Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/580,092

METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR PHYSICAL UPLINK CONTROL CHANNEL (PUCCH) TRANSMISSION

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jan 17, 2024
Examiner
LIU, JUNG-JEN
Art Unit
2473
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Lenovo (Beijing) Limited
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
89%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 7m
To Grant
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 89% — above average
89%
Career Allow Rate
1070 granted / 1198 resolved
+31.3% vs TC avg
Minimal +5% lift
Without
With
+4.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
36 currently pending
Career history
1234
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
6.2%
-33.8% vs TC avg
§103
71.4%
+31.4% vs TC avg
§102
5.6%
-34.4% vs TC avg
§112
2.9%
-37.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1198 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . DETAILED ACTION 1a. Claims 4-5 and 15 are canceled. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 2. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. 2a. Claims 1-3, 6-14 and 16-23 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Guo (US 20230171771 A1) in view of Jang (US 20220353698 A1). 2b. Summary of the Cited Prior Art Guo discloses a method for managing TCI, CoreSet index in uplink transmission. Jang discloses a method for cooperative repeat uplink transmission. 2c. Claim Analysis Regarding Claim 1, Guo discloses: A method, comprising (Fig 5): receiving (Fig 5, Steps 510-520) a plurality of joint or uplink (Fig 5, Steps 560 and 580, PUCCH) common transmission configuration indication (TCI) states (Fig 5, Steps 510-520; see: UE receives configuration of one or more TCI states, in [0059]) associated with a plurality of CORESETPoolIndex values (Fig 5. Step 530; see: gNB indicates a first TCI state for TRP associated with CORESETPoolIndex=0 and the gNB indicates a second TCI state for TRP associated with CORESETPoolIndex=1, in [0059); wherein each TCI state (Fig 5, Steps 510-520) of the plurality of joint or uplink (Fig 5, Steps 560 and 580, PUCCH) common TCI states is separately indicated by a physical downlink control channel (PDCCH) transmitted in a control resource set (CORESET) associated with a CORESETPoolIndex value of the plurality of CORESETPoolIndex values; and (see: when the UE receives a PDCCH, associated with the CORESETPoolIndex with a value of 1, the UE applies a QCL configuration included in the second TCI state, in [0044]; Examiner’s Note: PDCCH is transmitted separately during the configuration steps); for a physical uplink control channel (PUCCH) resource associated with a corresponding CORESETPoolIndex value of the plurality of CORESETPoolIndex values (Fig 5, Steps 560 and 580; see: in each TCI state, the UE can be provided with one or more of the following parameters: PUCCH or the SRS resource, in [0051]), transmitting the PUCCH resource according to a joint or uplink common TCI state indicated by the PDCCH transmitted in the CORESET associated with the corresponding CORESETPoolIndex value (Fig 5, Steps 560 and 580; see when transmitting PUCCH that are associated with CORESETPoolIndex=0, the UE can apply the spatial filter and pathloss RS included in the first TCI state, …., when transmitting PUCCH associated with CORESETPoolIndex=1, the UE can apply the spatial filter and pathloss RS included in the second TCI state, in [0059]; Examiner’s Note: the CORESETPoolIndex values are indicated in PDCCH). Guo does not elaborate about CORESET. However, Jang discloses: wherein each TCI state (see: a tci-StatesPDCCH (hereinafter, TCI state) configuration information … transmitted in the corresponding CORESET, in [0095]) of the plurality of joint or uplink common TCI states is separately indicated by a physical downlink control channel (PDCCH) (Fig 16, PDCCH and PUCCH transmit separately) transmitted in a control resource set (CORESET) (Fig 16; see: the UE may receive configuration information on a search space and a control resource set (CORESET) in which a PDCCH may be transmitted, in [0071]). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to integrate Guo’s method for managing TCI, CoreSet index in uplink transmission with Jang’s method for cooperative repeat uplink transmission with the motivation being to improv data transfer rates (Jang [0057]). Regarding Claim 2, Guo discloses: wherein the corresponding CORESETPoolIndex value (Fig 5. Step 530) is associated with the PUCCH resource (Fig 5, Steps 560 and 580, Examiner’s Note: PUCCH resources are associated with CORESETPoolIndex value, that are also based on TCI states) by a radio resource control (RRC) parameter configured in configuration information of the PUCCH resource (see: the TCI state can be configured in RRC semi-statically, in [0026]; Examiner’s Note, RRC configures TCI state, that is associated with CORESETPoolIndex value and PUCCH) or is associated with the PUCCH resource ((Fig 5, Steps 560 and 580, PUCCH) by the RRC parameter configured in configuration information (see: the TCI state can be configured in RRC semi-statically, in [0026]; Examiner’s Note, RRC configures TCI state, that is associated with CORESETPoolIndex value and PUCCH) of a PUCCH resource group at least comprising the PUCCH resource (see: the system can use a single MAC CE to indicate one spatial relation information for a group of PUCCH resources, in [0028]). Regarding Claim 3, Guo discloses: wherein the PUCCH resource (Fig 5, Steps 560 and 580, PUCCH) and the corresponding CORESETPoolIndex value (see: a PUCCH transmission associated with the CORESETPoolIndex with the value of 1, in [0048]) are associated via a medium access control (MAC) control element (CE) (see: the UE can be indicated with one PUCCH spatial relation information through a MAC CE activation command, in [0028]; Examiner;s Note: CORESETPoolIndex value is associated with PUCCH, and PUCCH is associated with MAC CE), and the MAC CE indicates an identity of a serving cell (see: the MAC CE comprises at least one of following fields: a serving cell ID, a TCI state ID, in [0050]) for which the MAC CE is applied and an identity of a bandwidth part (BWP) for which the MAC CE is applied (Examiner’s Note: MAC CE comprises TCI state ID, and TCI state comprises BWP-Id, see [0053]: PNG media_image1.png 200 400 media_image1.png Greyscale ) Regarding Claim 6, Guo discloses: wherein the MAC CE (see: the UE can be indicated with one PUCCH spatial relation information through a MAC CE activation command, in [0028]) indicates the corresponding CORESETPoolIndex value (see: a PUCCH transmission associated with the CORESETPoolIndex with the value of 1, in [0048]; Examiner’s Note: CORESETPoolIndex value is associated with PUCCH, and PUCCH is associated with MAC CE), and an identity (see: one of following information transmitted by the DCI format X1, …., a PUCCH resource indicator, in [0050]; Examiner’s Note: PUCCH resource indicator implies a PUCCH identifier) of a PUCCH resource group at least comprising the PUCCH resource (see: the system can use a single MAC CE to indicate one spatial relation information for a group of PUCCH resources, in [0028]). Regarding Claim 7, Guo discloses: wherein the PUCCH resource and the corresponding CORESETPoolIndex value (see: a PUCCH transmission associated with the CORESETPoolIndex with the value of 1, in [0048]) are associated via a predefined association between an identity (see: one of following information transmitted by the DCI format X1, …., a PUCCH resource indicator, in [0050]; Examiner’s Note: PUCCH resource indicator implies a PUCCH identifier) of a PUCCH resource group (see: the system can use a single MAC CE to indicate one spatial relation information for a group of PUCCH resources, in [0028]) at least comprising the PUCCH resource and the corresponding CORESETPoolIndex value (see: a PUCCH transmission associated with the CORESETPoolIndex with the value of 1, in [0048]). Regarding Claims 8-14, the transmitter claims disclose similar features as of Claims 1-3, 6, 6, 3 and 7, and are rejected accordingly. Further, He discloses memory, processor and baseband in Fig 6. Regarding Claims 16-22, the receiver claims disclose similar features as of Claims 1-3, 6, 6, 6 and 7, and are rejected accordingly. Further, He discloses memory, processor and baseband in Fig 6. Regarding Claim 23, the processor claim discloses similar features as of Claim 1, and is rejected accordingly. Further, He discloses memory, processor and baseband in Fig 6. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Jung-Jen Liu whose telephone number is 571-270-7643. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday to Friday, 9:00 AM to 5:00 PM. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Kwang B. Yao can be reached on 571-272-3182. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JUNG LIU/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2473
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 17, 2024
Application Filed
Dec 19, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Mar 09, 2026
Interview Requested
Mar 17, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Mar 17, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12604207
APPARATUSES AND METHODS FOR FACILITATING AN INTEGRATED NETWORK AND SYSTEM PLANNING TOOL
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12604332
TECHNIQUES FOR SENDING ASSISTANCE INFORMATION FOR CANCELLING INTERFERENCE IN WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12603695
Reconfigurable Wireless Radio System for Providing Highly Sensitive Nationwide Radar Functionality Using a Limited Number of Frequencies and Adaptable Hardware
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12593241
COMPUTERIZED SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR NON-DISRUPTIVE CAC ON A NETWORK VIA MLO FUNCTIONALITY
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12593375
METHOD OF DETECTING STATUS OF USER OUTSIDE VEHICLE, SYSTEM, STORAGE MEDIUM AND VEHICLE THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
89%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+4.7%)
2y 7m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1198 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month