interview (+19.5%)
2y 11m (~6m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 601 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month