Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/581,309

LEAD INSERTION VERIFICATION

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Feb 19, 2024
Priority
Feb 22, 2023 — provisional 63/447,451
Examiner
KRATT, JUSTIN M
Art Unit
2831
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Cardinal Health Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
87%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
92%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 87% — above average
87%
Career Allowance Rate
579 granted / 666 resolved
+18.9% vs TC avg
Moderate +5% lift
Without
With
+5.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 0m
Avg Prosecution
31 currently pending
Career history
704
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
73.2%
+33.2% vs TC avg
§102
7.6%
-32.4% vs TC avg
§112
19.0%
-21.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 666 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Specification The title of the invention is not descriptive. A new title is required that is clearly indicative of the invention to which the claims are directed. The following title is suggested: --ELECTRICAL CONNECTOR WITH A MOVEABLE VISUAL INDICATOR TO VERIFY PROPER ELECTRICAL CONTACT--. Claim Objections Claims 2 and 4 objected to because of the following informalities: In claim 2 line 2, the phrase “and inner diameter” should read --and the inner diameter--. In claim 2 line 3, the phrase “is to slide” should read --is configured to slide--. In claim 4 line 1, the phrase “wherein lead” should read --wherein the lead--. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1, 3-5, 9 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Sommer et al. (2003/0143895). With regard to claim 1, Sommer teaches, as shown in figures 1A-22 and taught in the Abstract and paragraph 97: “A connector apparatus 1510 and 5100 of a medical device (taught in the Abstract) to provide electrical contact to at least one conductive lead 1510, the apparatus comprising: at least one lead receptacle 5150 including an opening (where 1510 is received in 5100 in figure 20) to receive the at least one conductive lead 1510, wherein the at least one lead receptacle 5150 includes: at least a first electrode 5114 to contact the at least one conductive lead 1510 when the conductive lead 1510 is inserted into the lead receptacle 5150; and a moveable visual indicator 1526 to be moved to become visible through the connector apparatus when the at least one conductive lead 1510 is inserted in the lead receptacle 5150 and contacts the at least one electrode 5114”. With regard to claim 3, Sommer teaches: “The apparatus of claim 1”, as shown above. Sommer also teaches, as shown in figures 1A-22 and taught in the Abstract and paragraph 97: “wherein the visual indicator 1526 is to move from a non-visible position in the lead receptacle to a visible position (when 1526 is protruding from 5100, as described in paragraph 97) in the lead receptacle 5150 when the at least one conductive lead 1510 is inserted in the lead receptacle 5150 to an end of the lead receptacle 5150”. With regard to claim 4, Sommer teaches: “The apparatus of claim 1”, as shown above. Sommer also teaches as shown in figures 1A-22 and taught in the Abstract and paragraphs 76, 86, and 97: “wherein lead receptacle 5150 includes a cylindrical opening (where 1510 is inserted into 5150 in figure 18) that includes a non-conductive material (paragraph 86 teaches the lead receptacle formed of plastic), and the visual indicator 1526 includes a cylindrical shape and includes silicone (paragraph 76 teaches the indicator made from material including silicone)”. With regard to claim 5, Sommer teaches: “The apparatus of claim 1”, as shown above. Sommer also teaches as shown in figures 1A-22 and taught in the Abstract and paragraphs 76, 86, and 97: “wherein the visual indicator 1526 includes a color (color of 1526 in figure 20) visible through an end of the lead receptacle 5150 when the at least one conductive lead 1510 contacts the at least one electrode 5114”. With regard to claim 7, Sommer teaches: “The apparatus of claim 1”, as shown above. Sommer also teaches as shown in figures 1A-22 and taught in the Abstract and paragraphs 76, 86, and 97: “wherein the connector apparatus includes a header connector 5100 for the medical device, and the header connector 5100 includes a mold layer 5106 covering the lead receptacle 5150 and the visual indicator 1526 is moveable to be visible through the mold layer 5106 when the at least one conductive lead 1510 is inserted in the lead receptacle 5150 and contacts the at least one electrode 5114”. With regard to claim 8, Sommer teaches: “The apparatus of claim 1”, as shown above. Sommer also teaches as shown in figures 1A-22 and taught in the Abstract and paragraphs 76, 86, and 97: “wherein the at least one lead receptacle 5150 includes a ridge (where 5150 covers 1526 before 1526 is exposed as shown in figure 20) to hold the moveable visual indicator 1526 in a non-visible position in the lead receptacle 5150 until the at least one conductive lead 1510 is inserted in the lead receptacle 5150”. With regard to claim 9, Sommer teaches, as shown in figures 1A-22 and taught in the Abstract and paragraph 97: “A method of making a connector assembly 1510 and 5100 for a medical device (taught in the Abstract), the method including: forming a lead receptacle 5150 to receive a conductive lead 1510, including: forming a cylindrical tube having a bore (where 1510 is received in 5100 in figure 20) to receive an end of the conductive lead 1510; forming at least one electrode 5114 in the bore to contact the conductive lead 1510 when the conductive lead 1510 is inserted into the bore; and arranging a moveable visual indicator 1526 within the bore in a first position with the visual indicator not visible external to the lead receptacle 5150, wherein the visual indicator 1526 is moveable to a second position in the bore with the visual indicator 1526 visible external to the lead receptacle 5150 when the end of the conductive lead 1510 is inserted in the bore and contacts the at least one electrode 5114”. With regard to claim 12, Sommer teaches: “The method of claim 9”, as shown above. Sommer also teaches as shown in figures 1A-22 and taught in the Abstract and paragraphs 76, 86, and 97: “including forming a ridge (where 5150 covers 1526 before 1526 is exposed as shown in figure 20) in the bore to hold the moveable visual indicator 1526 in the first position in the bore”. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 10, 14, 16-18, and 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Sommer et al. (2003/0143895). With regard to claim 10, Sommer teaches: “The method of claim 9”, as shown above. Sommer also teaches, as shown in figures 1A-22 and taught in the Abstract and paragraphs 86 and 97: “each lead receptacle 5150 including at least one electrode 5114 and a visual indicator 1526; attaching conductive wires 1510 to the electrodes 5114… and forming a mold layer 5106 covering the lead receptacles 5150 and conductive wires 1510, and wherein the visual indicators 15262 are visible within the mold layer 5106 when the visual indicators 1526 are in the second position in the bore”. Sommer does not specifically teach the assembly having multiple receptacles. However, it would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to duplicate the parts of Sommer to have multiple receptacles in order to connect multiple types of conductors to the header connector assembly. Also, it has been held that mere duplication of the essential working parts of a device involves only routine skill in the art. St. Regis Paper Co. v. Bemis Co., 193 USPQ 8. With regard to claim 14, Sommer teaches, as shown in figures 1A-22 and taught in the Abstract and paragraphs 86 and 97: “A header connector assembly 1510 and 5100 of a medical device (taught in the Abstract), the assembly comprising… lead” receptacle 5150 “each lead receptacle 5150 including: a cylindrical tube having a bore (where 1510 is received in 5100 in figure 20) to receive an end of a conductive lead 1510; at least one electrode 5114 to contact the conductive lead 1510 when the conductive lead 1510 is inserted into the bore; and a moveable visual indicator 1526; and a header block 5100 including a mold layer 5106, wherein the… lead” receptacle 5150 “arranged within the mold layer 5106 and the header block 5100 further includes… conductive” wire 1510 “to contact the electrodes 5114 of the lead” receptacle 5150 “and wherein the moveable visual indicator 1526 of a lead receptacle 5150 is configured to move from a non-visible position in the header block 5100 to a visible position (when 1526 is protruding from 5100, as described in paragraph 97) in the header block 5100 when the conductive lead 1510 is inserted in the lead receptacle 5150 and contacts the at least one electrode 5114”. Sommer does not specifically teach the assembly having multiple receptacles. However, it would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to duplicate the parts of Sommer to have multiple receptacles in order to connect multiple types of conductors to the header connector assembly. Also, it has been held that mere duplication of the essential working parts of a device involves only routine skill in the art. St. Regis Paper Co. v. Bemis Co., 193 USPQ 8. With regard to claim 16, Sommer teaches: “The assembly of claim 14”, as shown above. Sommer also teaches, as shown in figures 1A-22 and taught in the Abstract and paragraph 97: “wherein the moveable visual indicator 1526 is to move from a non-visible position in the header connector 5100 to a visible position (when 1526 is protruding from 5100, as described in paragraph 97) in the header connector 5100 when the conductive lead 1510 is inserted in the lead receptacle 5150 to an end of the lead receptacle 5150”. With regard to claim 17, Sommer teaches: “The assembly of claim 14”, as shown above. Sommer also teaches as shown in figures 1A-22 and taught in the Abstract and paragraphs 76, 86, and 97 and as modified above: “wherein cylindrical tubes of the lead receptacles 5150 that include a non-conductive material (paragraph 86 teaches the lead receptacle formed of plastic), and the visual indicator 1526 of each lead receptacle 5150 includes a cylindrical shape and includes silicone (paragraph 76 teaches the indicator made from material including silicone)”. With regard to claim 18, Sommer teaches: “The assembly of claim 14”, as shown above. Sommer also teaches as shown in figures 1A-22 and taught in the Abstract and paragraphs 76, 86, and 97 and as modified above: “wherein the visual indicator 1526 of each lead receptacle 5150 is visible through an end of the lead receptacle 5150 when the conductive lead 1510 is inserted to contact the at least one electrode 5114 of the lead receptacle 5150”. With regard to claim 20, Sommer teaches: “The assembly of claim 14”, as shown above. Sommer also teaches as shown in figures 1A-22 and taught in the Abstract and paragraphs 76, 86, and 97 and as modified above: “wherein each lead receptacle 5150 includes a ridge (where 5150 covers 1526 before 1526 is exposed as shown in figure 20) within the bore to hold the moveable visual indicator 1526 in the non-visible position in the header block 5100 until the conductive lead 1510 is inserted in the lead receptacle 1510”. Claims 6 and 19 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Sommer et al. (2003/0143895) in view of Carson (5,626,626). With regard to claim 6, Sommer teaches: “The apparatus of claim 1”, as shown above. Sommer does not teach: “wherein the lead receptacle includes a clear end cap, and the visual indicator includes a color visible through the clear end cap when the at least one conductive lead is inserted in the lead receptacle and contacts the at least one electrode”. In the same field of endeavor before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, Carson teaches, as shown in figures 2-4: “wherein the lead receptacle 70 includes a clear end cap 60, and the visual indicator includes a color (color of 48) visible through the clear end cap 60 when the at least one conductive lead 48 is inserted in the lead receptacle 70 and contacts the at least one electrode 36”. It would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine the features of Carson with the invention of Sommer in order to determine the lead is properly installed (Carson, column 3 lines 48-51). With regard to claim 19, Sommer teaches: “The assembly of claim 14”, as shown above. Sommer does not teach: “wherein each lead receptacle includes a clear end cap, and the visual indicator of each lead receptacle is to become visible through the clear end cap when the conductive lead is inserted in the lead receptacle and contacts the at least one electrode”. In the same field of endeavor before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, Carson teaches, as shown in figures 2-4: “wherein each lead receptacle 70 includes a clear end cap 60, and the visual indicator 48 of each lead receptacle 70 is to become visible through the clear end cap 60 when the conductive lead 48 is inserted in the lead receptacle 70 and contacts the at least one electrode 36”. It would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine the features of Carson with the invention of Sommer in order to determine the lead is properly installed (Carson, column 3 lines 48-51). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 11, 13, and 15 objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Claim 2 would be allowable if rewritten to overcome the objection(s) set forth in this Office action and to include all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JUSTIN M KRATT whose telephone number is (571)270-0277. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9am-6pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Abdullah A Riyami can be reached at (571)270-3119. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JUSTIN M KRATT/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2831
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 19, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 29, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12683328
ELECTRICAL CONNECTOR WITH FIXED HOUSING, FLOATING HOUSING, ELASTIC TERMINAL MOUNTED THEREIN AND ELECTRICAL CONNECTOR ASSEMBLY USING THE SAME
2y 10m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12676442
ELECTROMAGNETIC SHIELDING FOR A PRINTED CIRCUIT BOARD CONNECTOR
2y 11m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12671200
MIDBOARD CABLE TERMINATION ASSEMBLY
4y 6m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12671195
ELECTRICAL CARD CONNECTOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12660851
CONTAINER FOR AEROSOLISABLE MATERIAL AND DEVICE USING THE SAME
4y 10m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
87%
Grant Probability
92%
With Interview (+5.4%)
2y 0m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 666 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month