Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/582,788

ADJUSTABLE SLEDGE FOR ROUND BALER

Non-Final OA §102§103§112
Filed
Feb 21, 2024
Examiner
HARCOURT, BRAD
Art Unit
3674
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Cnh Industrial America Lllc
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
84%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 7m
To Grant
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 84% — above average
84%
Career Allow Rate
1178 granted / 1402 resolved
+32.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +6% lift
Without
With
+5.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
35 currently pending
Career history
1437
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.1%
-38.9% vs TC avg
§103
48.3%
+8.3% vs TC avg
§102
29.0%
-11.0% vs TC avg
§112
14.6%
-25.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1402 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 2 and 11 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 2 recites “a plurality of rollers” and depends from claim 1 that previously recited “one or more rollers”. It is unclear if these limitations refer to the same rollers or distinct rollers. Appropriate correction or clarification is required. Claim 11 recites “the sledge assembly comprises a plurality of rollers” and depends from claim 1 which previously recited “the sledge assembly comprises an arm and one or more rollers”. It is unclear if these limitations refer to the same rollers or distinct rollers. Appropriate correction or clarification is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-3 and 9-11 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being clearly anticipated by Vansteelant et al. (US Patent No. 4,765,237). Vansteelant discloses a rotary baler (Fig. 1) comprising: a frame 5/6 defining an expandable bale-forming chamber 4/4’; and a sledge assembly 10/12 disposed on and defining a boundary of the expandable bale-forming chamber 4/4’, wherein the sledge assembly 10/12 comprises an arm 10 and one or more rollers 12 that are mounted to the arm 10, wherein the one or more rollers 12 are configured to assist in forming a bale within the chamber 4/4’ (Fig. 1), wherein the arm 10 is pivotable relative to the frame 5/6 about a pivot axis (Fig. 1, the axis of pivot lug 18), and wherein the arm 10 is also independently translatable relative to the frame 5/6 for adjusting a position of the pivot axis 18 (Fig. 1, arm 10 is translated by movement of arm 9). In reference to claim 2, Vansteelant discloses a plurality of rollers 12 that are directly mounted to the arm 10. In reference to claim 3, Vansteelant discloses the sledge assembly 10/12 is configured to translate relative to the frame 5/6 without rotating about the pivot axis 18 (Fig. 1, sledge 10/12 is translated by movement of arm 9). In reference to claim 9, Vansteelant discloses that the rotary baler comprises stationary rollers 8 that are not attached to the arm 10 (Fig. 1). In reference to claim 10, Vansteelant discloses that the stationary rollers 8 and the one or more rollers 12 of the sledge assembly 10/12 are arranged along an arc (Fig. 2). In reference to claim 11, Vansteelant discloses that the sledge assembly 10/12 comprises a plurality of rollers 12, and the plurality of rollers 12 along with the stationary rollers 8 are positioned along the arc (Fig. 2). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 4-8 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Vansteelant et al. (US Patent No. 4,765,237) in view of Smith (US Patent Application Publication No. 2012/0042792). In reference to claim 4, Vansteelant fails to disclose a sensor for sensing a diameter of the bale being formed within the chamber. Smith discloses a sensor 60 sensing a diameter 36 or 60 (pars. 0019 and 0021) of the bale being formed within the chamber. It would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to use a sensor to monitor the size of the bale with a reasonable expectation of success so that the bale can be formed to a desired size. In reference to claim 5, Vansteelant discloses an actuator 28/31 for translating the sledge assembly 10/12 relative to the frame 5/6 (Fig. 2, actuator 28/31 shifts arm 9, causing sledge 10/12 to translate). In reference to claim 6, Smith discloses a controller 100 that receives signals from the sensor 60 and is also configured to control the actuator (par. 0021), wherein the controller 100 is configured to actuate the actuator as a function of the signals received from the sensor 60 (par. 0021, “processor 100 can be programmed to adjust the bale diameter measurement to adjust the bale diameter reading in consideration of the optical sensor displacement”). In reference to claim 6, Smith discloses that the controller 100 is configured to actuate the actuator to translate the sledge assembly so that the bale-forming chamber expands when the sensor 60 senses an increase in bale diameter (par. 0021). In reference to claim 8, Vansteelant discloses that the actuator 28/31 comprises a piston and cylinder arrangement (Fig. 2). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 12-15 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Underhill (US Patent No. 6,145,292) discloses a sledge 20 for a baler 10 (Fig. 1); and Henderson et al. (US Patent No. 5,138,942) discloses a baler 10 with a sledge 68 adjusted by an actuator 106 (Fig. 1). Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to BRAD HARCOURT whose telephone number is (571)272-7303. The examiner can normally be reached Monday through Friday, 9am to 6pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Doug Hutton can be reached at (571)272-4137. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /BRAD HARCOURT/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3674 3/12/26
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 21, 2024
Application Filed
Mar 16, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12595792
Magneto-Hydraulic Plunger Pump Unit
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12588590
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CROP STABILIZATION AND MEASUREMENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12582034
CROP RESIDUE DISTRIBUTOR ASSEMBLY FOR A COMBINE HARVESTER
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12575501
WINDROW PICKER WITH HOLD-DOWN DEVICES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12577872
ORIENTING ENERGY TRANSFER MECHANISM CONNECTIONS HIGH SIDE IN A WELL
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
84%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+5.7%)
2y 7m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1402 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month