Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/583,028

SYSTEM INCLUDING FIRST DEVICE AND SECOND DEVICE CONFIRMING WHETHER FIRST DEVICE HAS COMPLETED CONNECTION WITH SERVER

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Feb 21, 2024
Examiner
RASHID, ISHRAT
Art Unit
2459
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Brother Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
58%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 2m
To Grant
78%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 58% of resolved cases
58%
Career Allow Rate
115 granted / 198 resolved
At TC average
Strong +20% interview lift
Without
With
+19.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 2m
Avg Prosecution
22 currently pending
Career history
220
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
7.0%
-33.0% vs TC avg
§103
53.5%
+13.5% vs TC avg
§102
15.5%
-24.5% vs TC avg
§112
17.8%
-22.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 198 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . This communication is in response to Application 18/583,028 filed on 21 February, 2024. This Application claims priority from Japanese Patent Application No. 2023-028984 filed on February 27, 2023. Claims 1-11 are pending. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1, 10 and 11 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Haapanen et al (US 2023/0291642). Regarding claim 1, Haapanen teaches a system (fig.1) comprising: a plurality of devices each connected to a network, the plurality of devices including a first device and a second device (Haapanen fig.1 110-114, 120-124); and a server comprising a storage device, the server being configured to communicate over the network (Haapanen fig.1 140-144), the second device being configured to perform: confirming, in a state where the second device has completed a connection with the server, whether each of one or more devices of the plurality of devices other than the second device has completed a connection with the server, the one or more devices including the first device (Haapanen [0021]- [0024] “…automatically by mediation service when it initially detects a connection to the local network; or (c) based on receiving a request from CBMS 140. The use and frequency of a network search may be configurable in order to comply with the enterprise's IT security policies and to minimize the network traffic. Examples of data that a network search discovers pertaining to an output device include an IP address of the output device and a type of the output device, such as a printer, scanner, etc. After the discovery of one or more output devices, the mediation service reports the newly discovered output devices to CBMS 140”); and transmitting, when the first device is in a specific state in which the first device has not completed a connection with the server, first device identification information and first status information to the server, the first device identification information being identification information for identifying the first device, the first status information indicating a status of the first device (Haapanen [0041]-[0044] “For each discovered output device that has not been assigned a mediation service, CBMS 140 determines an active (or primary) mediation service for that output device based on the list of potential mediation services identified in the previous step. The active mediation service for each output device may be randomly selected. However, this may result in an imbalance of the number of output devices assigned to each mediation service. For example, three output devices might be assigned to a first mediation service, eight output devices may be assigned to a second mediation service, and nineteen output devices may be assigned to a third mediation service”), the server being configured to perform: storing, in response to acquiring the first device identification information and the first status information which are transmitted from the second device in the transmitting, the acquired first device identification information and the acquired first status information in the storage device in association with administrator identification information associated with the second device, the administrator identification information associated with the second device being identification information for identifying an administrator associated with the second device (Haapanen [0023]). Regarding claim 10, this claim contains limitations found within those of claim 1, and the same rationale of rejection applies, where applicable. Regarding claim 11, this claim contains limitations found within those of claim 1, and the same rationale of rejection applies, where applicable. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2-9 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure: Kouno et al (US 2017/0093985), Takahashi et al (US 2019/0012123). Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ISHRAT RASHID whose telephone number is (571)272-5372. The examiner can normally be reached on 10AM-6PM EST M-F. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Tonia L Dollinger can be reached on 571-272-4170. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see https://ppair-my.uspto.gov/pair/PrivatePair. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /I.R/Examiner, Art Unit 2459 /SCHQUITA D GOODWIN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2459
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 21, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 21, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12603930
CONTENT DELIVERY
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12598109
NETWORK PERFORMANCE EVALUATION USING AI-BASED NETWORK CLONING
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12587586
REDUCING LATENCY AND OPTIMIZING PROXY NETWORKS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12587593
DATA TRANSMISSION METHOD AND APPARATUS, DEVICE, AND STORAGE MEDIUM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12562993
PACKET FRAGMENTATION PREVENTION IN AN SDWAN ROUTER
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
58%
Grant Probability
78%
With Interview (+19.9%)
3y 2m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 198 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month