Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 06, 2026
Application No. 18/583,266

COMPOSITE SPRING AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING SAME

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Feb 21, 2024
Priority
May 19, 2023 — CA 3200023
Examiner
SAHNI, VISHAL R
Art Unit
3616
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Carsolia Composites Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
76%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
95%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 76% — above average
76%
Career Allowance Rate
750 granted / 993 resolved
+23.5% vs TC avg
Strong +19% interview lift
Without
With
+19.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
33 currently pending
Career history
1026
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.9%
-39.1% vs TC avg
§103
41.2%
+1.2% vs TC avg
§102
31.0%
-9.0% vs TC avg
§112
25.6%
-14.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 993 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION This is a first Non-Final Office Action on the merits in response to the application filed 02/21/24. The request for foreign priority to a corresponding CN application filed 05/19/23 has been received and is proper. The Response to the Restriction filed 06/18/26 has been entered. Claims 1-3, 5-7, 9, 12, 15-23, 25-29, 31-33, 35-38, and 40-47 are currently pending. Claims 1-3, 5-7, 9, 12, 15-23 and 25 have been elected. All elected claims are rejected as detailed below. The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Claims 26-29, 31-33, 35-38, and 40-47 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on 06/18/26. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Petrina Claim(s) 1-3, 5-6, 12, 15-23 and 25 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Petrina (U.S. Patent Pub. No. 2002/0158392). Petrina is directed to a multi-helical composite spring. See Abstract. Claim 1: Petrina discloses a composite spring [Figs. 1, 2] for a vehicle suspension [see para. 0002], the composite spring comprising: a tube made from a fiber-reinforced composite material [see para. 0006, 0008-10] and having a longitudinal axis, the tube including: a first axial end (112) having a closed shape that completely surrounds the longitudinal axis [see para. 0042, 0044 (“full circle”)]; a second axial end (114) axially opposite the first axial end relative to the longitudinal axis; and one or more openings formed through a wall (at 110, 130, 140, 150) of the tube and disposed axially between the first axial end and the second axial end [see Figs. 1, 2 (spaces between 110, 130, 140 and 150)], a portion of the wall adjacent the one or more openings defining a resilient member of the spring [see para. 0032]. See Figs. 1, 2. Claim 2: Petrina discloses that the resilient member is a coil. See Figs. 1, 2; para. 0032. Claim 3: Petrina discloses that the one or more openings define a cellular structure and the resilient member is part of the cellular structure. See Figs. 1, 2. Claim 5: Petrina discloses that the tube has a circular radially-inner profile when viewed along the longitudinal axis. See para. 0042, 0044 (“full circle”). Claim 6: Petrina discloses that the tube has a circular radially-outer profile when viewed along the longitudinal axis. See para. 0042, 0044 (“full circle”). Claim 12: Petrina discloses that the closed shape is a first closed shape; and the second axial end has a second closed shape that completely surrounds the longitudinal axis. See para. 0042, 0044 (“full circle”). Claim 15: Petrina discloses that the wall of the tube includes a plurality of stacked layers of fibers wrapped around the longitudinal axis; and the layers are stitched together. See para. 0006. Claim 16: Petrina discloses that the resilient member is a coil; the coil has first helix angle; and the layers are stitched together along a stitch line having a second helix angle substantially equal to the first helix angle. See para. 0030. Claim 17: Petrina discloses that the fibers are arranged in a weave in at least one of the layers. See para. 0006 (fibers are “interwoven”). Claim 18: Petrina discloses that the wall of the tube includes a pleated sheet of fibers wrapped around the longitudinal axis. See para. 0006, 0008-10, 0013, 0015. Claim 19: Petrina discloses that one or more pleats of the pleated sheet are oriented at least partially radially relative to the longitudinal axis. See para. 0006, 0008-10, 0013, 0015. Claim 20: Petrina discloses that the pleated sheet of fibers is a first pleated sheet of fibers; and the wall of the tube includes a second pleated sheet of fibers overlaying and meshing with the first pleated sheet of fibers. See para. 0006, 0008-10, 0013, 0015. Claim 21: Petrina discloses that the wall of the tube includes an outer non-pleated sheet of fibers disposed radially outward of the pleated sheet of fibers and wrapped around the longitudinal axis. See para. 0006, 0008-10, 0013, 0015. Claim 22: Petrina discloses that the wall of the tube includes an inner non-pleated sheet of fibers disposed radially inward of the pleated sheet of fibers and wrapped around the longitudinal axis. See para. 0006, 0008-10, 0013, 0015. Claim 23: Petrina discloses that the wall of the tube includes a plurality of stiches extending through the pleated sheet of fibers. See para. 0032 (“interweaving”). Claim 25: Petrina discloses a vehicle including the composite spring defined in claim 1. See para. 0002. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Petrina in view of Sato Claim(s) 7 and 9 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Petrina in view of Sato (U.S. Patent No. 5,062,619). Sato is directed to a non-linear spring. See Abstract. Claims 7 and 9: Petrina is relied upon as in claim 1 above but discloses that the tube has a radially-inner and radially-outer circular, rather than “non-circular,” profile. Sato discloses a composite spring [Fig. 8] with an axial end having a closed shape surrounding the longitudinal axis, a wall (3) defining a resilient member with openings (2) disposed between the axial ends, wherein the tube has a non-circular radially-outer profile when viewed along the longitudinal axis, wherein the tube has a non-circular radially-inner profile when viewed along the longitudinal axis. See Fig. 8 (square-shaped inside and outside); see also col. 6, lines 1-9 (triangular or hexagonal). It would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art at the effective filing date of the invention to use a non-circular profile because it is merely a design choice, based on the particular use of the composite spring. In addition, it would be obvious to try, since only two possibilities exist here – circular and non-circular. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to VISHAL R SAHNI whose telephone number is (571)270-3838. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 7am-3pm PST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Robert Siconolfi can be reached at 571-272-7124. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. VISHAL SAHNI Primary Examiner Art Unit 3657 /VISHAL R SAHNI/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3616 July 16, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 21, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 21, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12697949
DISTRIBUTED ARCHITECTURE OF AIRCRAFT BRAKING SYSTEM
3y 8m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12698608
Roadway crash cushion
2y 7m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12687209
SELF-RETAINING SPRING FOR FLAT-WIPING CONTACTS
3y 7m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12686242
Air dryer housing, air dryer assembly, compressed-air supply system, and vehicle
3y 1m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12680591
SHOCK ABSORBER FOR AUTOMOBILE WITH ADAPTIVE DAMPING
3y 1m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
76%
Grant Probability
95%
With Interview (+19.4%)
2y 6m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 993 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month