Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/580,424

Processes For Suppressing Emission of Mercury Vapor

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Jan 18, 2024
Examiner
JONES, CHRISTOPHER P
Art Unit
1776
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Albemarle Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
76%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 6m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 76% — above average
76%
Career Allow Rate
1023 granted / 1346 resolved
+11.0% vs TC avg
Strong +25% interview lift
Without
With
+24.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
39 currently pending
Career history
1385
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.7%
-39.3% vs TC avg
§103
41.6%
+1.6% vs TC avg
§102
30.9%
-9.1% vs TC avg
§112
20.4%
-19.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1346 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-11 and 13-16 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Zhou USPA 2021/0146335 A1. Regarding claim 1, Zhou discloses a process for suppressing mercury vapor emission from a substance comprising vaporizable mercury (paragraphs 31, 54 and 55) which process comprises applying a halogen-containing sorbent to said substance (paragraph 55), wherein the halogen comprises one or more halogens selected from chlorine, bromine, and iodine (paragraph 11), and allowing perturbation of the substance to cause mercury to volatilize, thereby suppressing emission of at least a portion of mercury vapor from the substance (paragraphs 36 and 48). Regarding claims 2 and 3, Zhou discloses that the halogen-containing sorbent comprises activated carbon (paragraph 47). Regarding claim 4, Zhou discloses that sorbent comprises a substrate material selected from one or more inorganic materials (paragraph 19). Regarding claim 5, Zhou discloses that the inorganic material is selected from chabazite, silica, kaolinite, and bentonite (paragraph 20). Regarding claim 6, Zhou discloses that the halogen-containing sorbent is a halogen-containing activated carbon sorbent (paragraph 47). Regarding claims 7 and 8, Zhou discloses that the halogen is bromine and/or iodine (paragraph 11). Regarding claim 9, Zhou discloses that the halogen-containing sorbent has a halogen content of about 0.1 to about 30 wt % calculated as bromine and based on the total weight of the halogen-containing sorbent (paragraph 27). Regarding claim 10, Zhou discloses applying the halogen-containing sorbent to the substance comprises: (a) applying the halogen-containing sorbent to a surface of the substance; and/or (b) combining the halogen-containing sorbent with at least a portion of a surface of the substance; and/or (c) adding the halogen-containing sorbent to a reactive barrier; and/or (d) forming a reactive barrier containing the halogen-containing sorbent; and/or (e) introducing the halogen-containing sorbent subsurface to the substance (paragraphs 54 and 55). Regarding claim 11, Zhou discloses that the halogen-containing sorbent is added and/or applied in the form of a slurry or suspension (paragraph 34). Regarding claim 13, Zhou discloses that the halogen-containing sorbent is applied to the substance by spraying a suspension or slurry of the halogen-containing sorbent, by spreading a dry solid comprising the halogen-containing sorbent onto the surface of the substance, or by introducing the halogen-containing sorbent subsurface to the substance (paragraph 49). Regarding claims 14 and 15, Zhou discloses that the substance comprising vaporizable mercury is soil, (paragraphs 49 and 50). Regarding claim 16, Zhou discloses that the perturbation is heating or enclosing at least a portion of the substance (paragraphs 36 and 48: heat; paragraph 55: “contained combination”). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim 12 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Zhou USPA 2021/0146335 A1. Zhou is relied upon as above. Regarding claim 12, Zhou does not disclose that the halogen-containing sorbent is about 5 wt % to about 45 wt % of the slurry or suspension. Nevertheless, absent a proper showing of criticality or unexpected results, the weight percent of the halogen-containing sorbent in the slurry/suspension is considered to be a general condition that would have been routinely optimized by one having ordinary skill in the art in order to provide optimal mercury emission mitigation. MPEP 2144.05. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CHRISTOPHER P JONES whose telephone number is (571)270-7383. The examiner can normally be reached 9AM-6PM EST M-F. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jennifer Dieterle can be reached at (571)270-7872. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CHRISTOPHER P JONES/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1776
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 18, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 26, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12599865
Sealing Interface, Air Dryer Cartridge and Air Treatment Device
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12599869
GAS SEPARATION METHOD AND GAS SEPARATION APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12594519
METHODS FOR REGENERATING A FILTER MEDIUM AND CLEANING FLUE GAS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12589354
ACIDIC GAS SEPARATION DEVICE, AIR PURIFIER, AIR CONDITIONER, AND ACIDIC GAS CONCENTRATION DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12590284
SYSTEM FOR THE CAPTURE AND PURIFICATION OF CO2 AND PURIFICATION UNIT OF SAID SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
76%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+24.8%)
2y 6m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1346 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month