Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/581,342

TRIGGER SWITCH

Final Rejection §102
Filed
Feb 19, 2024
Priority
Mar 16, 2023 — JP 2023-041487
Examiner
CAROC, LHEIREN MAE ANGLO
Art Unit
2831
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Omron Corporation
OA Round
2 (Final)
78%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
92%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 78% — above average
78%
Career Allowance Rate
782 granted / 1004 resolved
+9.9% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+13.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
38 currently pending
Career history
1033
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
64.3%
+24.3% vs TC avg
§102
26.2%
-13.8% vs TC avg
§112
7.5%
-32.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1004 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1, 4 and 5 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Peot [US 4,296,290]. In regard to claim 1, Peot discloses [in Figs. 1-3] a trigger switch, comprising: a trigger [12] that moves in a pulling direction in response to pressure of a pulling operation and moves in an opposite direction to the pulling direction in response to being released from the pressure; a movable engagement member [32] that moves in conjunction with movement of the trigger [12], wherein the movable engagement member [32] comprises ratchet teeth [pointed to at 32, Fig. 3] arranged along a movement direction; and a restraint engagement member [26, 28] that prevents movement of the movable engagement member [32] in the opposite direction to the pulling direction by engaging with the movable engagement member [32], wherein the restraint engagement member [26, 28] comprises a ratchet pawl [34], comprise an urging member [28] that urges that ratchet pawl toward the ratchet teeth of the moveable engagement member [32], allows movement of the movable engagement member [32] in the pulling direction, and engages with the movable engagement member [32] to prevent movement in the opposite direction from a position to which the movable engagement member [32] is moved in the pulling direction, wherein the ratchet teeth of the movable engagement member [32] and the ratchet pawl [34] of the restraint engagement member [26, 28] engage so that the movable engagement member [32] and the restraint engagement member [26, 28] engage. In regard to claim 4, Peot discloses [in Figs. 1-3] the trigger switch according to claim 1, further comprising a release operation part [14] that receives an operation to release the movable engagement member [32] from engagement with the restraint engagement member [26, 28]. In regard to claim 5, Peot discloses [in Figs. 1-3] the trigger switch according to claim 1, further comprising a release operation part [14] that receives an operation to release the movable engagement member [32] from engagement with the restraint engagement member [26, 28]. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 04/21/2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. In regard to amended claim 1, Applicant argues that “the Peot reference fails to disclose or suggest at least the features "wherein the restraint engagement member comprises a ratchet pawl, comprises an urging member that urges the ratchet pawl toward the ratchet teeth of the movable engagement member" as recited in the currently presented claim 1” because “In Peot, the lock button 28 (alleged as "urging member" in claims) is used to activate the lock-on mechanism only through a manual user operation, namely, by pushing the lock button 28 toward the switch body 20.” However, the Examiner notes that amended claim 1 does not specify how the urging member urges engagement. User operation of urging member [28] urges the ratchet pawl toward the ratchet teeth as recited in claim 1. Applicant further argues that “If Peot's invention was modified to include an urging member that constantly biases/urges the lock pin 26 toward engagement, such modification would eliminate the need for the lock button 28 (the requirement for manual operation for safety).” However, the Examiner notes that amended claim 1 does not require that that the urging member constantly biases/urges the ratchet pawl as argued by the Applicant. Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to LHEIREN MAE A CAROC whose telephone number is (571)272-2730. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday, 9:00am-5:00pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Renee Luebke can be reached at 571-272-2009. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /LHEIREN MAE A CAROC/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2831
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 19, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 22, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
Apr 21, 2026
Response Filed
Jun 30, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12676269
OPERATING DEVICE OF HUMAN-POWERED VEHICLE
2y 8m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12665141
ACTUATION UNIT FOR A SWITCHING APPARATUS
2y 4m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12658386
BREAK MECHANISM FOR SWITCHING APPARATUS AND SWITCHING APPARATUS
2y 6m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12651715
ROTATION DETECTION DEVICE AND STYLUS PEN
2y 3m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Patent 12646669
Module for Generating Opening Signals
2y 11m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
78%
Grant Probability
92%
With Interview (+13.6%)
2y 5m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1004 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month