Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 18, 2026
Application No. 18/583,710

INTEGRATED USER HEALTH AND WELLNESS MANAGEMENT

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Feb 21, 2024
Examiner
SMALL, NAOMI J
Art Unit
2685
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Toyota Motor Corporation
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
64%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
4m
Est. Remaining
88%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 64% of resolved cases
64%
Career Allowance Rate
502 granted / 789 resolved
+1.6% vs TC avg
Strong +24% interview lift
Without
With
+23.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
19 currently pending
Career history
820
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.3%
-37.7% vs TC avg
§103
68.4%
+28.4% vs TC avg
§102
18.5%
-21.5% vs TC avg
§112
8.2%
-31.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 789 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on June 08, 2026 has been entered. Claims 1 and 10 have been amended. Claims 16-18 have been cancelled. Claims 26-28 have been newly added. Claims 1, 3-4, 6-10, 12-14 and 20-28 are currently pending. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112(a): (a) IN GENERAL.—The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor or joint inventor of carrying out the invention. The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112: The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention. Claims 1, 3-4, 6-10, 12-14 and 20-28 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph, as failing to comply with the written description requirement. The claim(s) contains subject matter which was not described in the specification in such a way as to reasonably convey to one skilled in the relevant art that the inventor or a joint inventor, or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the inventor(s), at the time the application was filed, had possession of the claimed invention. Claims 1 and 10 have been amended to include the claims limitations “generating… a baseline contextual envelope based on one or more cohort driving characteristics and one or more cohort contextual characteristics from a spatiotemporally matched cohort corresponding to a driver”. The Examiner has reviewed the paragraphs identified by Applicant as containing support for the newly added amendments, in particular paragraph [0067] of Applicant’s specification. Though the cited paragraph provides an extremely generalized, high-level operation with respect to a vehicle/driver traveling along the same or similar path perhaps at or near the same time, it does not provide the claimed generation of a baseline contextual envelope based on one or more cohort driving characteristics and one or more cohort contextual characteristics from a spatiotemporally matched cohort corresponding to a driver. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to the above claim(s) have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to NAOMI J SMALL whose telephone number is (571)270-5184. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 8:30AM-5PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Quan-Zhen Wang can be reached at 571-272-3114. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /NAOMI J SMALL/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2685
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 3 earlier events
Sep 06, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Sep 11, 2025
Response Filed
Apr 08, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §112
Jun 08, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Jun 09, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jul 01, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Jul 21, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Jul 25, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12696064
SECURITY SYSTEM ENROLLMENT
1y 11m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12685468
DEVICES, METHODS, AND SYSTEMS FOR IDENTIFYING A DRUNKEN DRIVER
3y 2m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12679205
DETERMINING HORIZONTAL CLEARANCE FOR A VEHICLE
2y 7m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12679385
METHOD FOR CHECKING THE FITNESS OF A DRIVER TO DRIVE A MOTOR VEHICLE, AND MOTOR VEHICLE
2y 9m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12664885
Traffic Data Warehouse Construction Method and Apparatus, Storage Medium, and Terminal
1y 3m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
64%
Grant Probability
88%
With Interview (+23.9%)
2y 10m (~4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 789 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month