Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/579,297

TRANSCEIVER INTERFACE, TRANSCEIVER SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR OPERATING A TRANSCEIVER INTERFACE

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Jan 12, 2024
Examiner
LEE, JOHN J
Art Unit
2649
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Flexoptix GmbH
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
93%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 5m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 93% — above average
93%
Career Allow Rate
1191 granted / 1284 resolved
+30.8% vs TC avg
Moderate +6% lift
Without
With
+6.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
25 currently pending
Career history
1309
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
7.0%
-33.0% vs TC avg
§103
24.7%
-15.3% vs TC avg
§102
38.5%
-1.5% vs TC avg
§112
7.4%
-32.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1284 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 1. In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. 2. Claims 1 - 17 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Lewis et al. (US 2016/0337038). Regarding claim 1, Lewis teaches that a transceiver interface, in particular mobile transceiver interface, having a configuration unit for configuring a pluggable transceiver (Fig. 1, 2 and page 1, paragraphs 8 – pages 2, paragraphs 14, where teaches mobile transceiver interface for configuring a pluggable transceiver), which comprises a communication interface for communication with an external unit and a transceiver interface for communication with the transceiver (Fig. 1, 2 and page 1, paragraphs 8 – pages 2, paragraphs 37, where teaches mobile transceiver interface for configuring a pluggable transceiver, and tuning a pluggable transceiver device using a tuning apparatus that is inserting the transceiver device into the tuning apparatus, accepting user inputs to the tuning apparatus for tuning the transceiver device, tuning the transceiver device according to the user inputs resulting in a tuned transceiver device without the tuning apparatus communicating with any external devices, locking the transceiver to prevent a device using the tuned transceiver from retuning the transceiver, removing the tuned transceiver device from the apparatus), characterized by a power supply unit (battery pack) for the autonomous power supply of at least the configuration unit (Fig. 1, 2, page 1, paragraphs 8 – pages 2, paragraphs 37, and pages 3, paragraphs 47 - 58, where teaches a pluggable transceiver device comprising a standalone device that is power supply or battery pack). Regarding claim 2, Lewis teaches that the power supply unit provides an autonomous power supply of at least the configuration unit for at least 30 minutes (Fig. 2, 3 and pages 3, paragraphs 47 – pages 4, paragraphs 77). Regarding claim 3, Lewis teaches that the communication interface comprises a wireless communication unit, in particular a WPAN communication unit, for wireless communication with the external unit (Fig. 1, 2 and page 1, paragraphs 8 – pages 2, paragraphs 37). Regarding claim 4, Lewis teaches that the transceiver interface is designed for providing a user data connection to the transceiver (Fig. 1, 2, page 1, paragraphs 8 – pages 2, paragraphs 37, and page 1, paragraphs 2). Regarding claim 5, Lewis teaches that the communication interface comprises at least one wire-bound communication unit, in particular a USB communication unit, for wire-bound communication with the external unit (Fig. 1, 2, page 1, paragraphs 8 – pages 2, paragraphs 37, and pages 3, paragraphs 47 – pages 4, paragraphs 77). Regarding claim 6, Lewis teaches that a transceiver configuration device, which comprises at least the transceiver interface and a configuration element of the configuration unit at least for programming the transceiver (Fig. 1, 2, page 1, paragraphs 8 – pages 2, paragraphs 37, and pages 3, paragraphs 47 – pages 4, paragraphs 77). Regarding claim 7, Lewis teaches that the power supply unit is designed additionally for the autonomous power supply of at least the configuration element (Fig. 1, 2, page 1, paragraphs 8 – pages 2, paragraphs 37, and pages 3, paragraphs 47 – 58). Regarding claim 8, Lewis teaches that an adapter having an adapter unit, which comprises the communication interface and an adapter (power adapter) interface for communication with the transceiver configuration device (Fig. 1, 2, page 1, paragraphs 8 – pages 2, paragraphs 37, and pages 3, paragraphs 47 – 58). Regarding claim 9, Lewis teaches that the adapter interface comprises at least one wire-bound adapter communication unit, in particular a USB adapter communication unit, for wire-bound communication with the transceiver configuration device (Fig. 1, 2, page 1, paragraphs 8 – pages 2, paragraphs 37, and pages 3, paragraphs 47 – pages 4, paragraphs 77). Regarding claim 10, Lewis teaches that the wire-bound adapter communication unit has a plug connector element, which can be connected directly to the transceiver configuration device (Fig. 1, 2, page 1, paragraphs 8 – pages 2, paragraphs 37, and pages 3, paragraphs 47 – pages 4, paragraphs 77). Regarding claim 11, Lewis teaches that the adapter comprises the power supply unit for the autonomous power supply of at least the adapter unit (Fig. 1, 2, page 1, paragraphs 8 – pages 2, paragraphs 37, and pages 3, paragraphs 47 – pages 4, paragraphs 77). Regarding claim 12, Lewis teaches that the power supply unit is designed additionally for the autonomous power supply of at least the external unit (Fig. 1, 2, page 1, paragraphs 8 – pages 2, paragraphs 37, and pages 3, paragraphs 47 – pages 4, paragraphs 77). Regarding claim 13, Lewis teaches that the configuration unit has a display unit which is designed for displaying at least one operating status (pages 5, paragraphs 96 – 99, Fig. 1, 2, page 1, paragraphs 8 – pages 2, paragraphs 37, and pages 3, paragraphs 47 – pages 4, paragraphs 77). Regarding claim 14, Lewis teaches that an operator interface for operating and/or controlling the configuration unit (Fig. 1, 2, page 1, paragraphs 8 – pages 2, paragraphs 37, and pages 3, paragraphs 47 – pages 4, paragraphs 77). Regarding claim 15, Lewis teaches that transceiver interface having the external unit and the transceiver (Fig. 1, 2, page 1, paragraphs 8 – pages 2, paragraphs 37, and pages 3, paragraphs 47 – pages 4, paragraphs 77). Regarding claim 16, Lewis teaches all the limitation as discussed in claim 1. Furthermore, Lewis further teaches that an external unit for controlling the transceiver interface, wherein the transceiver interface comprises a configuration unit for configuring a transceiver with a communication interface for communication with the external unit (Fig. 1, 2, page 1, paragraphs 8 – pages 2, paragraphs 37, and pages 3, paragraphs 47 – pages 4, paragraphs 77), characterized in that at least the configuration unit is autonomously supplied with power (Fig. 1, 2, page 1, paragraphs 8 – pages 2, paragraphs 37, and pages 3, paragraphs 47 – 58). Regarding claim 17, Lewis teaches all the limitation as discussed in claims 1 and 3. Furthermore, Lewis further teaches that the communication interface has a WPAN communication unit for wireless communication with the external unit and the external unit is placed at least partially on the transceiver interface (Fig. 1, 2, page 1, paragraphs 8 – pages 2, paragraphs 37, and pages 3, paragraphs 47 – pages 4, paragraphs 77). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Marler et al. (US 2004/0147231) discloses Method and Apparatus for Enabling Dual Control Head Operation of a Mobile Radio Transceiver. Manapragada (US 2024/0419929) discloses Method and Apparatus for Processing Bandwidth Intensive Data Streams Using Virtual Media Access Control and Physical Layers. Information regarding...Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system... at 866-217-9197 (toll-free)." Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JOHN J LEE whose telephone number is (571)272-7880. The examiner can normally be reached on Mon-Fri (8:00am-5:00pm). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Yuwen Pan can be reached on 571-272-7855. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. J.L January 7, 2026 John J Lee /JOHN J LEE/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2649
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 12, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 07, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12603663
DUAL-BAND RF MIXER CHAIN USING DUAL-BAND MATCHING NETWORK AND SHARED LOCAL OSCILLATOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12593288
UPLINK CARRIER AGGREGATION ARCHITECTURE WITH POWER CONTROL CIRCUIT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12593285
METHODS AND APPARATUS TO ADJUST TRANSMIT POWER HEADROOM FOR A SECONDARY LINK WHILE OPERATING IN A NON-STANDALONE MODE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12587225
Active Power Splitter and Combiner Circuitry
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12581422
UNEQUAL ADDITIONAL MAXIMUM POWER REDUCTION FOR DUAL TRANSMIT MODES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
93%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+6.5%)
2y 5m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1284 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month