Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 04, 2026
Application No. 18/581,121

RFID SYSTEM FOR DETECTING PRODUCTS IN A PRODUCT PROCESSING SYSTEM

Non-Final OA §101§DP
Filed
Feb 19, 2024
Priority
May 20, 2008 — divisional of 61/054,757 +8 more
Examiner
PHAN, THO GIA
Art Unit
2845
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Deka Products Limited Partnership
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
92%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 92% — above average
92%
Career Allowance Rate
933 granted / 1020 resolved
+23.5% vs TC avg
Minimal +5% lift
Without
With
+4.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 1m
Avg Prosecution
25 currently pending
Career history
1045
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.0%
-39.0% vs TC avg
§103
38.9%
-1.1% vs TC avg
§102
38.0%
-2.0% vs TC avg
§112
9.7%
-30.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1020 resolved cases

Office Action

§101 §DP
DETAILED ACTION Remark An rce filed on 8/26/25 had been entered in the application. Double Patenting A rejection based on double patenting of the “same invention” type finds its support in the language of 35 U.S.C. 101 which states that “whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process... may obtain a patent therefor...” (Emphasis added). Thus, the term “same invention,” in this context, means an invention drawn to identical subject matter. See Miller v. Eagle Mfg. Co., 151 U.S. 186 (1894); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Ockert, 245 F.2d 467, 114 USPQ 330 (CCPA 1957). A statutory type (35 U.S.C. 101) double patenting rejection can be overcome by canceling or amending the claims that are directed to the same invention so they are no longer coextensive in scope. The filing of a terminal disclaimer cannot overcome a double patenting rejection based upon 35 U.S.C. 101. Claims 1-11 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 as claiming the same invention as that of claims 1-16 of prior U.S. Patent No. 9,203,143. This is a statutory double patenting rejection. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to THO GIA PHAN whose telephone number is (571)272-1826. The examiner can normally be reached on M-F (8-430). If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Dimary Lopez can be reached on (571) 270-7893. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). /THO G PHAN/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2845
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 19, 2024
Application Filed
Dec 12, 2024
Non-Final Rejection — §101, §DP
Mar 14, 2025
Response Filed
May 28, 2025
Final Rejection — §101, §DP
Aug 26, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Aug 28, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Sep 14, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §101, §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12611961
ELECTRIFIED VEHICLE
1y 6m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Patent 12609460
Array Fed RF Lens Antenna
2y 2m to grant Granted Apr 21, 2026
Patent 12603438
QUASI-HELICAL ANTENNAS AND ASSOCIATED MANUFACTURING METHODS
3y 0m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12603437
ANTENNA
2y 4m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12597703
VEHICULAR ANTENNA DEVICE
2y 9m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
92%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+4.7%)
2y 1m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 1020 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month