Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/579,186

ASSISTANCE DATA UPDATE PROCEDURES DURING RADIO RESOURCE CONTROL (RRC) IDLE OR INACTIVE STATE POSITIONING

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Jan 12, 2024
Examiner
VAN ROIE, JUSTIN T
Art Unit
2469
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Qualcomm Incorporated
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
83%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 9m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 83% — above average
83%
Career Allow Rate
285 granted / 345 resolved
+24.6% vs TC avg
Strong +41% interview lift
Without
With
+40.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
45 currently pending
Career history
390
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.9%
-38.1% vs TC avg
§103
44.7%
+4.7% vs TC avg
§102
24.5%
-15.5% vs TC avg
§112
17.5%
-22.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 345 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) was submitted on 12 January 2024. The submission is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 31-41 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by 3GPP R2-2108383 (hereinafter referred to as “3GPP’383”). Note: 3GPP’383 was cited by the applicant in the IDS received 12 January 2024. As to claim 31, 3GPP’383 teaches a network entity (page 43; see figure C: LMF), comprising: a memory; at least one transceiver; and at least one processor communicatively coupled to the memory and the at least one transceiver, the at least one processor configured to: receive, via the at least one transceiver, from a base station of a user equipment (UE) operating in a radio resource control (RRC) inactive state or in an RRC idle state, an event report message indicating that the UE has received a request to perform a positioning procedure (page 43; see figure C: LMF receives Event Report from gNB, the gNB received the Event Report from a UE in RRC inactive via an RRC Resume Request); and transmit, via the at least one transceiver, based on a determination that the UE would benefit from updated positioning assistance data for the positioning procedure, the updated positioning assistance data to the base station to enable the base station to send the updated positioning assistance data to the UE (page 45; see figure C: benefits in LMF sending updated assistance data (PRS configurations) to UE via gNB in response to the received UE-initiated trigger in RRC inactive). As to claim 32, 3GPP’383 teaches the network entity of claim 31, wherein the updated positioning assistance data comprises: new positioning assistance data (page 45: new assistance data), a re-prioritization of positioning assistance data previously configured to the UE (page 45: update PRS Index List (i.e., re-prioritization of existing positioning assistance data)), or any combination thereof. As to claim 33, 3GPP’383 teaches the network entity of claim 31, wherein the determination that the UE would benefit from updated positioning assistance data is based on a comparison of positioning assistance data previously configured to the UE to information in the event report message (page 45; see figure C: updating PRS Index List based on received Event Report (UE-initiated trigger in RRC inactive)). As to claim 34, 3GPP’383 teaches the network entity of claim 33, wherein the information in the event report message includes at least a cell identifier associated with the base station (page 45; see figure C: Event Report includes change of cell meaning new cell ID included in Event Report). As to claim 35, 3GPP’383 teaches the network entity of claim 31, wherein: the base station is an anchor base station for the UE (page 43; see figure C: anchor gNB), and the determination that the UE would benefit from updated positioning assistance data is based on a comparison of positioning assistance data previously configured to the UE to positioning assistance data that would be provided to the UE based on the UE being in a coverage area of the anchor base station (page 45; see figure C: updating PRS Index List based on received Event Report (UE-initiated trigger in RRC inactive) including change of cell to anchor gNB). As to claim 36, 3GPP’383 teaches the network entity of claim 31, wherein the network entity is a location server (page 43; see figure C: LMF). As to claim 37, 3GPP’383 teaches a network node (page 43; see figure C: anchor gNB), comprising: a memory; at least one transceiver; and at least one processor communicatively coupled to the memory and the at least one transceiver, the at least one processor configured to: transmit, via the at least one transceiver, to a network entity, a message indicating that a user equipment (UE) operating in a radio resource control (RRC) inactive state or in an RRC idle state and engaged in a positioning procedure has moved from a coverage area of a first transmission-reception point (TRP) to a coverage area of a second TRP (pages 43 and 45; see figure C: gNB transmits Event Report to LMF, the gNB received the Event Report from a UE in RRC inactive via an RRC Resume Request when UE moved coverage area); receive, via the at least one transceiver, from the network entity, updated positioning assistance data for the positioning procedure based on the UE having moved from the coverage area of the first TRP to the coverage area of the second TRP (page 45; see figure C: benefits in LMF sending updated assistance data (PRS configurations) to UE via gNB in response to the received UE-initiated trigger in RRC inactive); and transmit, via the at least one transceiver, a paging message to the UE indicating to the UE that the updated positioning assistance data is available (pages 11 and 45; see figure C: paging message send to UE from gNB providing the updated assistance data). As to claim 38, 3GPP’383 teaches the network node of claim 37, wherein the at least one processor is further configured to: transmit, via the at least one transceiver, the updated positioning assistance data to the UE in a payload of the paging message (pages 11 and 45; see figure C: paging message send to UE from gNB providing the updated assistance data). As to claim 39, 3GPP’383 teaches the network node of claim 37, wherein the at least one processor is further configured to: transmit, via the at least one transceiver, the updated positioning assistance data to the UE in an RRC release message (pages 43 and 45; see figure C: transmit RRC release message to UE including the updated positioning assistance data). As to claim 40, 3GPP’383 teaches the network node of claim 37, wherein the at least one processor is further configured to: receive, via the at least one transceiver, from the network entity, an indication of an area, a group of cells for which the updated positioning assistance data is valid, an expiration timer associated with the updated positioning assistance data, or any combination thereof (pages 43 and 45; see figure C: receive, from LMF, the updated positioning assistance data for an area, cell, and time). As to claim 41, 3GPP’383 teaches the network node of claim 37, wherein: the network node is a base station, and the network entity is a location server (page 43; see figure C: network node is gNB and network entity is LMF). Claim(s) 42-48 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Suzuki et al. EP 2,360,961 (hereinafter referred to as “Suzuki”). Note: Suzuki was cited by the applicant in the IDS received 12 January 2024. As to claim 42, Suzuki teaches a network node (¶¶41, 43, 97, and 102; see figures 3, 5, 15, and 22) comprising: a memory; at least one transceiver; and at least one processor communicatively coupled to the memory and the at least one transceiver, the at least one processor configured to: receive, via the at least one transceiver, from a network entity, a first message indicating one or more validity criteria for each of a plurality of sets of positioning assistance data configurable to a user equipment (UE) (¶¶78 and 83; see figure 15: maintain cache of assistance data received from SLMC having a validity period, and receive, from SLMC, new assistance data for UE and for caching); determine that the UE has moved from a coverage area of a first transmission- reception point (TRP) to a coverage area of a second TRP, wherein the coverage area of the second TRP satisfies the one or more validity criteria for a set of positioning assistance data of the plurality of sets of positioning assistance data (¶¶78 and 82-83; see figure 15: the UE has moved to a new coverage region that satisfies the valid area of the assistance data); and transmit, via the at least one transceiver, a second message to the UE indicating to the UE that the set of positioning assistance data is available (¶83; see figure 15: provide the assistance data to the UE via an assistance data transfer). As to claim 43, Suzuki teaches the network node of claim 42, wherein the second message is a paging message (¶¶71, 73, 76, and 83; see figure 15: provide assistance data to UE via paging to bring the UE in coverage). As to claim 44, Suzuki teaches the network node of claim 43, wherein the at least one processor is further configured to: transmit, via the at least one transceiver, the set of positioning assistance data to the UE in a payload of the paging message (¶¶71, 73, 76, and 83; see figure 15: provide assistance data to UE via paging to bring the UE in coverage). As to claim 45, Suzuki teaches the network node of claim 42, wherein the second message is an RRC release message (¶¶84-85; see figure 15: RRC connection release message). As to claim 46, Suzuki teaches the network node of claim 42, wherein the at least one processor is further configured to: transmit, via the at least one transceiver, the set of positioning assistance data to the UE in an RRC release message (¶¶83-85; see figure 15: provide assistance data to UE via RRC connection release message). As to claim 47, Suzuki teaches the network node of claim 42, wherein the one or more validity criteria comprise: an identifier of an anchor base station, an area, one or more cell identifiers, or any combination thereof (¶¶78 and 82-83; see figure 15: valid area). As to claim 48, Suzuki teaches the network node of claim 42, wherein: the network node is a base station, and the network entity is a location server (¶¶41, 43, 80 and 83; see figures 3, 5, and 15: gNB and SMLC). Claim(s) 54-60 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by 3GPP R2-2105309 (hereinafter referred to as “3GPP’309”). Note: 3GPP’309 was cited by the applicant in the IDS received 12 January 2024. As to claim 54, 3GPP’309 teaches a user equipment (UE) (§2.1, pages 1-2: UE), comprising: a memory; at least one transceiver; and at least one processor communicatively coupled to the memory and the at least one transceiver, the at least one processor configured to: transmit, via the at least one transceiver, while operating in a radio resource control (RRC) inactive state or in an RRC idle state, an RRC resume request to a first network node, the RRC resume request including one or more criteria indicating whether the UE needs updated positioning assistance data for a positioning procedure (§2.1, page 2: UE in INACTIVE transmits RRCResumeRequest message indicating request for new assistance data to a cell); and receive, via the at least one transceiver, from a second network node, the updated positioning assistance data (§2.1, page 2: new cell fetches UE context from source/anchor cell and transmits the new assistance data to the UE). As to claim 55, 3GPP’309 teaches the UE of claim 54, wherein the one or more criteria comprise: a flag indicating that the UE needs new positioning assistance data, one or more cell identifiers that the UE has detected at its current location, an identifier associated with positioning assistance data currently being used by the UE for the positioning procedure, a timestamp associated with the positioning assistance data currently being used by the UE for the positioning procedure, a measurement quality of a reference transmission-reception point (TRP) in the positioning assistance data currently being used by the UE for the positioning procedure, or any combination thereof (§2.1, page 2: criteria include PRS configuration IDs, timer, location, etc.). As to claim 56, 3GPP’309 teaches the UE of claim 55, wherein the at least one processor is further configured to: receive, via the at least one transceiver, the positioning assistance data currently being used by the UE for the positioning procedure while in an RRC connected state (§2.1, page 2: receive previous assistance data based on send identifiers). As to claim 57, 3GPP’309 teaches the UE of claim 54, wherein the RRC resume request includes an event report message indicating that the UE has received a request to perform the positioning procedure (§2.1, page 2: RRCResumeRequest includes event report of UE moving to a new cell). As to claim 58, 3GPP’309 teaches the UE of claim 54, wherein: the first network node is a serving base station of the UE, and the second network node is an anchor base station for the UE (§2.1, page 2: new serving cell and anchor cell). As to claim 59, 3GPP’309 teaches the UE of claim 54, wherein the first network node and the second network node are the same network node (§2.1, page 2: cells can be supported by same node). As to claim 60, 3GPP’309 teaches the UE of claim 54, wherein the at least one processor is further configured to: perform, while in the RRC inactive state or in the RRC idle state, positioning measurement of downlink positioning reference signals (PRS) based on the updated positioning assistance data (§2.1, pages 1-2: UE in INACTRIVE performs DL-PRS using the received positioning assistance data). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure: Dong, US 12,501,389 B2 – PRS Configuration Processing Method and Apparatus, and Communication Device, and Storage Medium Hao, US 2023/0189199 A1 – Positioning Method and Communication Apparatus Dong, US 2023/0148057 A1 – Positioning Method and Apparatus Lee et al., US 12,356,462 B2 – Method for Transmitting/Receiving Signal in Wireless Communication System and Apparatus Supporting Same Jiang et al., US 12,452,822 B2 – Positioning Procedures for User Equipments in Inactive State Lee et al., US 11,606,771 B2 – Method and Apparatus for Transmitting and Receiving Signal in Wireless Communication System Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JUSTIN T VAN ROIE whose telephone number is (571)270-0308. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 8:00am - 4:30pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Ian N Moore can be reached at 571-272-3085. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JUSTIN T VAN ROIE/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2469
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 12, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 04, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12598476
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR OPERATION MODE ON UNLICENSED SPECTRUM
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12549956
OPTIMAL NEW RADIO (NR) RESOURCE ALLOCATION USING BANDWIDTH PART (BWP) ACROSS ASYMMETRIC DSS NETWORKS
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Patent 12543132
COORDINATED ORTHOGONAL FREQUENCY DIVISION MULTIPLE ACCESS (C-OFDMA) IN HIGH DENSITY NETWORKS
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 03, 2026
Patent 12526033
APPARATUS, METHOD, AND COMPUTER PROGRAM FOR DETERMINING A SERVING BEAM USING A MEASUREMENT REPORT POOL
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 13, 2026
Patent 12507265
SIDELINK RESOURCES BASED ON INTERFERENCE CANCELATION CAPABILITY
2y 5m to grant Granted Dec 23, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
83%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+40.9%)
2y 9m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 345 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month