Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/579,493

DUPLEX CORD FOR USE AS A REINFORCEMENT IN A BELT BANDAGE OF A PNEUMATIC VEHICLE TYRE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jan 15, 2024
Examiner
FISCHER, JUSTIN R
Art Unit
1749
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Continental Reifen Deutschland GmbH
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
44%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
3y 5m
To Grant
47%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 44% of resolved cases
44%
Career Allow Rate
724 granted / 1626 resolved
-20.5% vs TC avg
Minimal +3% lift
Without
With
+2.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 5m
Avg Prosecution
106 currently pending
Career history
1732
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
69.8%
+29.8% vs TC avg
§102
15.8%
-24.2% vs TC avg
§112
11.6%
-28.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1626 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on September 26, 2025 has been entered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. 4. Claim(s) 11-21 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Fritsch (US 6,601,378, of record) and further in view of Lee (WO 2014/104680, of record) and Oyama (US 2017/0087938, newly cited). Fritsch is directed to a tire construction including a cap ply, wherein said ply is formed with hybrid cords (Column 6, Lines 11+). More particularly, said hybrid cords are “duplex cords” formed by twisting two yarns having different moduli (Column 5, Lines 54+). Fritsch also includes the following language (Column 5, Lines 54+): Generally, any combination of yarns having different properties is possible with the instant invention. Among the disclosed yarn materials are nylon (e.g. nylon-6,6) and polybenzoxazole (Column 5, Lines 30-45). Oyama is further cited to specifically evidence the known use of polyoxazole in cap plies (Paragraph 23). One of ordinary skill in the art would have found it obvious to use such a combination of yarn materials given the general disclosure of Fritsch identified above. Also, Applicant has not provided a conclusive showing of unexpected results for the claimed duplex cord (the lone inventive example does not even include polyoxazole and the lone comparative example includes three yarns). In terms of the claimed mechanical properties (Y value and Z value), it appears that the claimed properties are a function of the material used for respective yarns. The polyamide yarn of Fritsch can be nylon- 6,6 and such is identical to the inventive materials identified by Applicant (Paragraphs 41 and 42). One of ordinary skill in the art would have found it obvious to select such a combination of materials for respective yarns given the general disclosure detailed above. It is emphasized that the claimed mechanical properties appear to necessarily result from selecting nylon 6,6 as a second yarn material and polyoxazole as a first yarn material. Lastly, while Fritsch is broadly directed to a hybrid or composite cord and is silent with respect to a ratio between linear densities, the claimed ratios are consistent with those that are commonly used in hybrid or composite cords, as shown for example by Lee (Paragraph 45). This disclosure is seen to encompass the claimed relationship in which a ratio between a linear density of a first yarn and a second yarn is between 1.05 and 1.3, more preferably between 1.13 and 1.25. It is further noted that the disclosure of a weight ratio by Lee (Paragraph 29) appears to correspond with the claimed ratio between linear densities (Paragraphs 70 and 74). One of ordinary skill in the art would have found it obvious to form a single “duplex cord” of Fritsch with the claimed combination of features absent a conclusive showing of unexpected results. It is emphasized that Table 1 simply includes a single non-inventive example and such does not constitute the closest prior art of record since it includes a triplex cord (and the single inventive cord is not commensurate in scope with the claimed cord assembly). Regarding claims 12 and 21, the weight percentages disclosed in the previous paragraph encompass the claimed quantitative relationship and Applicant has not provided a conclusive showing of unexpected results. With respect to claims 13, 14, and 21, the claimed property appears to correspond with polybenzoxazole. Also, the specific formula listed in claims 14 and 21 is consistent with conventional cord materials used in tires (commonly referred to as Zylon®). Oyama evidences the specific use of the claimed polyoxazole in tire cap plies (Paragraph 23). One of ordinary skill in the art would have found it obvious to form the hybrid cord of Fritsch with the claimed polyoxazole absent a conclusive showing of unexpected results (none of the examples presented by Applicant include the claimed polyoxazole). As to claims 15, 16, and 21, Fritsch teaches the use of yarns having a linear density between about 500 and about 5000 deniers (Column 5, Lines 64+). Regarding claims 17-20, tire plies, such as the cap ply of Fritsch, are well recognized as including a plurality of reinforcing cords and a topping or coating rubber and a final tire article is cured or vulcanized. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed September 4, 2025 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Applicant’s arguments have been addressed in the Advisory Action mailed on September 12, 2025. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JUSTIN R FISCHER whose telephone number is (571)272-1215. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 5:30-2:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Katelyn Smith can be reached at 571-270-5545. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. Justin Fischer /JUSTIN R FISCHER/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1749 October 3, 2025
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 15, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 19, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
May 23, 2025
Response Filed
Jun 03, 2025
Final Rejection — §103
Sep 04, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Sep 26, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Oct 03, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Oct 06, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12600178
TUBELESS TIRE INSERT
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12600842
TYRE AND ELASTOMERIC COMPOUND FOR TYRE, COMPRISING CROSS-LINKED PHENOLIC RESINS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12594792
Tire With Pressure Zero Sidewall Hoop Rings and Method of Manufacture
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12583259
PNEUMATIC TIRE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12576675
TIRE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
44%
Grant Probability
47%
With Interview (+2.6%)
3y 5m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 1626 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month