Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/583,788

BSR ENHANCEMENTS FOR XR APPLICATIONS

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Feb 21, 2024
Examiner
PASIA, REDENTOR M
Art Unit
2413
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Qualcomm Incorporated
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
79%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 3m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 79% — above average
79%
Career Allow Rate
530 granted / 668 resolved
+21.3% vs TC avg
Strong +24% interview lift
Without
With
+23.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 3m
Avg Prosecution
43 currently pending
Career history
711
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
5.5%
-34.5% vs TC avg
§103
53.9%
+13.9% vs TC avg
§102
20.1%
-19.9% vs TC avg
§112
11.8%
-28.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 668 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 05/06/2024 is considered by the examiner. The submission is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-30 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Lyu et al. (US 2025/0168697; hereinafter Lyu). Regarding claim 1, Lyu shows an apparatus (Figure 16 shows a terminal device performing in part the method of Figure 4.) for wireless communication at a user equipment (UE), comprising: a memory (Figure 16; memory); and at least one processor coupled to the memory and, based at least in part on information stored in the memory, the at least one processor is configured (Figure 16; noted computer program stored in memory and executed by the processor to perform the disclosed method.) to: receive, from a network entity, a buffer status table configuration (Figure 4; Par. 0051-0052; terminal device receives first information from network device.) indicating one or more buffer status report (BSR) tables (Figure 4; Par. 0058, 0061+; the first information indicates at least information related to a first BSR table.), wherein the one or more BSR tables are predefined at the UE or configurable by the UE based on the buffer status table configuration (Figure 4; Par. 0052, 0057; in some embodiments, a portion of the first information is sent by the network device to the terminal device, and another portion of the first information is predefined in the protocol.); and communicate with the network entity based on a first BSR table from the one or more BSR tables (Figure 4; Par. 0053-0054, 0058; the terminal device sends a first BSR to the network device based on the first information which indicates at least information related to a first BSR table.). Regarding claim 2, Lyu shows a transceiver coupled to the at least one processor (Figure 16 shows a transceiver coupled to the processor.). Regarding claim 3, Lyu shows wherein the buffer status table configuration indicates the one or more BSR tables from a defined set of BSR tables (Par. 0068-0069; the first BSR table can include a plurality of BSR tables. For example, the network device can configure K BSR tables for the terminal device, where k represents an integer greater than or equal to 1. After the K BSR tables are configured, the network device can activate K1 BSR tables, where K1 is less than or equal to K.). Regarding claim 4, Lyu shows wherein the buffer status table configuration configures at least one parameter for the one or more BSR tables (Par. 0061, 0070-0071; the information related to the first BSR table includes at least one of a parameter in the first BSR table.). Regarding claim 5, Lyu shows wherein the buffer status table configuration is comprised within radio resource control (RRC) signaling (claim 17; first information communicated using RRC signaling.) or system information (SI). Regarding claim 6, Lyu shows wherein the buffer status table configuration configures at least one of a minimum buffer size (Par. 0071; the parameter in the first BSR table includes at least a lower limit of the data volume.), a maximum buffer size (Par. 0071; the parameter in the first BSR table includes at least an upper limit of the data volume.), a step size factor (Par. 0071; the parameter in the first BSR table includes at least step sizes of the BSR code points.), or a type of step size for each of the one or more BSR tables (Par. 0071; the parameter in the first BSR table includes at least step sizes of the BSR code points.). Regarding claim 7, Lyu shows wherein the at least one processor is configured to: generate the one or more BSR tables based on parameters received in the buffer status table configuration (Par. 0058, 0370; the first BSR is generated based on first information.). Regarding claim 8, Lyu shows wherein the parameters received in the buffer status table configuration comprises an adjustment parameter (Figure 4; Par. 0061, 0071; the information related to the first BSR table includes at least one of a parameter in the first BSR table. The parameter in the first BSR table includes at least one of: an upper limit of the data volume, a lower limit of the data volume, a number of bits corresponding to the BSR code points (hereinafter referred to as a number of bits), and step sizes of the BSR code points.), wherein the one or more BSR tables is generated based on the adjustment parameter and a reference BSR table, wherein the reference BSR table is configurable or preconfigured (Par. 0334; The first BSR is determined based on a first BSR table, and the second BSR is determined based on a second BSR table. The second BSR table can be the table shown in Table 1. The first BSR table has corresponding relationships among BSR code points and the data volume different from corresponding relationships among BSR code points and the data volume in the second BSR table. The first BSR is referred to as the new BSR and the second BSR is referred to as the old BSR.). Regarding claim 9, Lyu shows wherein the buffer status table configuration indicates a set of BSR tables for the UE (Par. 0068-0069; the first BSR table can include a plurality of BSR tables. For example, the network device can configure K BSR tables for the terminal device, where k represents an integer greater than or equal to 1. After the K BSR tables are configured, the network device can activate K1 BSR tables, where K1 is less than or equal to K.), wherein the at least one processor is configured to: receive additional control signaling that indicates at least one BSR table from the set of BSR tables configured for the UE (Par. 0068-0069; The network device can configure a plurality of BSR tables for the terminal device. The plurality of BSR tables do not take effect immediately after configuration. The plurality of BSR tables are for the terminal device by the network device through the RRC message. In addition, the network device can send a second message to the terminal device. The second message is configured to activate or deactivate at least one BSR table of the plurality of BSR tables.). Regarding claim 10, Lyu shows wherein the buffer status table configuration indicates multiple BSR tables for the UE (Par. 0068-0069; the first BSR table can include a plurality of BSR tables. For example, the network device can configure K BSR tables for the terminal device, where k represents an integer greater than or equal to 1. After the K BSR tables are configured, the network device can activate K1 BSR tables, where K1 is less than or equal to K.), wherein the at least one processor is configured to: transmit an indication reporting a selected BSR table of the multiple BSR tables, wherein the selected BSR table comprises the first BSR table (Figure 4; Par. 0053-0054, 0058; the terminal device sends a first BSR to the network device based on the first information which indicates at least information related to a first BSR table.). Regarding claim 11, Lyu shows wherein to communicate with the network entity based on the first BSR table the at least one processor is configured to: transmit a BSR to the network entity using a codepoint corresponding to an amount of buffered data and an entry in the first BSR table (Par. 0071, 0076-0077; The parameter in the first BSR table includes at least one of: an upper limit of the data volume, a lower limit of the data volume, a number of bits corresponding to the BSR code points (hereinafter referred to as a number of bits), and step sizes of the BSR code points. The BSR code points can also be referred to as BSR index values. In a case that the data volume falls within the range from 10000 bytes to 10500 bytes, the BSR code point 0 is reported by the terminal device.). Regarding claim 12, Lyu shows wherein the one or more BSR tables (Par. 0071, 0076-0077; The parameter in the first BSR table includes at least one of: an upper limit of the data volume, a lower limit of the data volume, a number of bits corresponding to the BSR code points (hereinafter referred to as a number of bits), and step sizes of the BSR code points.) include at least one of: different minimum buffer sizes (Par. 0071; the parameter in the first BSR table includes at least a lower limit of the data volume.), different maximum buffer sizes (Par. 0071; the parameter in the first BSR table includes at least an upper limit of the data volume.), different step size factors (Par. 0071; the parameter in the first BSR table includes at least step sizes of the BSR code points.), or different types of step sizes (Par. 0071; the parameter in the first BSR table includes at least step sizes of the BSR code points.). Regarding claim 13, Lyu shows a method of wireless communication at a user equipment (UE) (Figure 16 shows a terminal device performing in part the method of Figure 4.), comprising: receiving, from a network entity, a buffer status table configuration (Figure 4; Par. 0051-0052; terminal device receives first information from network device.) indicating one or more buffer status report (BSR) tables (Figure 4; Par. 0058, 0061+; the first information indicates at least information related to a first BSR table.), wherein the one or more BSR tables are predefined at the UE or configurable by the UE based on the buffer status table configuration (Figure 4; Par. 0052, 0057; in some embodiments, a portion of the first information is sent by the network device to the terminal device, and another portion of the first information is predefined in the protocol.); and communicating with the network entity based on a first BSR table from the one or more BSR tables (Figure 4; Par. 0053-0054, 0058; the terminal device sends a first BSR to the network device based on the first information which indicates at least information related to a first BSR table.). Regarding claims 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 and 19, these claims are rejected based on the same reasoning as presented in the rejection of claims 4, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10, respectively. Regarding claim 20, Lyu shows an apparatus (Figure 16 shows a network device performing in part the method of Figure 4.) for wireless communication at a network entity, comprising: a memory (Figure 16; memory); and at least one processor coupled to the memory and, based at least in part on information stored in the memory (Figure 16; noted computer program stored in memory and executed by the processor to perform the disclosed method.), the at least one processor is configured to: provide, to a user equipment (UE), a buffer status table configuration (Figure 4; Par. 0051-0052; network device transmits first information to a terminal device.) indicating one or more buffer status report (BSR) tables (Figure 4; Par. 0058, 0061+; the first information indicates at least information related to a first BSR table.), wherein the one or more BSR tables are predefined at the UE or configurable by the UE based on the buffer status table configuration (Figure 4; Par. 0052, 0057; in some embodiments, a portion of the first information is sent by the network device to the terminal device, and another portion of the first information is predefined in the protocol.); and communicate with the UE based on a first BSR table from the one or more BSR tables (Figure 4; Par. 0053-0054, 0058; the network device receives a first BSR to the terminal device based on the first information which indicates at least information related to a first BSR table.). Regarding claim 21, Lyu shows a transceiver coupled to the at least one processor (Figure 16 shows a transceiver coupled to the processor.). Regarding claims 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28 and 29, these claims are rejected based on the same reasoning as presented in the rejection of claims 3, 4, 5, 6, 9, 10, 11 and 12, respectively. Regarding claim 30, Lyu shows a method (Figure 16 shows a network device performing in part the method of Figure 4.) of wireless communication at a network entity, comprising: providing, to a user equipment (UE), a buffer status table configuration (Figure 4; Par. 0051-0052; network device transmits first information to a terminal device.) indicating one or more buffer status report (BSR) tables (Figure 4; Par. 0058, 0061+; the first information indicates at least information related to a first BSR table.), wherein the one or more BSR tables are predefined at the UE or configurable by the UE based on the buffer status table configuration (Figure 4; Par. 0052, 0057; in some embodiments, a portion of the first information is sent by the network device to the terminal device, and another portion of the first information is predefined in the protocol.); and communicating with the UE based on a first BSR table from the one or more BSR tables (Figure 4; Par. 0053-0054, 0058; the network device receives a first BSR to the terminal device based on the first information which indicates at least information related to a first BSR table.). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. US 20250071606 A1 - A communication device in a network can receive a buffer status report (“BSR”) format configuration from a network node. US 20240357419 A1 - The information transmission method applied to a first communication node includes: receiving or determining a buffer size report related parameter used by a service to be transmitted; and reporting a buffer status report (BSR) based on the buffer size report related parameter. US 20240114385 A1 - In certain configurations, the UE establishes a connection supporting an extended reality (XR) application service with a base station. The UE reports, to the base station under a trigger condition, a buffer status report (BSR) to indicate a buffer size for data to be transmitted to the base station. The BSR includes information related to a corresponding BSR table. The UE receives a configuration instruction from the base station. The UE configures resources on the UE. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to REDENTOR M PASIA whose telephone number is (571)272-9745. The examiner can normally be reached M (6am-1:30pm EST), T, W Th, and F (6:00am-2:30pm). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Un Cho can be reached at (571)272-7919. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /REDENTOR PASIA/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2413
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 21, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 21, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12592852
Method, Apparatus, and System for Sending Packet and Receiving Packet to Perform OAM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12592867
METHOD FOR ESTABLISHING NETWORK CONNECTION AND APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12563504
FULL POWER TRANSMISSION SIGNALING FOR COHERENT USER EQUIPMENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12556330
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR ACQUIRING UPLINK CHANNEL STATE INFORMATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12537623
SIDELINK DATA TRANSMISSION METHOD AND TERMINAL DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 27, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
79%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+23.7%)
3y 3m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 668 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month