Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/582,756

OUTDOOR SUNSHADE

Final Rejection §102
Filed
Feb 21, 2024
Examiner
HAWK, NOAH CHANDLER
Art Unit
3636
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Zhejiang Yotrio Group Co. Ltd.
OA Round
2 (Final)
62%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 0m
To Grant
84%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 62% of resolved cases
62%
Career Allow Rate
950 granted / 1545 resolved
+9.5% vs TC avg
Strong +22% interview lift
Without
With
+22.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 0m
Avg Prosecution
62 currently pending
Career history
1607
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
41.2%
+1.2% vs TC avg
§102
34.7%
-5.3% vs TC avg
§112
22.1%
-17.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1545 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim 1 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Tung in US Publication 2010/0212705. Tung teaches an outdoor sunshade, comprising: a sunshade post (12); a sunshade frame (3) located on one side of the sunshade post; a handle shell (14) arranged on the sunshade post, wherein the handle shell can move vertically along the sunshade post (see Figs. 1 and 2); an inclined pull rod (4) arranged on the handle shell in a matching manner, the other end of the inclined pull rod matching the sunshade frame; a sunshade cord (13); a sunshade cord winding and unwinding assembly configured to wind or unwind the sunshade cord so as to unfold or fold the sunshade frame; the sunshade cord winding and unwinding assembly comprising a first power component (51) and a second power component (147), wherein the first power component is located in the handle shell and completes power input by means of a driving component (52), and wherein the first power component and the second power component are in power transmission fit (via the portion of cord between 45 and 51); and a cord winding wheel (45) arranged on the second power component in a matching manner, wherein the second power component extends outwards in an axial direction of the inclined pull rod such that the cord winding wheel is located outside the handle shell (see Fig. 4). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2-5 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 3/6/2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. With respect to the applicant’s arguments regarding the Tung reference: please see clarified rejections set forth above. The winding wheel (pulley surface of 45) taught by Tung is an element around which the cord wraps during activation of the drive means of the device, and is driven to move upon motion of the first power component 51 by the portion of cord therebetween. As such, it is considered sufficient to meet the limitations of the claim. Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to NOAH C. HAWK whose telephone number is (571)272-1480. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9am to 5:30pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, David Dunn can be reached at 5712726670. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. NOAH C. HAWK Primary Examiner Art Unit 3636 /Noah Chandler Hawk/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3636
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 21, 2024
Application Filed
Dec 07, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102
Mar 06, 2026
Response Filed
Mar 25, 2026
Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12599206
Umbrella Pole Brace Assembly
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12599207
A Sliding Seat Assembly for an Umbrella
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12582571
MOBILITY SYSTEMS AND METHODS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12575998
CRUTCH WITH A CONTOURED GRIP AND A FOREARM SUPPORT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12575651
Umbrella
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
62%
Grant Probability
84%
With Interview (+22.0%)
2y 0m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1545 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month