Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/580,810

IL12 RECEPTOR AGONISTS AND METHODS OF USE THEREOF

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Jan 19, 2024
Priority
Jul 19, 2021 — provisional 63/223,534 +5 more
Examiner
ALLEN, MARIANNE P
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
60%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
4m
Est. Remaining
78%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 60% of resolved cases
60%
Career Allowance Rate
599 granted / 996 resolved
At TC average
Strong +18% interview lift
Without
With
+18.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
43 currently pending
Career history
1045
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
32.0%
-8.0% vs TC avg
§102
15.8%
-24.2% vs TC avg
§112
42.9%
+2.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 996 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claims 1-53 have been cancelled. Claims 54-73 have been newly introduced. Specification The disclosure is objected to because of the following informalities: The description of the drawings does not include the subparts of Figure 38A, 38B-1, 38B-2, 38C-1, 38C-2, 38C-3, 38C-4, and 38C-5 and the subparts of Figure 40A, 40A-1, and 40B. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112(a): (a) IN GENERAL.—The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor or joint inventor of carrying out the invention. The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112: The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention. Claims 54-73 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph, as failing to comply with the written description requirement. The claim(s) contains subject matter which was not described in the specification in such a way as to reasonably convey to one skilled in the relevant art that the inventor or a joint inventor, or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the inventor(s), at the time the application was filed, had possession of the claimed invention. Claims 54-73 are not original claims. They were added by amendment on 11/5/2024. Basis was stated to be in the original claims and throughout the specification. No specific basis was pointed to and none is apparent. Independent claims 54 and 73 recite that the IL12 p40 moiety comprises a D2 and D3 domain and “does not comprise a p40 D1 domain.” None of original claims 1-53 contain this limitation. Specification paragraph [0242] discloses that in some embodiments, the p40 moiety comprises p40 D2 and D3 domains, to the exclusion of the p40 D1 domain. See also Figures 3G-3I. SEQ ID NOS: 92 and 93 in Table 8B at page 215 disclose specific constructs that lack the p40 D1 domain. However, there is no general disclosure having the limitation of excluding the p40 D1 domain in the context of the limitations of new claims 54-73. In particular, these portions of the specification do not disclose the structure or identity of any second polypeptide chain with a first polypeptide as recited in instant claims 54 and 73. Independent claims 54 and 73 and dependent claims 55, 63, and 71-72 do not provide an N- to C-terminal order for each of the listed components. Finally, the p40 D2 domain and p40 D3 domain are not required to be in any particular order. The claims constitute new matter. Applicant should point by page and line number for specific basis for each of these claims. Claims 54-73 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph, as failing to comply with the enablement requirement. The claim(s) contains subject matter which was not described in the specification in such a way as to enable one skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and/or use the invention. The claimed products and methods are not enabled. Mutein 12 (SEQ ID NO: 92) and mutein 13 (SEQ ID NO: 93) are the only exemplified embodiments of constructs meeting the limitations of the claims. They had no ability to induce luciferase activity in the CTLL2/Stat3-Luc assay. See at least Figure 20A. No other measures of biological activity appear to have been tested for constructs lacking the p40 D1 domain. No biological activity has been shown for these constructs. It is not known how to use the claimed IL-12 receptor agonists when no agonist activity has been shown. See in particular the methods of claims 72-73. The claims are not enabled. The art of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Fu et al. (WO 2019/209965, of record), Lu et al. (WO 2021/062406, of record), Hedvat et al. (WO 2021/067863, of record), and Garcia et al. (WO 2021/212083, of record) do not disclose or suggest excluding the D1 domain of IL-12 p40. Chang et al. (U.S. Patent No. 12,522,638) issued from U.S. Application 17/813,122 and corresponds to U.S. Patent Application Publication 2023/0051304. These documents are not prior art against the instant claims as they have the same inventors and applicant as the instant application and have the same effective filing date. They claim priority to the same provisional applications. The claims of the ‘638 patent differ from the instant claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MARIANNE P ALLEN whose telephone number is (571)272-0712. The examiner can normally be reached 7:00-3:30 EST Monday-Friday. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Joanne Hama can be reached at 571-272-2911. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Marianne P Allen/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1647 mpa
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 19, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 09, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12679884
RED LIGHT-CONTROLLED PROTEIN DIMERIZATION SYSTEMS
3y 8m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12662525
TECHNIQUES FOR PREDICTING, DETECTING AND REDUCING ASPECIFIC PROTEIN INTERFERENCE IN ASSAYS INVOLVING IMMUNOGLOBULIN SINGLE VARIABLE DOMAINS
4y 10m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12653863
FGF21 COMPOSITIONS FOR TREATMENT OR PREVENTION OF NEOVASCULARIZATION OF THE EYE AND METHODS THEREFOR
4y 1m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12630609
TECHNIQUES FOR PREDICTING, DETECTING AND REDUCING ASPECIFIC PROTEIN INTERFERENCE IN ASSAYS INVOLVING IMMUNOGLOBULIN SINGLE VARIABLE DOMAINS
12y 2m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12617848
METHODS OF TREATING OCULAR PATHOLOGIES USING BIFUNCTIONAL MOLECULES THAT TARGET GROWTH FACTORS
4y 5m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
60%
Grant Probability
78%
With Interview (+18.2%)
2y 10m (~4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 996 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month