Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/578,863

WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM AND WIRELESS COMMUNICATION METHOD

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Jan 12, 2024
Examiner
MILLER, SHAWN D
Art Unit
2412
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
NTT, Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
96%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 7m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 96% — above average
96%
Career Allow Rate
217 granted / 226 resolved
+38.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +6% lift
Without
With
+5.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
20 currently pending
Career history
246
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.7%
-37.3% vs TC avg
§103
61.0%
+21.0% vs TC avg
§102
16.5%
-23.5% vs TC avg
§112
10.1%
-29.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 226 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Specification The disclosure is objected to because of the following informalities: the Specification filed 01/12/2024 has text that is not solid black and is difficult to read. Examiner respectfully requests that applicant upload a new Specification with solid black lettering with any subsequent Response. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-8 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Talebi Fard (US 2022/0353799 A1). Talebi Fard is directed to the same field of invention as the instant claims, namely path reselection between a remote UE, one or more relay UEs, and a network device based at least in part on signal strength measured at the remote UE. See, for example, Fig. 23 recreated below. PNG media_image1.png 684 932 media_image1.png Greyscale Regarding Claim 1, Talebi Fard teaches the below limitation(s): a plurality of end wireless devices that include an antenna, a first processor and a first storage medium having first computer program instructions stored thereon (Talebi Fard Fig 20-22 teaches at least two remote UEs (i.e. end wireless devices) that are connected to the network via at least one relay device (i.e. transfer device); Fig 3 wireless device/UE 100 comprises processor 318, memory 326 (i.e. storage medium), and communication interface(s) 320 (i.e. antenna(s))), and transmit and receive signals to and from a wireless terminal which is a communication target (Fig 25-27 RAN is in wireless communication with Relay UE1, Relay U2, and Remote UE (i.e. wireless terminal)); a plurality of transfer devices that transfer signals which are transmitted and received by the wireless terminal which is a communication target and the end wireless device (Fig 14, Fig 23-25 and [0303] teaches one or more first devices (relay UEs, UE-to-network relay UEs, and/or the like), which examiner is interpreting as the claimed "transfer device"); and a transfer management device that includes a second processor and a second storage medium having second computer program instructions stored thereon (Fig 3 base station 105 (i.e. transfer management device) comprising processor 344, memory 346 (i.e. storage medium) and communication interface(s) 342 (i.e. antenna(s))), wherein the second computer program instruction, when executed by the second processor, perform processing of: executing a transfer route control process of controlling paths between the plurality of transfer devices on the basis of the received communication status information, in a case where communication status information indicating a status of communication between the wireless terminal and the end wireless devices is received (Fig 24 wherein UE1 selects a relay UE (i.e. path selection/switching) based on access status info [0303] remote UE (i.e. end wireless device) may determine to switch path from Uu to relay path e.g. due to signal strength (i.e. a status of communication)), wherein the first computer program instruction, when executed by the first processor, perform processing of: executing a switching process of controlling operations of the end wireless devices relating to communication between the end wireless devices and the wireless terminal on the basis of the communication status information (Fig 24 wherein UE1 (i.e. remote UE i.e. wireless terminal) selects a relay UE based on access status info (e.g. communication status); [0303] remote UE (i.e. end wireless device) may determine to switch path from Uu to relay path e.g. due to signal strength (i.e. a status of communication)), and the second processor receives the communication status information before the switching process is completed (Fig 24 UE3 (i.e. relay UE i.e. transfer device) transmits response message comprising access information to UE1 prior to relay selection). Regarding Claim 2, Talebi Fard teaches the limitation(s) of Claim 1. Talebi Fard further teaches the below limitation(s): wherein the communication status information received by the end wireless devices indicates a terminal signal strength which is a strength of a signal received by the wireless terminal and transmitted from the antenna (Talebi Fard [0303] remote UE (i.e. end wireless device) may determine to switch path from Uu to relay path e.g. due to signal strength (i.e. a status of communication)). Regarding Claim 3, Talebi Fard teaches the limitation(s) of Claim 2. Talebi Fard further teaches the below limitation(s): wherein the communication status information received by the transfer management device indicates a terminal signal strength which is a strength of a signal received by the wireless terminal and transmitted from the antenna (Talebi Fard [0274] UE may detect that signal strength is not sufficient to connect to the network and perform a relay selection/path switching procedure in response; [0303] remote UE (i.e. end wireless device) may determine to switch path from Uu to relay path e.g. due to signal strength (i.e. a status of communication)). Regarding Claim 4, Talebi Fard teaches the limitation(s) of Claim 3. Talebi Fard further teaches the below limitation(s): determining whether the switching process is executed on the basis of the terminal signal strength (Talebi Fard [0303] remote UE (i.e. end wireless device) may determine to switch path from Uu to relay path e.g. due to signal strength; see also [0274]). Regarding Claim 5, Talebi Fard teaches the limitation(s) of Claim 2. Talebi Fard further teaches the below limitation(s): wherein the communication status information received by the transfer management device is information obtained on the basis of the terminal signal strength (Talebi Fard [0303] remote UE (i.e. end wireless device) may determine to switch path from Uu to relay path e.g. due to signal strength). Regarding Claim 6, Talebi Fard teaches the limitation(s) of Claim 5. Talebi Fard further teaches the below limitation(s): determining whether the switching process is executed on the basis of the terminal signal strength (Talebi Fard [0303] remote UE (i.e. end wireless device) may determine to switch path from Uu to relay path e.g. due to signal strength), and the information obtained on the basis of the terminal signal strength is a result of the end wireless device determining whether the switching process is executed on the basis of the terminal signal strength ([0274] UE may detect that signal strength is not sufficient to connect to the network and perform a relay selection/path switching procedure in response). Regarding Claim 7, Talebi Fard teaches the limitation(s) of Claim 1. Talebi Fard further teaches the below limitation(s): acquiring the communication status information obtained by the end wireless devices by being transferred by a base station management device that manages the end wireless devices (Talebi Fard Fig 27 wherein Remote UE (wireless device) communicates with Relay UE to obtain access status and perform path reselection to communicate with RAN1 (i.e. base station), wherein examiner is interpreting the Relay UE of Fig 27 as a "base station management device" because it manages connection between the Remote UE and base station RAN1). Regarding Claim 8, Talebi Fard teaches the below limitation(s): a plurality of end wireless devices that include an antenna, a first processor and a first storage medium having first computer program instructions stored thereon (Talebi Fard Fig 20-22 teaches at least two remote UEs (i.e. end wireless devices) that are connected to the network via at least one relay device (i.e. transfer device); Fig 3 wireless device/UE 100 comprises processor 318, memory 326 (i.e. storage medium), and communication interface(s) 320 (i.e. antenna(s))), and transmit and receive signals to and from a wireless terminal which is a communication target (Fig 25-27 RAN is in wireless communication with Relay UE1, Relay U2, and Remote UE (i.e. wireless terminal)); a plurality of transfer devices that transfer signals which are transmitted and received by the wireless terminal which is a communication target and the end wireless device (Fig 14, Fig 23-25 and [0303] teaches one or more first devices (relay UEs, UE-to-network relay UEs, and/or the like), which examiner is interpreting as the claimed "transfer device"); and a transfer management device that includes a second processor and a second storage medium having second computer program instructions stored thereon (Fig 3 base station 105 (i.e. transfer management device) comprising processor 344, memory 346 (i.e. storage medium) and communication interface(s) 342 (i.e. antenna(s))), wherein the second computer program instruction, when executed by the second processor, perform processing of: executing a transfer route control process of controlling paths between the plurality of transfer devices on the basis of the received communication status information (Fig 24 wherein UE1 selects a relay UE (i.e. path selection/switching) based on access status info [0303] remote UE (i.e. end wireless device) may determine to switch path from Uu to relay path e.g. due to signal strength (i.e. a status of communication); [0303] remote UE (i.e. end wireless device) may determine to switch path from Uu to relay path e.g. due to signal strength (i.e. a status of communication)), in a case where communication status information indicating a status of communication between the wireless terminal and the end wireless devices is received, the method comprising: the first processor executing a switching process of controlling operations of the end wireless devices relating to communication between the end wireless devices and the wireless terminal on the basis of the communication status information (Fig 24 wherein UE1 (i.e. remote UE i.e. wireless terminal) selects a relay UE based on access status info (e.g. communication status)); and the second processor receiving the communication status information before the switching process is completed (Fig 24 UE3 (i.e. relay UE i.e. transfer device) transmits response message comprising access information to UE1 prior to relay selection). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SHAWN D MILLER whose telephone number is (571)272-8599. The examiner can normally be reached M-TR 8-5. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Charles C Jiang can be reached at (571) 270-7191. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SHAWN D MILLER/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2412
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 12, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 09, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12604253
ANALYTICS AND PATH SELECTION
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12598154
METHODS, SYSTEMS, AND DEVICES TO ENABLE AN ASSOCIATION BETWEEN A BASE STATION AND AN ACCESS & MOBILITY MANAGEMENT FUNCTION (AMF) IN THE MOBILE NETWORK CORE LOCATED IN THE PUBLIC CLOUD NETWORK THROUGH A NETWORK ADDRESS TRANSLATION (NAT) GATEWAY
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12598544
CORRELATING A USER EQUIPMENT AND AN ACCESS AND MOBILITY MANAGEMENT FUNCTION
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12598508
UTILIZING CELLULAR QUALITY OF SERVICE GUARANTEED CHANNELS FOR OVER-THE-TOP APPLICATIONS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12588005
MANAGEMENT METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR SHARED RADIO UNIT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
96%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+5.8%)
2y 7m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 226 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month