Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/580,341

INTEGRATED MOLDED BODY AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE HOUSING

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jan 18, 2024
Priority
Jul 29, 2021 — JP 2021-123873 +1 more
Examiner
TATESURE, VINCENT
Art Unit
1786
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Toray Industries, Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
45%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 6m
Est. Remaining
76%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 45% of resolved cases
45%
Career Allowance Rate
193 granted / 429 resolved
-20.0% vs TC avg
Strong +31% interview lift
Without
With
+31.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 11m
Avg Prosecution
21 currently pending
Career history
467
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
95.9%
+55.9% vs TC avg
§102
2.2%
-37.8% vs TC avg
§112
0.9%
-39.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 429 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of claims 10-17 in the reply filed on March 13, 2026 is acknowledged. Claim 18 is withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected electronic device, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on March 13, 2026. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 10-11, 13-14 and 16-17 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over US 2016/0009054 to Okunaka. Regarding Claims 10-11, 13-14 and 16-17 Okunaka teaches an integrally molded body comprising a laminate and a structure the laminate including prepregs that are laminated and made of a continuous carbon fiber (Okunaka, abstract, paragraph [0032], [0051], [0056], fig. 1-3) and the structure being made of a thermoplastic resin and a reinforcing fiber and disposed on a periphery of the laminate (Id., paragraph [0118]). Okunaka teaches that the first prepreg constituting an outermost layer of the laminate being disposed on both sides of the core layer, and has a continuous carbon fiber with a thermal conductivity of between 20 and 600 W/(m*K) which overlaps the claimed range of between 100 and 800 W/(m*K) in the fiber direction (Id., paragraphs [0019] and [0047]). Okunaka teaches that a layer including a different continuous carbon with a thermal conductivity is 3-20 w/(m*K) which provides a ratio of 0.05 to 1, overlapping the claimed ratio of between 0 and 1.0 (Id., paragraph [0019]). Okunaka teaches that the density of the continuous carbon fiber in the first prepreg may be 2.12 g/cm3 which is withing the claimed range of between 2.0 and 2.5 g/cm3 (Id., paragraph [0126]). Okunaka teaches that a thermoplastic resin substrate may be at least partially disposed between the laminate and the structure (Id., paragraph [0080]). Okunaka teaches that the integrally molded body can be used as an electronic device housing (Id., paragraph [0116]). Claim(s) 12 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Okunaka as applied to claims 10-11, 13-14 and 16-17 above, in view of US Pub No. 2009/0117366 to Honma. Regarding Claim 12 Okunaka does not teach that the core is specifically a foamed molded body made of a foamed resin or a porous substrate made of a discontinuous fiber and a thermoplastic resin. However, Honma teaches an integrally molded body comprising at least a skin layer reinforced with carbon fibers and a core layer comprising a foamed resin body (Honma, abstract, paragraphs [0009], [0016], [0118], and [0149]). Honma teaches such a structure is suitable for use in electronic housing and provides lighter weight yet sufficient mechanical properties (Id., paragraphs [0004] and [0138]) It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was filed to form the composite of Okunaka and to utilize the foamed core of Honma, motivated by the desire to form a conventional multi-layer integrally molded structure having decreased weight without sacrificing mechanical properties. Claim(s) 15 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Okunaka as applied to claims 10-11, 13-14 and 16-17 above, in view of CN-202819972 to Tan. Regarding Claim 15 Okunaka teaches that the composite may include a decorative layer on a further outer side of at least one of the outermost layers, but does not specifically teach that the decorative layer is a continuous fiber fabric substrate (Okunaka, paragraphs [0084] and [0085]). However, Tan teaches a layered composite for housing an electronic product comprising a decorative layer comprising a woven fabric which increases the aesthetics and hand of the product (Tan, abstract, paragraphs [0002] - [0007], [0014]-[0015], claim 1). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was filed to form the composite of Okunaka and to apply as the decorative layer, the woven fabric containing decorative layer of Tan, motivated by the desire to further increase the beauty and hand of the finished product. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to VINCENT A TATESURE whose telephone number is (571)272-5198. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 7:30AM-4PM EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jennifer Chriss can be reached at 5712727783. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /VINCENT TATESURE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1786
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 18, 2024
Application Filed
May 20, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12614646
COPPER-COATED STEEL WIRE, STRANDED WIRE, INSULATED ELECTRIC WIRE, AND CABLE
4y 4m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Patent 12612117
VEHICLE BODY STRUCTURAL MEMBER
3y 4m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Patent 12577704
FIBER SHEET, ELECTROSPINNING DEVICE, AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING FIBER SHEET
3y 2m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12566048
HIGH BUOYANCY COMPOSITE MATERIALS
3y 1m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12559653
Articles with an Adhesive Layer
6y 4m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
45%
Grant Probability
76%
With Interview (+31.2%)
3y 11m (~1y 6m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 429 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month