Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026
Application No. 18/583,018

REMOTE DIAGNOSTICS OF RESPIRATORY THERAPY DEVICES

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Feb 21, 2024
Priority
May 27, 2014 — AU 2014901997 +4 more
Examiner
LAU, TUNG S
Art Unit
2857
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
ResMed
OA Round
5 (Final)
83%
Grant Probability
Favorable
6-7
OA Rounds
2m
Est. Remaining
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 83% — above average
83%
Career Allowance Rate
959 granted / 1155 resolved
+15.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+14.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
44 currently pending
Career history
1199
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
24.5%
-15.5% vs TC avg
§103
27.2%
-12.8% vs TC avg
§102
26.8%
-13.2% vs TC avg
§112
15.9%
-24.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1155 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . DETAILED ACTION Claims status Claims 1-4 and 6-21 amended on 05/22/2026. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-4 and 6-21 21 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Pysnik (WO 2008/057952 Published: 15 May 2008, CPC G16H 10/60) in view of PUJOL, CN 102933251 A, Date Published: 2013-02-13, CPC A61M 16/205. Further in view of Psynik (US Patent Application Publication 20080114689, Date Published: May 15, 2008) Regarding claim 1: Pysnik described a system comprising one or more servers configured to: transmit a first graphical layout over a network to a computing device for display (page 8, display patient identification data 64), wherein the first graphical layout comprises a search field; receive a search query entered into the search field for (a) one or more patients (page 9, search parameter), each of which is associated with a respiratory therapy device (page 9, respiration to identify breathing patterns), and (b) one or more of the respiratory therapy devices associated with the one or more patients; transmit a list of patients or a list of respiratory therapy devices (0048, the system may examine the data associated with respiration to identify breathing patterns such the patient, and, in particular, abnormal breathing patterns such as Cheyne Stokes Respiration (CSR), list of patients fig. 74, Bill, Doe etc ) over the network (0014, over network) to the computing device for display in the first graphical layout in response to receiving the search query (page 9, the listing of patient data 80); transmit a second graphical layout over the network to the computing device for display, wherein the second graphical layout comprises (a) information about a selected respiratory therapy device that is (i) in the list of respiratory therapy devices (fig. 5, ACME24, ACME 8) or (ii) associated with a patient in the list of patients and (b) current settings of the selected respiratory therapy device (fig. 5, Aaron Ginifer P-Acme24 , Adam Judi-Acme 6 ), wherein the information about the selected respiratory therapy device comprises a model number or a serial number (page 12, serial number), and wherein the current settings of the selected respiratory therapy device comprise a pressure setting (page 12, pressure setting), a humidity setting, a temperature setting, an automatic start setting, or an automatic stop setting; receive an adjustment request entered through the second graphical layout for adjusting at least one of the current settings of the selected respiratory therapy device (page 14, adjusted by user 14); and transmit over a network (0014, over network) a command to the selected respiratory therapy device in response to receiving the adjustment request (page 20, selects send button 140, fig. 15, send 140). Pysnik does not described wherein the adjustment to the at least one of the current settings comprises adjusting the humidity setting. PUJOL described wherein the adjustment to the at least one of the current settings comprises adjusting the humidity setting (page 8, controlled desired humidification level), to have consistent humidifying quantity to the user to meet user requirement, environmental conditions. (page 8). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made to modify Pysnik to have the adjustment to the at least one of the current settings comprises adjusting the humidity setting taught by PUJOL to have consistent humidifying quantity to the user to meet user requirement, environmental conditions. Pysnik (WO 2008/057952) and PUJOL not described remotely. Psynik (US Patent Application Publication 20080114689) described remotely (0014, system 10 allows user 14 to program and interact with any remote patient device 16 or communications device 1), to have easy control. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made to modify Pysnik (WO) to have remotely taught by Psynik (US) to have easy control. Regarding claim 19: Pysnik described a method comprising: transmitting a first graphical layout over a network to a computing device for display (page 8, display patient identification data 64), wherein the first graphical layout comprises a search field ;receiving a search query entered into the search field for (a) one or more patients (page 9, search parameter), each of which is associated with a respiratory therapy device (page 9, respiration to identify breathing patterns), and (b) one or more of the respiratory therapy devices associated with the one or more patients (0048, the system may examine the data associated with respiration to identify breathing patterns such the patient, and, in particular, abnormal breathing patterns such as Cheyne Stokes Respiration (CSR), list of patients fig. 74, Bill, Doe etc ) ; transmitting over the network (0014, over network) a list of patients or a list of respiratory therapy devices over the network to the computing device for display in the first graphical layout in response to receiving the search query (page 9, the listing of patient data 80); transmitting a second graphical layout over the network to the computing device for display, wherein the second graphical layout comprises (a) information about a selected respiratory therapy device that is (i) in the list of respiratory therapy devices (fig. 5, ACME24, ACME 8) or (ii) associated with a patient in the list of patients and (b) current settings of the selected respiratory therapy device (fig. 5, Aaron Ginifer P-Acme24 , Adam Judi-Acme 6 ), wherein the information about the selected respiratory therapy device comprises a model number or a serial number (page 12, serial number), and wherein the current settings of the selected respiratory therapy device comprise a pressure setting (page 12, pressure setting), a humidity setting, a temperature setting, an automatic start setting, or an automatic stop setting; receiving an adjustment request entered through the second graphical layout for adjusting at least one of the current settings of the selected respiratory therapy device(page 14, adjusted by user 14); and transmitting over the network (0014, over network) a command to the selected respiratory therapy device in response to receiving the adjustment request (page 20, selects send button 140, fig. 15, send 140), wherein the command instructs the selected respiratory therapy device to implement the adjustment to the at least one of the current settings (page 12 ,the features of Fig. 15: In particular, once the appropriate settings are selected, prescription data 102 can be sent to a Smartcard 22 or directly to patient device 16 by selecting send button 140”). Pysnik does not described wherein the adjustment to the at least one of the current settings comprises adjusting the humidity setting. PUJOL described wherein the adjustment to the at least one of the current settings comprises adjusting the humidity setting (page 8, controlled desired humidification level), to have consistent humidifying quantity to the user to meet user requirement, environmental conditions. (page 8). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made to modify Pysnik to have the adjustment to the at least one of the current settings comprises adjusting the humidity setting taught by PUJOL to have consistent humidifying quantity to the user to meet user requirement, environmental conditions. Pysnik (WO 2008/057952) and PUJOL not described remotely. Psynik (US Patent Application Publication 20080114689) described remotely (0014, system 10 allows user 14 to program and interact with any remote patient device 16 or communications device 1), to have easy control. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made to modify Pysnik (WO) to have remotely taught by Psynik (US) to have easy control. Regarding claim 20: Pysnik described a non-transitory computer readable storage medium having instructions stored thereon that, when executed by one or more processors, cause the one or more processors to (page 2, a computer-implemented system with data): transmit a first graphical layout over a network to a computing device for display (page 8, display patient identification data 64), wherein the first graphical layout comprises a search field (page 9, search parameter); receive a search query entered into the search field for (a) one or more patients, each of which is associated with a respiratory therapy device (page 9, respiration to identify breathing patterns), and (b) one or more respiratory therapy devices associated with the one or more patients; transmit a list of patients or a list of respiratory therapy devices (0048, the system may examine the data associated with respiration to identify breathing patterns such the patient, and, in particular, abnormal breathing patterns such as Cheyne Stokes Respiration (CSR), list of patients fig. 74, Bill, Doe etc ) over the network (0014, over network) to the computing device for display in the first graphical layout in response to receiving the search query (page 9, the listing of patient data 80); transmit a second graphical layout over the network to the computing device for display, wherein the second graphical layout comprises (a) information about a selected respiratory therapy device that is (i) in the list of respiratory therapy devices (fig. 5, ACME24, ACME 8) or (ii) associated with a patient in the list of patients and (b) current settings of the selected respiratory therapy device (fig. 5, Aaron Ginifer P-Acme24 , Adam Judi-Acme 6 ), wherein the information about the selected respiratory therapy device comprises a model number (page 12, serial number) or a serial number, and wherein the current settings of the selected respiratory therapy device comprise a pressure setting (page 12, pressure setting), a humidity setting, a temperature setting, an automatic start setting, or an automatic stop setting;receive an adjustment request entered through the second graphical layout for adjusting at least one of the current settings of the selected respiratory therapy device (page 14, adjusted by user 14); and transmit over the network (0014, over network) a command to the selected respiratory therapy device in response to receiving the adjustment request, wherein the command instructs the selected respiratory therapy device to implement the adjustment to the at least one of the current settings (page 12 ,the features of Fig. 15: In particular, once the appropriate settings are selected, prescription data 102 can be sent to a Smartcard 22 or directly to patient device 16 by selecting send button 140”). Pysnik does not described wherein the adjustment to the at least one of the current settings comprises adjusting the humidity setting. PUJOL described wherein the adjustment to the at least one of the current settings comprises adjusting the humidity setting (page 8, controlled desired humidification level), to have consistent humidifying quantity to the user to meet user requirement, environmental conditions. (page 8). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made to modify Pysnik to have the adjustment to the at least one of the current settings comprises adjusting the humidity setting taught by PUJOL to have consistent humidifying quantity to the user to meet user requirement, environmental conditions. Pysnik (WO 2008/057952) and PUJOL not described remotely. Psynik (US Patent Application Publication 20080114689) described remotely (0014, system 10 allows user 14 to program and interact with any remote patient device 16 or communications device 1), to have easy control. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made to modify Pysnik (WO) to have remotely taught by Psynik (US) to have easy control. Regarding claim 2, Pysnik further described wherein the second graphical layout is transmitted in response to receiving identifying information for the selected respiratory therapy device (fig. 5, AEME 24, ACME 6, fig. 13, device model). Regarding claim 3, Pysnik further described wherein the adjustment to the at least one of the current settings comprises adjusting the pressure setting (page 3, adjusts the pressure). Regarding claim 4, Pysnik further described wherein adjusting the pressure setting comprises setting an expiratory pressure level (page 4, 6, level pressure). Regarding claim 6, Pysnik further described wherein adjusting the humidity setting comprises increasing or decreasing a humidity of a flow of breathable gas delivered to a patient by the selected respiratory therapy device (page 4, increased compliance monitoring, page 12, humidifier data). Regarding claim 7, Pysnik further described adjusting the temperature setting (page 2, environment in the area of patient, page 19, adjustment). Regarding claim 8, Pysnik further described increasing or decreasing a temperature of a flow of breathable gas delivered to a patient by the selected respiratory therapy device (page 4, increased compliance monitoring, page 3, flow of fluid to the airway of the patient). Regarding claim 9, Pysnik further described wherein the adjustment to the at least one of the current settings comprises enabling or disabling at least one of the automatic start setting or the automatic stop setting (page 17, automatically or selectively). Regarding claim 10, Pysnik further described wherein the automatic start setting causes the selected respiratory therapy device to automatically begin a treatment when a patient puts on a patient interface of the selected respiratory therapy device, and wherein the automatic stop setting causes the selected respiratory therapy device to automatically end the treatment when the patient takes off the patient interface (page 17, automatically or selectively downloading process). Regarding claim 11, Pysnik further described information about a detected fault associated with the selected respiratory therapy device (page 8, the system may examine the data associated with respiration to identify breathing patterns such the patient), and wherein the adjustment to the at least one of the current settings addresses the detected fault (page 17, auto error/alert window). Regarding claim 12, Pysnik further described wherein the one or more servers are further configured to receive diagnostic data relating to the detected fault after a patient has stopped using the selected respiratory therapy device for a predetermined period of time (page 17, auto error/alert window , page 21, plan name, expiration time period). Regarding claim 13, Pysnik further described wherein one or more fault icons are displayed in the first graphical layout for one or more of the respiratory therapy devices in the list of respiratory therapy devices that have experienced a fault (page 26, icons, page 28, therapy and error information from remote devices). Regarding claim 14, Pysnik further described wherein the one or more servers are further configured to transmit a log of diagnostic data to the computing device in response to receiving a selection of one of the fault icons (page 21, log, page 26, icons, page 28, therapy and error information from remote devices). Regarding claim 15, Pysnik further described wherein one or more usage icons are displayed in the first graphical layout for one or more of the respiratory therapy devices in the list of respiratory therapy devices (page 21, patient device 16, page 26, icons, page 28, therapy and error information from remote devices). Regarding claim 16, Pysnik further described wherein at least one of the usage icons indicates whether an air leak was detected (page 25, leak notifications). Regarding claim 17, Pysnik further described wherein the one or more servers are further configured to transmit a third graphical layout over the network to the computing device for display, and wherein the third graphical layout comprises a log of activities that have occurred on the selected respiratory therapy device during a predetermined period of time (fig, 44, AME24 multiple graphical layout time graph). Regarding claim 18, Pysnik further described wherein the third graphical layout comprises a date, a time, and a description of each activity (fig. 44, date time of ACEM44 therapy data). Regarding claim 21, Pysnik further described information about ambient conditions of the selected respiratory therapy device (page 12, pressure setting). Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments with respect to the amended claims have been fully considered the argument as follow The prior art fail to show one or more of the respiratory therapy devices associated with the one or more patients, over the network and remotely Psynik (WO) described one or more of the respiratory therapy devices associated with the one or more patients (0048, the system may examine the data associated with respiration to identify breathing patterns such the patient, and, in particular, abnormal breathing patterns such as Cheyne Stokes Respiration (CSR), list of patients fig. 74, Bill, Doe etc ) Psynik (US Patent Application Publication 20080114689) described remotely (0014, system 10 allows user 14 to program and interact with any remote patient device 16 or communications device 1), to have easy control. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made to modify Pysnik (WO) to have remotely taught by Psynik (US) to have easy control. one or more of the respiratory therapy devices associated with the one or more patients (0048, the system may examine the data associated with respiration to identify breathing patterns such the patient, and, in particular, abnormal breathing patterns such as Cheyne Stokes Respiration (CSR), list of patients fig. 74, Bill, Doe etc ) ; transmitting over the network (0014, over network) Note: prior art Psynik (US Patent Application Publication 20080114689) was submitted by the applicant in an IDS on 07/08/2026 after the previous NF on 06/08/2026 This final was both necessitate by the IDS and amendment filed by the applicant. In view of the above analysis, the examiner respectfully disagreed with the applicant argument, applicant's arguments filed 09/23/2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Applicant's submission of an information disclosure statement under 37 CFR 1.97(c) with the timing fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(p) on 07/08/2026 prompted the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 609.04(b). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Contact information 4. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Tung Lau whose telephone number is (571)272-2274, email is Tungs.lau@uspto.gov. The examiner can normally be reached on Tuesday-Friday 7:00 AM-5:00 PM EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, TURNER SHELBY, can be reached on 571-272-6334. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see https://ppair-my.uspto.gov/pair/PrivatePair. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll- free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272- 1000. /TUNG S LAU/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2857 Technology Center 2800 October 2, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 7 earlier events
Mar 27, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
May 22, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
May 27, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jun 04, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Jul 07, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Jul 07, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Sep 23, 2026
Response Filed
Oct 06, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12768869
METHOD FOR PROCESSING ANISOTROPIC MAGNETIZED PLASMA MEDIUM AND SYSTEM THEREOF
2y 11m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12769279
APPARATUS FOR DETERMINING THE ACTUAL STATE AND/OR THE REMAINING SERVICE LIFE OF STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS OF A WORK MACHINE
2y 11m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12761627
METHOD AND DEVICE FOR MONITORING A MILLING MACHINE
3y 7m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12752664
IDENTIFYING A ROOT CAUSE OF BATTERY CELL DEGRADATION IN A BATTERY PACK
3y 5m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12754175
ARTIFICAL INTELLIGENCE APPARATUS FOR DETECTING TARGET GAS IN SMALL SAMPLE DOMAIN AND OPERATING METHOD THEREOF
2y 10m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

6-7
Expected OA Rounds
83%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+14.5%)
2y 10m (~2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 1155 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month