Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026
Application No. 18/580,950

VERTICAL INDEXING OF GROW TOWER SEGMENTS

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Jan 19, 2024
Priority
Jul 21, 2021 — provisional 63/224,083 +3 more
Examiner
MACCRATE, NICOLE PAIGE
Art Unit
3642
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Mjnn LLC
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
57%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
79%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 57% of resolved cases
57%
Career Allowance Rate
109 granted / 192 resolved
+4.8% vs TC avg
Strong +22% interview lift
Without
With
+22.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
30 currently pending
Career history
221
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
46.3%
+6.3% vs TC avg
§102
22.9%
-17.1% vs TC avg
§112
28.1%
-11.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 192 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Drawings The drawings received on 7/22/2026 are accepted. Specification The substitute specification filed 7/22/2026 has been entered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-2, 19-20, 22, 28-29, 44-45, & 70-74 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 1 recites the limitation "the lowest slot of the set of slots" in the second to last line of the claim. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claims 2, 19-20, 22, 70, & 73 fails to remedy such deficiency. Claim 1 recites the limitation "the bottom of a highest slot of the set of slots" in last two lines of the claim. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claims 2, 19-20, 22, 70, & 73 fails to remedy such deficiency. Claim 28 recites the limitation "the lowest slot of the set of slots" in the second to last line of the claim. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claims 29, 44-45, 72 & 74 fails to remedy such deficiency. Claim 28 recites the limitation "the bottom of a highest slot of the set of slots" in last two lines of the claim. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claims 29, 44-45, 72 & 74 fails to remedy such deficiency. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2, 19-20, 22, 29, 44-45, & 70-74 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: With regard to claim 1 and similarly claim 28, the prior art of record fails to show or fairly render obvious the combined limitations of the invention specifically, the integral projection of each segment is engaged with a selected slot of the plurality of slots of the spine. As such, the examiner has come to the determination that either alone or in combination with the prior art of record it would not have been obvious to meet the overall claim without impermissible hindsight. Claims 2, 19-20, 22, 29, 44-45, & 70-74 would be allowed for containing such subject matter. This statement is not intended to necessarily state all the reasons for allowance or all the details of why the claims are allowed and has not been written to specifically or impliedly state that all the reasons for allowance are set forth. See MPEP 1302.14. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to NICOLE P MACCRATE whose telephone number is (571)272-5215. The examiner can normally be reached M-Th: 9am-5pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Joshua J Michener can be reached at 571-272-1467. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /NICOLE PAIGE MACCRATE/Examiner, Art Unit 3642 /JOSHUA J MICHENER/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3642
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 2 earlier events
Sep 02, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Sep 02, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Oct 20, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Feb 20, 2026
Response Filed
Apr 23, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §112
Jul 22, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Jul 24, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Sep 11, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12740549
PLANT FOR AQUACULTURE AND OUTLET FOR AQUACULTURE TANKS AND OTHER USES THEREOF
1y 8m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12714074
BEEHIVE FRAME COVER
2y 7m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12714084
Insect Bait Stake
2y 2m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12702125
A FUMIGANT VAPORISING AND DELIVERY APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12695971
BIRDHOUSE INCORPORATING A CAMERA FOR REMOTE VIEWING
2y 1m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
57%
Grant Probability
79%
With Interview (+22.4%)
2y 4m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 192 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month