Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/581,841

COMBINATION AND METHOD FOR OPERATING A COMBINATION

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Feb 20, 2024
Examiner
MYERS, GLENN F
Art Unit
3652
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Deere & Company
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
77%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 11m
To Grant
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 77% — above average
77%
Career Allow Rate
764 granted / 992 resolved
+25.0% vs TC avg
Strong +20% interview lift
Without
With
+19.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
38 currently pending
Career history
1030
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
45.8%
+5.8% vs TC avg
§102
28.1%
-11.9% vs TC avg
§112
22.8%
-17.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 992 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-12 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Wolff et al. 2021/0188240, Provided by applicant. In Re Claim 1, Wolff et al. teach a baler combination comprising: a towing vehicle (10, Fig. 2) having a drive system (10, 22); a baler (12) pulled by the towing vehicle by a drawbar (14); an actuator (54) coupled to the drawbar and one of the towing vehicle and the baler; (Fig. 2) wherein the actuator is operable to adjust an angle between the drawbar and the baler; (Fig. 2) a controller (52) connected to the drive system and the baler (Paragraph 35), wherein the controller is operable to: control at least one of the drive system and the actuator to move the towing vehicle and the baler from a first position (non-adjusted orientation, Paragraph 10) to an unloading position (Paragraph 10 orientation for depositing material); (Paragraph 36) control the baler to unload a bale at the unloading position; (Paragraph 36) and control at least one of the drive system and the actuator to move the towing vehicle and the baler from the unloading position to the first position. (Paragraph 36 and 37) In Re Claim 2, Wolff et al. teach wherein the controller is operable to determine one of an unloading angle between the baler and the drawbar or the unloading position. (Paragraph 35-37) In Re Claim 3, Wolff et al. teach the controller operable to determine the unloading position as a function of one of an inclination at the unloading position or an inclination of the towing vehicle and the baler. (Paragraph 31) In Re Claim 4, Wolff et al. teach an inclination sensor operable to detect an inclination of one of the towing vehicle and the baler in the form of an inclination signal, wherein the controller is connected to the inclination sensor, and wherein the controller is operable to receive the inclination signal from the inclination sensor and determine one of an unloading angle between the drawbar and the baler, or the unloading position, based on the inclination signal. (Paragraph 31) In Re Claim 5, Wolff et al. teach a GPS installation for determining a position of one of the towing vehicle and the baler in the form of a position signal, wherein the controller is connected to the GPS installation for receiving the position signal from the GPS installation, and wherein the controller is operable to determine one of an unloading angle between the drawbar and the baler or the unloading position, as a function of the position signal. (Paragraph 26) In Re Claim 6, Wolff et al. teach wherein the towing vehicle includes a steering installation (20, 64), and wherein the controller is connected to the steering installation and operable to control the steering installation to steer the towing vehicle to move the baler from the first position to the unloading position. (Paragraph 24-26) In Re Claim 7, Wolff et al. teach an input and output device (68) connected to the controller, and wherein the input and output device is operable to generate an unloading signal defining one of the unloading position or an unloading angle between the drawbar and the baler, and communicate the unloading signal to the controller. (Paragraph 38) In Re Claim 8, Wolff et al. teach wherein the controller is operable to generate an unloading signal defining one of the unloading position or an unloading angle between the drawbar and the baler, wherein the unloading signal is generated prior to completion of a pressing phase of the baler, at completion of the pressing phase of the baler, prior to completion of a wrapping phase of the baler, or at completion of the wrapping phase of the baler. (Paragraph 14 and 15) In Re Claim 9, Wolff et al. teach wherein the controller is operable to actuate an ejection unit of the baler to eject the bale when one of an unloading angle between the drawbar and the baler or the unloading position is achieved. (Paragraph 37) In Re Claim 10, Wolff et al. teach wherein the controller is operable to generate a confirmation signal (Signal, Paragraph 37) when the towing vehicle and baler are moved into one of an unloading angle between the drawbar and the baler or the unloading position. (Paragraph 37) In Re Claim 11, Wolff et al. teach wherein the towing vehicle includes an input and output device (sensors, Paragraph 37) connected to the controller, wherein the input and output device is operable to generate an ejection signal (Signal, Paragraph 37) and communicate the ejection signal to the controller, wherein the controller is operable to control an ejection unit of the baler based on the ejection signal such that the bale is ejected when one of the unloading position or an unloading angle between the drawbar and the baler is achieved. (Paragraph 37) In Re Claim 12, Wolff et al. teach method of operating a baler combination including a towing vehicle (10) having a drive system (10, 22), a baler (12) pulled by the towing vehicle by a drawbar (14), and an actuator (54) connecting the drawbar and the baler, the method comprising; defining an unloading position (Paragraph 10 orientation for depositing material) and an unloading angle between the drawbar and the baler necessary to maneuver the baler into the unloading position, with a controller; (Paragraph 36 and 37) controlling the drive system and the actuator with the controller based on the unloading angle to move the towing vehicle and the baler from a first position (non-adjusted orientation, Paragraph 10) into the unloading position; (Paragraph 36 and 37) and actuating an ejection unit with the controller to eject a bale from the baler when the baler is disposed in the unloading position. (Paragraph 37) Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure: Dommage, Shenk and Boydens et al. teach a tow vehicle, drawbar, actuator and baler. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to GLENN F MYERS whose telephone number is (571)270-1160. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8-4 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Saul Rodriguez can be reached at 571-272-7097. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. GLENN F. MYERS Examiner Art Unit 3652 /GLENN F MYERS/Examiner, Art Unit 3652
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 20, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 19, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12600566
Pallet Transport Means
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12600565
CEILING DEPOSITORY SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12600394
Security bin with a hydraulic lift table
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12583679
ASSET LOADING SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12588466
ARTICLE STORAGE EQUIPMENT IN SEMICONDUCTOR FABRICATION FACILITY AND LOGISTICS SYSTEM INCLUDING SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
77%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+19.5%)
2y 11m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 992 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month