Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026
Application No. 18/581,923

Cable Connector Assembly and Method of Assembling the Same

Final Rejection §102§103
Filed
Feb 20, 2024
Priority
Feb 20, 2023 — CN 202310143351.7
Examiner
NGUYEN, THANG H
Art Unit
2831
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
TE Connectivity Ltd.
OA Round
2 (Final)
85%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 85% — above average
85%
Career Allowance Rate
537 granted / 633 resolved
+16.8% vs TC avg
Strong +15% interview lift
Without
With
+15.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 2m
Avg Prosecution
17 currently pending
Career history
660
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.9%
-39.1% vs TC avg
§103
52.5%
+12.5% vs TC avg
§102
20.6%
-19.4% vs TC avg
§112
24.3%
-15.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 633 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Objections Claim 1 is objected to because of the following informalities: Claim 1 line 7 recites: “to the first connection terminals” should be --to the plurality of first connection terminals-- Claim 1 line 8 recites: “to the second connection terminals” should be --to the plurality of second connection terminals-- Appropriate correction is required. (Note: Applicant is reminded to correct the issues throughout the claim set to prevent from confusing and antecedent basis issues). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-2, 7-9, and 16 are as best understood and is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Miyamura et al. (US 2022/0278488). As per claim 1: Miyamura et al. discloses a cable connector assembly (as shown in fig. 1), comprising: a connector (F) including a first housing 10 having an elongated body with a pair of opposite ends 11/12 and forming a first independent body (wherein the housing 10), a plurality of first connection terminals 20 disposed in the first housing 10 (as shown in fig. 3), a second housing 50 detachably received in the first housing 10 at one end 11 of the first housing 10 and forming a second independent body (wherein the (M) housing 50), and a plurality of second connection terminals 60 disposed in the second housing 50; a plurality of cables (L) respectively connected to the plurality of first connection terminals 20 (as shown in fig. 1); and a printed circuit board (not label, see fig. 1) to which the plurality of second connection terminals 60 are connected (see fig. 7), the two independent bodies (10/50) are separated from each other and assembled with the plurality of cables (L) and the printed circuit board (see fig. 7). As per claims 2, 7-9, : Miyamura et al. discloses the cable connector assembly, wherein a plurality of connection ends of the cables (L) are each connected to one of a plurality of ends of the plurality of first connection terminals 20 (as shown in fig. 1); and wherein the first housing 10 has a first slot 12 and a second slot 11 independent of and integrated with the first slot 12 (as shown in fig. 3); and wherein the plurality of first connection terminals 20 are received in the first slot 12, the second housing 50 and the plurality of second connection terminals 60 are received in the second slot 11 (see fig. 7); and wherein the second housing 50 and the plurality of second connection terminals 60 are detachably received in the second slot 11 (see fig. 7). As per claim 16: Miyamura et al. discloses a method of assembling a cable connector assembly (as shown in fig. 1), comprising: providing a connector (F) including a first housing 10 forming a first independent body (wherein the housing 10), a plurality of first connection terminals 20 disposed in the first housing 10, a second housing 50 forming a second independent body (wherein the (M) housing 50), and a plurality of second connection terminals 60 disposed in the second housing 50, the two independent bodies10/50 are separate from each other (as shown in fig. 1); connecting a plurality of cables (L) to the plurality of first connection terminals 20; connected the plurality second connection terminals 60 to a printed circuit board (not label, see fig. 1); and mounting a combination of the first housing 10, the plurality of first connection terminals 20, and the cables (L) connected to the plurality of first connection terminals 20 onto the printed circuit board (as shown in fig. 10). (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-2, 7-13, 15-16, and 20-21 are as best understood and are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Nozaki et al. (US 2024/0429637). As per claim 1: Nozaki et al. discloses a cable connector assembly, comprising: a connector 10 including a first housing 11 having an elongated body with a pair of opposite ends (see fig. 3) and forming a first independent body 14/15, a plurality of first connection terminals 12 disposed in the first housing 11 (as shown in fig. 3), a second housing 67 detachably received in the first housing 11 at one end of the first housing (see fig. 1, through a coupling portion 59) and forming a second independent body (wherein the 2nd housing 67), and a plurality of second connection terminals (not label, see figs. 2, 7, wherein the terminals are located within the housing 67) disposed in the second housing 67 (see fig. 2); a plurality of cables 48 respectively connected to the first connection terminals 12 (see figs. 3, 7); and a printed circuit board 59 to which the plurality of second connection terminals (wherein the cables 48A are connected to the terminals within the housing 67 (see fig. 2), the two independent bodies 14/15 and 67 are separated from each other and assembled with the plurality of cables 48/48A and the printed circuit board 59 (as shown in fig. 2). As per claims 2, 7-13, 15: Nozaki et al. discloses the cable connector, wherein a plurality of connection ends of the cables 48 are each connected to one of a plurality of ends of the plurality of first connection terminals 12 (as shown in fig. 7); and wherein the first housing 11 has a first slot 19 and a second slot 24 independent of and integrated with the first slot 19 (see figs. 1, 3); and wherein the plurality of first connection terminals 12 are received in the first slot 19, the second housing 67 and the plurality of second connection terminals are received in the second slot 24 (see fig. 2, through a coupling portion); and wherein the second housing 67 and the plurality of second connection terminals are detachably received in the second slot 24 (see fig. 3, through the coupling portion); and wherein the pair of opposite ends of the first housing 11 each have a first fixing portion 35; and wherein the printed circuit board 59 has a pair of second fixing portions 71 at positions corresponding to the opposite ends of the first housing 11; and wherein the first housing 11 is fixed to the printed circuit board 59 by a fastener sequentially passing through one of the first fixing portions 35 and one of the second fixing portions 71 (as shown in fig. 2); and wherein the PCB has an elongated shape (see fig. 1); and wherein the connector is a female electrical connector (see fig. 1). As per claim 16: Nozaki et al. discloses a method of assembling a cable connector assembly, comprising: providing a connector 10 including a first housing 11 forming a first independent body (as shown in fig. 1), a plurality of first connection terminals 12 disposed in the first housing 11, a second housing 67 forming a second independent body (see figs. 1-2), and a plurality of second connection terminals (not label, see figs. 2, 7, wherein the terminals are located within the housing 67) disposed in the second housing 67, the two independent bodies are separate from each other (as shown in figs. 1-2); connecting a plurality of cables 48 to the first connection terminals 12; connected the second connection terminals to a printed circuit board 59 (see fig. 2); and mounting a combination of the first housing 11, the first connection terminals 12, and the cables 48 connected to the plurality of first connection terminals onto the printed circuit board 59 (as shown in fig. 3). As per claim 20: Nozaki et al. discloses the method, wherein mounting the combination of the first housing 11, the plurality of first connection terminals 12, and the cables 48 connected to the plurality of first connection terminals 12 onto the printed circuit board 59 includes: receiving the second housing 67 with the plurality of second connection terminals (within the housing 67) in a second slot of the first housing 11 (as shown in fig. 3); and fixing the first housing 11, with the plurality of first connection terminals 12 and the cables 48, to the printed circuit board 59 by a fastener 72 passing through a first fixing portion 35 on the first housing 11 and a second fixing portion 66 on the printed circuit board 59 (as shown in fig. 1). As per claim 21: Nozaki et al. discloses a method of assembling a cable connector assembly, comprising: providing a connector 10 including a first housing 11, a plurality of first connection terminals 12 disposed in the first housing 10, a second housing 67, and a plurality of second connection terminals (not label, see figs. 2, 7, wherein the terminals are located within the housing 67) disposed in the second housing 67; connecting a plurality of cables 48 to the plurality of first connection terminals 20 (see fig. 1); connected the plurality of second connection terminals to a printed circuit board 59 (as shown in fig. 2); and mounting a combination of the first housing 11, the plurality of first connection terminals 12, and the cables 48 connected to the plurality of first connection terminals 12 onto the printed circuit board 59 (as shown in fig. 3), mounting of the combination includes: receiving the second housing 67 with the second connection terminals (not label, located within the housing 67) in a second slot of the first housing (wherein the 1st and 2nd connector/housing indirectly connected through the PCB); and fixing the first housing 11, with the plurality of first connection terminals 12 and the cables 48, to the printed circuit board 59 by a fastener 72 passing through a first fixing portion 35 on the first housing 11 and a second fixing portion 66 on the printed circuit board 59. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 3-4,6, 14, and 17-19 are as best understood and is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Nozaki et al. (US 2024/0429637). As per claims 3-4, 6, and 17-19: Nozaki et al. discloses the cable connector assembly. However, Nozaki et al. does not explicitly disclose wherein the plurality of connection ends of the cables are connected to the ends of the plurality of first connection terminals by soldering; and wherein the ends of the first connection terminals are combined with the connection ends of the cables by overmolding; and wherein a plurality of ends of the second connection terminals are directly connected to the printed circuit board by soldering. On the other hand, Nozaki et al. mentioned the cables are crimped and electrically connected to the plurality of first connection terminals (see Para. [0048]). However, a person having ordinary skill in the art would know that having different method of connecting the cables to the terminals or to the PCB by soldering or overmolding can only deal with manufacture desire techniques to further enhance a stable, reliable and secure electrical conductivity connection between sources, and to provide a vibration and shock dampening to the connector by overmolding technique. Further, having soldering or overmolding techniques are common knowledge, well known and commonly used in the art of connector to improve the electrical connection between sources. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claim invention to further modify the cable connector assembly of Nozaki et al. by having the plurality of connection ends of the cables are connected to the ends of the plurality of first connection terminals by soldering; and wherein the ends of the first connection terminals are combined with the connection ends of the cables by overmolding; and wherein a plurality of ends of the second connection terminals are directly connected to the printed circuit board by soldering as taught by the instant invention to further enhance a stable, reliable and secure electrical conductivity connection between sources, and to provide a vibration and shock dampening to the connector by overmolding technique. Further, it is obvious to have the soldering method instead crimping, stamping, glueing et al. As per claim 14: Nozaki et al. discloses the cable connector assembly, with cable L and the PCB 59. However, Nozaki et al. does not explicitly disclose wherein the cables are flexible and bendable, the cables are bent around the printed circuit board. On the other hand, Nozaki et al. mentioned there is a flexible/bendable PCB (as shown in fig. 1) in order to accommodate the connector as desire. Although, Nozaki et al. silents wherein the cables are flexible and bendable, the cables are bent around the printed circuit board. However, a person having ordinary skill in the art would know that having the recited limitation above can only deal with manufacture desire design to further adapted between the connector and mating connector with a stable, durable and reliable connection without disruption to the electrical connectivity. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 1-4, 6-20 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to THANG H NGUYEN whose telephone number is (571)270-0288. The examiner can normally be reached 8:30am-6:30pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Abdullah Riyami can be reached at 571-270-3119. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /T.H.N/Examiner, Art Unit 2831 /ABDULLAH A RIYAMI/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2831
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 20, 2024
Application Filed
Apr 30, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
Jul 27, 2026
Response Filed
Oct 13, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12771057
ELECTRICAL CONNECTOR
2y 11m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12763529
COMPACT END OF LINE BRACKET AND CAP
3y 2m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12763508
ELECTRICAL CONNECTOR WITH IMPROVED GROUNDING TERMINALS
2y 11m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12751651
MEASUREMENT DEVICE
3y 1m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12756121
Connection Pin
2y 10m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
85%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+15.1%)
2y 2m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 633 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month