Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/579,542

METHOD AND DEVICE FOR TRANSMITTING DATA, AND STORAGE MEDIUM

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Jan 16, 2024
Priority
Jul 16, 2021 — nonprovisional of PCTCN2021106725
Examiner
ROBINSON, CHRISTOPHER B
Art Unit
2443
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
BEIJING XIAOMI MOBILE SOFTWARE CO., LTD.
OA Round
2 (Final)
90%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 90% — above average
90%
Career Allowance Rate
434 granted / 485 resolved
+31.5% vs TC avg
Moderate +6% lift
Without
With
+6.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 1m
Avg Prosecution
26 currently pending
Career history
502
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.9%
-38.1% vs TC avg
§103
91.0%
+51.0% vs TC avg
§102
2.1%
-37.9% vs TC avg
§112
0.8%
-39.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 485 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status This action is responsive to communication filed on 04/02/2026. Claim(s) 1, 4-6, 8-9, 12-14 and 17-19 have been amended Claim(s) 2-3, 10-11 & 15-16 have been canceled. Claim(s) 1, 4-6, 8-9, 12-14 and 17-19 are currently pending examination. The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Amendment The Applicant filed amendment(s) to claim(s) on 04/02/2026 to remedy the rejection(s). Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 1, 4-6, 8-9, 12-14 and 17-19 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1, 4-5, 8, 9, 12-13, 17-18 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Park et al. (US 2003/0098992 A1) and further in view of XU JIANXIN (CN 104052680 B). Re Claim 1,8 & 9, Park teaches a method for transmitting data, performed by a data sending side, comprising: determining Internet Protocol (IP) data to be transmitted; (Park; FIG. 1-12; Background, ¶ [0087]-[0095], [0103]-[0107]; Determining whether a low priority packet, higher priority packet requires transmission.) obtaining first IP data and second IP data by classifying the IP data to be transmitted according to importance of the IP data, the importance of the first IP data being greater than the importance of the second IP data; (Park; FIG. 1-12; Background, ¶ [0087]-[0095], [0103]-[0107], [0113]-[0122]; High priority packets (first IP data) and low priority packet (second IP data), in which a higher priority is greater than a lower related priority.) placing the first IP data in a first number of IP datagrams and adding a first identification to headers of the first number of IP datagrams, the first identification being configured to indicate that IP data comprised in an IP datagram is the first IP data; (Park; FIG. 1-12; Background, ¶ [0087]-[0095], [0103]-[0107], [0113]-[0122]; High priority packets, adding identification to headers related to IP datagrams, identifying indicates IP data comprises IP datagram related to IP data.) placing the second IP data in a second number of IP datagrams and adding a second identification to headers of the second number of IP datagrams, the second identification being configured to indicate that IP data comprised in an IP datagram is the second IP data; and (Park; FIG. 1-12; Background, ¶ [0087]-[0095], [0103]-[0107], [0113]-[0122]; The transmission of low priority packets, fragments is transmitted. Low priority packets are identifiable over high priority packets. The packets have headers and identification.) sending the first number of IP datagrams and the second number of IP datagrams based on a sending sequence, (Park; FIG. 1-12; Background, ¶ [0087]-[0095], [0103]-[0107], [0113]-[0122]; The transmission of data packets related to priority (sending sequence).) wherein a sending sequence of the IP datagram with the header comprising the first identification is prior to a sending sequence of the IP datagram with the header comprising the second identification, (Park; FIG. 1-12; Background, ¶ [0087]-[0095], [0103]-[0107], [0113]-[0122]; High priority packets pre-empt low priority packets. High priority packets transmission occur before low priority completion. wherein a number of IP datagrams for transmitting the first IP data is N, and a number of IP datagrams for transmitting the second IP data is M, and (Park; FIG. 1-12; Background, ¶ [0087]-[0095], [0103]-[0107], [0113]-[0122]; The transmission of multiple packets/segments (N, M).) Park does not explicitly suggest wherein the method further comprises: in response to determining that not all of the N IP datagrams for transmitting the first IP data have been successfully sent, abandoning sending the M IP datagrams for transmitting the second IP data. However, in analogous art, XU teaches wherein the method further comprises: in response to determining that not all of the N IP datagrams for transmitting the first IP data have been successfully sent, abandoning sending the M IP datagrams for transmitting the second IP data. (XU; FIG. 1-6; Page(s) 8-14; The cited embodiment(s) detail dependency based prioritized transmission when lower priority data becomes useless if higher priority data transmission fails. In addition, the monitoring of transmission success/failure as it relates to priority data and the abandoning/discarding of lower priority data transmission when higher priority data transmission is unsuccessful/incomplete.) It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention (AIA ) to modify Park in view of XU to abandon sending datagrams for the reasons of creating a IP datagram processing method related to improving data transmission efficiency. (XU Abstract) Re Claim 4, 12 & 17, Park-XU discloses the method for transmitting data according to claim 1, further comprising: determining IP datagrams corresponding to next IP data to be transmitted and sending the IP datagrams corresponding to the next IP data based on a sending sequence indicated by identifications comprised in the headers of the IP datagrams corresponding to the next IP data. (Park; FIG. 1-12; Background, ¶ [0087]-[0095], [0103]-[0107], [0113]-[0122]; The monitoring of packets pending transmission, determining whether high priority packets require transmission and interrupting lower priority packet transmission. The use of IP headers, packet priority and transmission sequencing.) Re Claim 5, 13 & 18, Park-XU discloses the method for transmitting data according to claim 1, wherein the header comprises a character for indicating the first identification or the second identification. (Park; FIG. 1-12; Background, ¶ [0087]-[0095], [0103]-[0107], [0113]-[0122]; IP headers contain various information and priority related data (character, identification).) Claim(s) 6, 14 & 19 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Park et al. (US 2003/0098992 A1), in view of XU JIANXIN (CN 104052680 B) and further in view of Yim (US 2005/0078604 A1). Re Claim 6, 14 & 19, Park-XU discloses the method for transmitting data according to claim 1, yet does not explicitly suggest wherein the header further comprises at least one of a number of the plurality of IP datagrams or a number of IP datagrams transmitting important data. However, in analogous art, Yim teaches wherein the header further comprises at least one of a number of the plurality of IP datagrams or a number of IP datagrams transmitting important data. (Yim; FIG. 1-7; Background, Summary, ¶ [0027]-[0033]; The headers include identifying values related to IP datagrams.) It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention (AIA ) to modify Park-XU in view of Yim to identify the number of datagrams related to IP data for the reasons of identifying values related to IP headers. (Yim Abstract) Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CHRISTOPHER B ROBINSON whose telephone number is (571)270-0702. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 7:00-3:00 EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Nicholas R Taylor can be reached at 571-272-3889. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CHRISTOPHER B ROBINSON/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2443
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 16, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 08, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Apr 02, 2026
Response Filed
May 11, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12641094
INTERACTIVE CYBER-SECURITY USER-INTERFACE FOR CYBERSECURITY COMPONENTS THAT COOPERATES WITH A SET OF LLMS
1y 11m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12634253
METHOD FOR MANAGING THE TRANSMISSION OF A MESSAGE FROM A FIRST DEVICE TO A SECOND DEVICE, AND METHOD FOR MANAGING THE RECEIPT OF SUCH A MESSAGE
3y 5m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12634233
Communication Method and Apparatus, and Communication System
1y 10m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12634367
COMMUNICATION METHODS AND DEVICES IN INTELLIGENT TRANSPORT SYSTEMS
1y 10m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12626011
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR MANAGING AND SECURING SENSITIVE ELECTRONIC FILES
2y 7m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
90%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+6.4%)
2y 1m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 485 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month