Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/582,992

NETWORK SLICE NOTIFICATIONS IN WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Feb 21, 2024
Examiner
IQBAL, KHAWAR
Art Unit
2643
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
T-Mobile Innovations LLC
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
73%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 2m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 73% — above average
73%
Career Allowance Rate
471 granted / 646 resolved
+10.9% vs TC avg
Strong +29% interview lift
Without
With
+29.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 5m
Avg Prosecution
19 currently pending
Career history
674
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
76.1%
+36.1% vs TC avg
§102
21.0%
-19.0% vs TC avg
§112
0.6%
-39.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 646 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-3, 7-10 and 14-17 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Zhu et al (20240205728). Regarding claim 1, Zhu et al discloser, a method, the method comprising (abstract, fig. 1-10): receiving data generated by a diagnostics application (Client applications) hosted by a wireless user device (UE102) that characterizes user behavior (¶ 0052, 0054, FIG. 4, application 310 e.g., DSSC 314 may use a status API 420 to request a slice subscription status request during, for example, an application launch procedure. The status request may indicate a preferred network slice e.g., a slice class identifier, QoS requirements, etc. for application 310. MNO utility application 210 may respond to the status request using status API 420 with subscription information indicating whether or not the user has a current subscription to the requested slice.); correlating the user behavior to a wireless network slice that the user device is not authorized to use (¶ 0054, IAMP 226 and subscription server 224 may exchange information over interface 430 to update a user profile with the new premium network slice subscription. For example, MNO utility application 210 may retrieve subscription plan options for presentation to the user and confirm entitlement with IAMP 226 and ¶ 0055, client application 310 may request presentation of icon 408 when the application is using the premium network slice and application activities e.g., game conditions do not require a premium network slice QoS. ¶ 0064, upon determining that a user does not have a subscription for a preferred network slice and ¶ 0083, the requested slice is not available and ¶ 0018, one or more network slices 112 may be configured to provide premium services e.g., low latency, high QoS, etc. for which a user subscription is required. For example, for optimal performance, an app 108 e.g., a real-time gaming app, etc. on UE 102 may require guaranteed low latency that is not available over standard network connections. If a user/subscriber does not have a subscription to a particular network slice e.g., a network slice providing premium service, an application e.g., app 108 cannot use that network slice); generating a slice notification that identifies the wireless network slice (¶ 0032, the particular field may include an existing PCO/ePCO container or a PCO/ePCO container dedicated to include information indicating a user's slice subscription status. The PCO/ePCO message may be generated by a network device in core network, ¶ 0053, MNO utility application 210 may respond to the subscription request using subscribe API 420 by generating menu 404 to prompt 424 the user to provide user input to approve or deny the requested premium network slice subscription.; and delivering the slice notification to the wireless user device wherein the wireless user device receives and displays (prompt) the slice notification (¶ 0053, MNO utility application 210 may respond to the subscription request using subscribe API 420 by generating menu 404 to prompt 424 the user to provide user input to approve or deny the requested premium network slice subscription, ¶ 0046, 0064, MNO utility application 210 are integrated into client application 310, application 310 may interact with an entitlement server e.g., on IAMP 226 to present network slice subscription/purchase options to the user.). Regarding claims 2, 9, 16, Zhu et al discloser, further comprising: determining service attributes for the wireless network slice based on the user behavior (¶ 0052, 0054, FIG. 4, application 310 e.g., DSSC 314 may use a status API 420 to request a slice subscription status request during, for example, an application launch procedure. The status request may indicate a preferred network slice e.g., a slice class identifier, QoS requirements, etc. for application 310. MNO utility application 210 may respond to the status request using status API 420 with subscription information indicating whether or not the user has a current subscription to the requested slice.); and generating the wireless network slice that comprises the service attributes (¶ 0013, 0055, client application 310 may request presentation of icon 408 when the application is using the premium network slice and application activities e.g., game conditions do not require a premium network slice QoS. ¶ 0064, upon determining that a user does not have a subscription for a preferred network slice and ¶ 0083, the requested slice is not available and ¶ 0018, one or more network slices 112 may be configured to provide premium services e.g., low latency, high QoS, etc. for which a user subscription is required. For example, for optimal performance, an app 108 e.g., a real-time gaming app, etc. on UE 102 may require guaranteed low latency that is not available over standard network connections. If a user/subscriber does not have a subscription to a particular network slice e.g., a network slice providing premium service, an application e.g., app 108 cannot use that network slice). Regarding claims 3, 10, 17, Zhu et al discloser, wherein the service attributes comprise at least one of a Quality-of-Service (QoS), a latency, an uplink throughput, a downlink throughput, a bit rate, or a Guaranteed Bit Rate (GBR) requirement (¶ 0013, 0055, client application 310 may request presentation of icon 408 when the application is using the premium network slice and application activities e.g., game conditions do not require a premium network slice QoS. ¶ 0064, upon determining that a user does not have a subscription for a preferred network slice and ¶ 0083, the requested slice is not available and ¶ 0018, one or more network slices 112 may be configured to provide premium services e.g., low latency, high QoS, etc. for which a user subscription is required. For example, for optimal performance, an app 108 e.g., a real-time gaming app, etc. on UE 102 may require guaranteed low latency that is not available over standard network connections. If a user/subscriber does not have a subscription to a particular network slice e.g., a network slice providing premium service, an application e.g., app 108 cannot use that network slice). Regarding claims 7, 14, Zhu et al discloser, wherein the slice notification comprises a link to purchase a subscription for the wireless network slice (¶ 0053, MNO utility application 210 may respond to the subscription request using subscribe API 420 by generating menu 404 to prompt 424 the user to provide user input to approve or deny the requested premium network slice subscription, ¶ 0046, 0064, MNO utility application 210 are integrated into client application 310, application 310 may interact with an entitlement server e.g., on IAMP 226 to present network slice subscription/purchase options to the user.). Regarding claim 8, Zhu et al disclose, a wireless communication network, the wireless communication network comprising (abstract, fig. 1-10): a network analytics service to: receive data generated by a diagnostics application hosted by a wireless user device that characterizes user behavior (¶ 0052, 0054, FIG. 4, application 310 e.g., DSSC 314 may use a status API 420 to request a slice subscription status request during, for example, an application launch procedure. The status request may indicate a preferred network slice e.g., a slice class identifier, QoS requirements, etc. for application 310. MNO utility application 210 may respond to the status request using status API 420 with subscription information indicating whether or not the user has a current subscription to the requested slice.); correlate the user behavior to a wireless network slice that the user device is not authorized to use (¶ 0054, IAMP 226 and subscription server 224 may exchange information over interface 430 to update a user profile with the new premium network slice subscription. For example, MNO utility application 210 may retrieve subscription plan options for presentation to the user and confirm entitlement with IAMP 226 and ¶ 0055, client application 310 may request presentation of icon 408 when the application is using the premium network slice and application activities e.g., game conditions do not require a premium network slice QoS. ¶ 0064, upon determining that a user does not have a subscription for a preferred network slice and ¶ 0083, the requested slice is not available and ¶ 0018, one or more network slices 112 may be configured to provide premium services e.g., low latency, high QoS, etc. for which a user subscription is required. For example, for optimal performance, an app 108 e.g., a real-time gaming app, etc. on UE 102 may require guaranteed low latency that is not available over standard network connections. If a user/subscriber does not have a subscription to a particular network slice e.g., a network slice providing premium service, an application e.g., app 108 cannot use that network slice); and a slice notification system to: generate a slice notification that identifies the wireless network slice; and deliver the slice notification to the wireless user device wherein the wireless user device receives and displays the slice notification (¶ 0053, MNO utility application 210 may respond to the subscription request using subscribe API 420 by generating menu 404 to prompt 424 the user to provide user input to approve or deny the requested premium network slice subscription, ¶ 0046, 0064, MNO utility application 210 are integrated into client application 310, application 310 may interact with an entitlement server e.g., on IAMP 226 to present network slice subscription/purchase options to the user.). Regarding claim 15, Zhu et al disclose, one of more non-transitory computer readable storage media having program instructions stored thereon, wherein the program instruction, when executed by a computing system, direct the computing system to perform operations (abstract, ¶ 0077), the operations comprising: receiving data generated by a diagnostics application hosted by a wireless user device that characterizes user behavior (¶ 0052, 0054, FIG. 4, application 310 e.g., DSSC 314 may use a status API 420 to request a slice subscription status request during, for example, an application launch procedure. The status request may indicate a preferred network slice e.g., a slice class identifier, QoS requirements, etc. for application 310. MNO utility application 210 may respond to the status request using status API 420 with subscription information indicating whether or not the user has a current subscription to the requested slice.); correlating the user behavior to a wireless network slice that the user device is not authorized to use (¶ 0054, IAMP 226 and subscription server 224 may exchange information over interface 430 to update a user profile with the new premium network slice subscription. For example, MNO utility application 210 may retrieve subscription plan options for presentation to the user and confirm entitlement with IAMP 226 and ¶ 0055, client application 310 may request presentation of icon 408 when the application is using the premium network slice and application activities e.g., game conditions do not require a premium network slice QoS. ¶ 0064, upon determining that a user does not have a subscription for a preferred network slice and ¶ 0083, the requested slice is not available and ¶ 0018, one or more network slices 112 may be configured to provide premium services e.g., low latency, high QoS, etc. for which a user subscription is required. For example, for optimal performance, an app 108 e.g., a real-time gaming app, etc. on UE 102 may require guaranteed low latency that is not available over standard network connections. If a user/subscriber does not have a subscription to a particular network slice e.g., a network slice providing premium service, an application e.g., app 108 cannot use that network slice); generating a slice notification that identifies the wireless network slice (¶ 0013, 0055, client application 310 may request presentation of icon 408 when the application is using the premium network slice and application activities e.g., game conditions do not require a premium network slice QoS. ¶ 0064, upon determining that a user does not have a subscription for a preferred network slice and ¶ 0083, the requested slice is not available and ¶ 0018, one or more network slices 112 may be configured to provide premium services e.g., low latency, high QoS, etc. for which a user subscription is required. For example, for optimal performance, an app 108 e.g., a real-time gaming app, etc. on UE 102 may require guaranteed low latency that is not available over standard network connections. If a user/subscriber does not have a subscription to a particular network slice e.g., a network slice providing premium service, an application e.g., app 108 cannot use that network slice); and delivering the slice notification to the wireless user device wherein the wireless user device receives and displays the slice notification (¶ 0053, MNO utility application 210 may respond to the subscription request using subscribe API 420 by generating menu 404 to prompt 424 the user to provide user input to approve or deny the requested premium network slice subscription, ¶ 0046, 0064, MNO utility application 210 are integrated into client application 310, application 310 may interact with an entitlement server e.g., on IAMP 226 to present network slice subscription/purchase options to the user.). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claim(s) 4-6, 11-13 and 18-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Zhu et al (20240205728) in view of YANG (20230081061). Regarding claims 4-6, Zhu et al discloser, ¶ 0012, the URSP framework provides traffic steering rules for the UE device and enables the UE device to determine how a certain application should be handled in the context of traffic routing to an appropriate network slice, ¶ 0043, a client application 310 may include a video streaming application, a web browser, a gaming application, etc. Some client applications 310 may require relatively high uplink and/or downlink throughput/bandwidth for an optimal user experience. Such client applications 310 make use of network slicing, and, more particularly, a network slice 112 providing premium services. Other client applications 310 may not have requirements for any particular network slice and may generate data processed as default Internet traffic. Client application 310 may include application logic 312 and a slicing subscription client DSSC 314. Regarding claims 4, 11 and 18, Zhu et al does not specifically disclose in detail, application usage, application type. In the same field of endeavor, YANG discloses, in more detail, application usage, application type, uplink data volume, and downlink data volume (¶ 0032-0033 and 0044). Therefore, before the effective filing date of the claim invention, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made to modify the device of Zhu et al by specifically adding feature in order to enhance system performance to the method enables realizing network slice selecting process according to actual requirement of the application program in flexible and accurate manner so as to effectively improve network use experience of a user as taught by YANG. Regarding claims 5, 12 and 19, Zhu et al does not specifically disclose in detail, categorizing the wireless user device based on the application usage, application type. In the same field of endeavor, YANG discloses, in more detail, categorizing the wireless user device based on the application usage, application type, uplink data volume, and downlink data volume and selecting the wireless network slice based on the categorization (¶ 0031-0033 and 0044). Therefore, before the effective filing date of the claim invention, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made to modify the device of Zhu et al by specifically adding feature in order to enhance system performance to the method enables realizing network slice selecting process according to actual requirement of the application program in flexible and accurate manner so as to effectively improve network use Regarding claims 6, 13 and 20, Zhu et al does not specifically disclose in detail, wherein the categorization associates a user type with a wireless network slice type. In the same field of endeavor, YANG discloses, in more detail, wherein the categorization associates a user type with a wireless network slice type (¶ 0031-0033 and 0044). Therefore, before the effective filing date of the claim invention, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made to modify the device of Zhu et al by specifically adding feature in order to enhance system performance to the method enables realizing network slice selecting process according to actual requirement of the application program in flexible and accurate manner so as to effectively improve network use experience of a user as taught by YANG. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KHAWAR IQBAL whose telephone number is (571)272-7909. The examiner can normally be reached M-F. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jinsong Hu can be reached at 5712723965. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /KHAWAR IQBAL/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2643
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 21, 2024
Application Filed
Mar 27, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12621647
TERMINAL ROAMING GUIDANCE METHOD, ELECTRONIC DEVICE, AND STORAGE MEDIUM
10m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12615580
TECHNIQUE FOR PERFORMING MULTI-LINK COMMUNICATION IN WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM
3y 7m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Patent 12597354
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR IDENTIFYING A VEHICLE ASSET PAIRING
1y 9m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12587826
Roaming for UE of a NPN
2y 9m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12580881
METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR DELAYING MESSAGE NOTIFICATIONS
2y 8m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
73%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+29.0%)
3y 5m (~1y 2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 646 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month