Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/583,927

MOBILE OBJECT SETTING DEVICE, MOBILE OBJECT SETTING METHOD, AND STORAGE MEDIUM

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Feb 22, 2024
Examiner
PECHE, JORGE O
Art Unit
3656
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Honda Motor Co. Ltd.
OA Round
2 (Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
3y 0m
To Grant
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 80% — above average
80%
Career Allow Rate
469 granted / 583 resolved
+28.4% vs TC avg
Strong +17% interview lift
Without
With
+17.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
28 currently pending
Career history
611
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
7.6%
-32.4% vs TC avg
§103
42.5%
+2.5% vs TC avg
§102
22.1%
-17.9% vs TC avg
§112
21.9%
-18.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 583 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Receipt is acknowledged of applicant’s argument/remarks filed on November 04, 2025, claims 1-6 are pending and an action on the merits is as follows. Applicant's arguments with respect to amended claims have been fully considered but are moot in view of a new ground(s) of rejection. Applicant has amended claims 1, 2, 5, 6 and added claims 7-9. Per amendment of the claims, the rejection of claim 6 under 35 U.S.C. 101 had been withdrawn. Response to Argument Regarding applicant arguments with respect to the amendment of claim 1, (page 8, par. 3 – page 9, par. 2), the argument is moot in view of a new ground of rejection. Applicant is kindly invited to view the rejection below to view the new ground of rejection, cited section and motivation to combine. Regarding applicant arguments with respect to the amendment of claim 2 (page 9, par. 3 – page 11, par. 1), the examiner respectfully disagreed with applicant allegation. First, the argument is moot in view of a new ground of rejection. Second, argument related to Hironori reference is moot because applicant had cited paragraph 53 related to setting vehicle equipment for unregistered user without considering the sections cited on the Office Action. Applicant is kindly invited to view the rejection below to view the new ground of rejection, cited section and motivation to combine. Regarding applicant arguments with respect to the new added claims 7-9, (page 11, par. 2 – 3), the argument is moot in view of a new ground of rejection. Applicant is kindly invited to view the rejection below to view the new ground of rejection, cited section and motivation to combine. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102 of this title, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-3 and 5-9 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Cockings et al. (Pub. No.: US 2020/0070758 A1) in view of Hironori et al. (JP 2017-052409 A – Machine Translation). Regarding claim 1, Cockings et al. disclose an apparatus for enabling storing of user input vehicle setting comprising a storage device (e.g., a memory 104 – par. 58) configured to store a program and setting information of an automatic adjustment function which is a function for automatically adjusting a state of the equipment (e.g., the memory configured to store (i) program instruction(s) (par. 59) and (ii) one or more user input vehicle setting (par. 58), such that the vehicle apparatus automatically adjust setting of the vehicle to setting previously selected by the user (par. 3 and 63) – for instance, adjust the position of the driver’s seat in readiness for the user entering the vehicle (par. 72 and 78)); and a hardware processor (e.g., electronic processor 103 – par. 59), wherein the hardware processor (e.g., electronic processor 103 – par. 59) manages the setting information in association with a user of the mobile object (e.g., vehicle 201 – par. 63 and Figure 2) by executing the program stored in the storage device (e.g., electronic processor 103 stores and retrieves data indicative of one or more vehicle setting of identified user(s) (par. 58, 72, 75, 77-78, 87) by executing program instruction(s) stored in the memory), registers user information about the user and the setting information of the equipment in the storage device (e.g., storing the user input vehicle setting associated with an identified user – par. 6, 13, 58, 78, 96), identifies the user of the mobile object (e.g., determining the identity of a first user (par. 58)), and acquires the setting information of the equipment associated with the identified user from the storage device (e.g., retrieving data indicative of one or more setting stored in the memory 104 associated with the user / primary electronic device - par. 72 ) to set the equipment based on the acquired setting information (e.g., providing the retrieved data to the vehicle system; for instance, seat system 207 adjusts the position of the seat in readiness for the user – par. 72 and 77). Cockings et al. disclose a mechanism / process for retrieving data indicative of one or more setting stored in the memory that is associated with a user (par. 72)), such that the vehicle apparatus automatically adjust setting of the vehicle to setting previously selected by the user (par. 3 and 63) – for instance, adjust the position of the driver’s seat in readiness for the user entering the vehicle (par. 72 and 78)) (limitation: which is the setting information of the equipment associated with first user information registered in advance and used in the previous operation of the automatic adjustment function). However, Cockings et al. failed to specifically disclose wherein the hardware processor acquires first setting information from the storage device and registers the acquired first setting information in association with second user information different from the first user information. However, Hironori et al. teach a vehicle setting device configured to allow a user (e.g., user C) to register setting for vehicle devices – for instance, seat position (par. 5 and 38) – using set button 140 and registration button(s) (141-143) (par. 26-27 and 30); wherein the user is allowed to partially duplicate previously registered vehicle setting of other user (e.g., user A) by first reading out the user A setting (using registration and set buttons) and second pressing the registration button (par. 27-28 and Figure 3). Figure 3 show a vehicle setting table 160 comprising users A, B and C having similar content of vehicle device setting (Figure 3 and par. 36-40). As Cockings et al. disclose an apparatus enable storing of a setting of the vehicle for the first user 211 (par. 27, 87, 96) in relation with one or more setting of the vehicle stored for the second user 212 (par. 78, 13 and 73) such that driver’s seat position is adjusted based on primary identifier of the first user and its stored setting of the vehicle (par. 72 ), it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention (AIA ) to modify the processor for storing user input vehicle setting, as taught by Cockings et al., such that the processor allows a new user to register setting for vehicle devices by partially duplicating previously registered vehicle setting of other user (e.g., user A) via registration and set buttons, in view of Hironori et al., with reasonable expectation of success, since doing so would have achieved the benefit of providing an unregistered user who has not registered vehicle settings with appropriate vehicle settings that are at least partially different from the initial vehicle settings (par. 5 and 6). Regarding claim 2, Cockings et al. disclose an apparatus for enabling storing of user input vehicle setting comprising a storage device (e.g., a memory 104 – par. 58) configured to store a program and setting information of the equipment (e.g., the memory configured to store (i) program instruction(s) (par. 59) and (ii) one or more user input vehicle setting (par. 58), such that the vehicle apparatus automatically adjust setting of the vehicle to setting previously selected by the user (par. 3 and 63) – for instance, adjust the position of the driver’s seat in readiness for the user entering the vehicle (par. 72 and 78)); and a hardware processor (e.g., electronic processor 103 – par. 59), wherein the hardware processor (e.g., electronic processor 103 – par. 59) manages the setting information in association with a user of the mobile object (e.g., vehicle 201 – par. 63 and Figure 2) by executing the program stored in the storage device (e.g., electronic processor 103 stores and retrieves data indicative of one or more vehicle setting of identified user(s) (par. 58, 72, 75, 77-78, 87) by executing program instruction(s) stored in the memory), registers user information about the user and the setting information of the equipment in the storage device (e.g., storing the user input vehicle setting associated with an identified user – par. 6, 13, 58, 78, 96 ), identifies the user of the mobile object (e.g., determining the identity of a first user (par. 58)), and acquires the setting information of the equipment associated with the identified user from the storage device (e.g., retrieving data indicative of one or more setting stored in the memory 104 associated with the user / primary electronic device - par. 72 ) to set the equipment based on the acquired setting information (e.g., providing the retrieved data to the vehicle system; for instance, seat system 207 adjusts the position of the seat in readiness for the user – par. 72 and 77). Cockings et al. disclose a mechanism / process for retrieving data indicative of one or more setting stored in the memory that is associated with a user (par. 72)), such that the vehicle apparatus automatically adjust setting of the vehicle to setting previously selected by the user (par. 3 and 63) – for instance, adjust the position of the driver’s seat in readiness for the user entering the vehicle (par. 72 and 78)) (limitation: which is the setting information of the equipment associated with first user information registered in advance). However, Cockings et al. failed to specifically disclose wherein the hardware processor acquires first setting information from the storage device, and registers setting information having the same content as the setting information associated with the first user information in association with the second user information when the second user information is newly registered. However, Hironori et al. teach a vehicle setting device configured to allow a user (e.g., user C) to register setting for vehicle devices – for instance, seat position (par. 5 and 38) – using set button 140 and registration button(s) (141-143) (par. 26-27 and 30); wherein the user is allowed to partially duplicate previously registered vehicle setting of other user (e.g., user A) by first reading out the user A setting (using registration and set buttons) and second pressing the registration button (par. 27-28 and Figure 3). Figure 3 show a vehicle setting table 160 comprising users A, B and C having similar content of vehicle device setting (Figure 3 and par. 36-40). As Cockings et al. disclose an apparatus enable storing of a setting of the vehicle for the first user 211 (par. 27, 87, 96) in relation with one or more setting of the vehicle stored for the second user 212 (par. 78, 13 and 73) such that driver’s seat position is adjusted based on primary identifier of the first user and its stored setting of the vehicle (par. 72 ), it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention (AIA ) to modify the processor for storing user input vehicle setting, as taught by Cockings et al., such that the processor allows a new user to register setting for vehicle devices by partially duplicating previously registered vehicle setting of other user (e.g., user A) via registration and set buttons, in view of Hironori et al., with reasonable expectation of success, since doing so would have achieved the benefit of providing an unregistered user who has not registered vehicle settings with appropriate vehicle settings that are at least partially different from the initial vehicle settings (par. 5 and 6). Regarding claim 3, Cockings et al. disclose an apparatus and method for enabling storing of user input vehicle setting, wherein the equipment is a seat provided in the mobile object (e.g., vehicle comprising seat – par. 63-64), wherein the setting information of the equipment is seat position setting information for setting a position of the seat (e.g., enabling automated movement of the driver's seat, to position the seat forwards and backwards, to raise, lower or to tilt the seat, and so on under the control of an ECU (par. 63) based on stored vehicle setting associated with the identified user – par. 6, 13, 58, 78. 96). However, Cockings et al. failed to specifically disclose wherein the hardware processor associates a copy of seat position setting information associated with the first user information with seat position setting information of the second user information. However, Hironori et al. teach a vehicle setting device configured to allow a user (e.g., user C) to register setting for vehicle devices – for instance, seat position (par. 5 and 38) – using set button 140 and registration button(s) (141-143) (par. 26-27 and 30); wherein the user is allowed to duplicate previously registered vehicle setting of other user (e.g., user A) by first reading out the user A setting (using registration and set buttons) and second pressing the registration button (par. 27-28 and Figure 3), which covers copying the seat position setting information associated with the first user information. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention (AIA ) to modify the processor for storing user input vehicle setting, as taught by Cockings et al., such that the processor allows a new user to register setting for vehicle devices by duplicating previously registered vehicle setting of other user (e.g., user A) via registration and set buttons, in view of Hironori et al., with reasonable expectation of success, since doing so would have achieved the benefit of providing an unregistered user who has not registered vehicle settings with appropriate vehicle settings that are at least partially different from the initial vehicle settings (par. 5 and 6). Regarding claim 5, Cockings et al. disclose a method for enabling storing of user input vehicle setting comprising: managing, by a setting device (e.g., electronic processor 103 – par. 59) for setting equipment provided in a mobile object (e.g., vehicle 201 – par. 63 and Figure 2), setting information of an automatic adjustment function which is a function for automatically adjusting a state of the equipment (e.g., vehicle automatically adjusts setting of the vehicle to setting previously selected by the user (par. 3 and 63) – for instance, adjust the position of the driver’s seat in readiness for the user entering the vehicle (par. 72 and 78)) in association with a user of the mobile object in a storage device configured to store the setting information (e.g., electronic processor 103 stores and retrieves data from a memory 104 indicative of one or more vehicle setting of identified user(s) (par. 58, 72, 75, 77-78, 87); registering, by the setting device e.g., electronic processor 103 – par. 59), user information about the user and the setting information of the equipment in the storage device (e.g., storing the user input vehicle setting associated with an identified user – par. 6, 13, 58, 78, 96 ); identifying, by the setting device (e.g., electronic processor 103 – par. 59), the user of the mobile object (e.g., determining the identity of a first user (par. 58)); acquiring, by the setting device (e.g., electronic processor 103 – par. 59), the setting information of the equipment associated with the identified user from the storage device (e.g., retrieving data indicative of one or more setting stored in the memory 104 associated with the user / primary electronic device - par. 72 ) to set the equipment based on the acquired setting information (e.g., providing the retrieved data to the vehicle system; for instance, seat system 207 adjusts the position of the seat in readiness for the user – par. 72 and 77). Cockings et al. disclose a mechanism / process for retrieving data indicative of one or more setting stored in the memory that is associated with a user (par. 72)), such that the vehicle apparatus automatically adjust setting of the vehicle to setting previously selected by the user (par. 3 and 63) – for instance, adjust the position of the driver’s seat in readiness for the user entering the vehicle (par. 72 and 78)) (limitation: which is the setting information of the equipment associated with first user information registered in advance and used in the previous operation of the automatic adjustment function). However, Cockings et al. failed to specifically disclose wherein acquiring, by the setting device, first setting information from the storage device in the registration of the setting information and registering the acquired first setting information in association with second user information different from the first user information. However, Hironori et al. teach a vehicle setting device configured to allow a user (e.g., user C) to register setting for vehicle devices – for instance, seat position (par. 5 and 38) – using set button 140 and registration button(s) (141-143) (par. 26-27 and 30); wherein the user is allowed to partially duplicate previously registered vehicle setting of other user (e.g., user A) by first reading out the user A setting (using registration and set buttons) and second pressing the registration button (par. 27-28 and Figure 3). Figure 3 show a vehicle setting table 160 comprising users A, B and C having similar content of vehicle device setting (Figure 3 and par. 36-40). As Cockings et al. disclose an apparatus enable storing of a setting of the vehicle for the first user 211 (par. 27, 87, 96) in relation with one or more setting of the vehicle stored for the second user 212 (par. 78, 13 and 73) such that driver’s seat position is adjusted based on primary identifier of the first user and its stored setting of the vehicle (par. 72 ), it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention (AIA ) to modify the processor for storing user input vehicle setting, as taught by Cockings et al., such that the processor allows a new user to register setting for vehicle devices by partially duplicating previously registered vehicle setting of other user (e.g., user A) via registration and set buttons, in view of Hironori et al., with reasonable expectation of success, since doing so would have achieved the benefit of providing an unregistered user who has not registered vehicle settings with appropriate vehicle settings that are at least partially different from the initial vehicle settings (par. 5 and 6). Regarding claim 6, Cockings et al. disclose a memory device 104 for storing program instructions to be executed by a processor (par. 59) for a vehicle 201(par. 63 and Figure 2) to: manage setting information of an automatic adjustment function which is a function for automatically adjusting a state of the equipment (e.g., vehicle automatically adjusts setting of the vehicle to setting previously selected by the user (par. 3 and 63) – for instance, adjust the position of the driver’s seat in readiness for the user entering the vehicle (par. 72 and 78)) in association with a user of the mobile object in a storage device configured to store the setting information (e.g., electronic processor 103 stores and retrieves data from a memory 104 indicative of one or more vehicle setting of identified user(s) (par. 58, 72, 75, 77-78, 87); register user information about the user and the setting information of the equipment in the storage device (e.g., storing the user input vehicle setting associated with an identified user – par. 6, 13, 58, 78, 96 ); identify the user of the mobile object (e.g., determining the identity of a first user (par. 58)); acquiring the setting information of the equipment associated with the identified user from the storage device (e.g., retrieving data indicative of one or more setting stored in the memory 104 associated with the user / primary electronic device - par. 72 ) to set the equipment based on the acquired setting information (e.g., providing the retrieved data to the vehicle system; for instance, seat system 207 adjusts the position of the seat in readiness for the user – par. 72 and 77). Cockings et al. disclose a mechanism / process for retrieving data indicative of one or more setting stored in the memory that is associated with a user (par. 72)), such that the vehicle apparatus automatically adjust setting of the vehicle to setting previously selected by the user (par. 3 and 63) – for instance, adjust the position of the driver’s seat in readiness for the user entering the vehicle (par. 72 and 78)) (limitation: which is the setting information of the equipment associated with first user information registered in advance and used in the previous operation of the automatic adjustment function). However, Cockings et al. failed to specifically disclose wherein the setting device is caused to acquire first setting information from the storage device in the registration of the setting information and register the acquired first setting information in association with second user information different from the first user information. However, Hironori et al. teach a vehicle setting device configured to allow a user (e.g., user C) to register setting for vehicle devices – for instance, seat position (par. 5 and 38) – using set button 140 and registration button(s) (141-143) (par. 26-27 and 30); wherein the user is allowed to partially duplicate previously registered vehicle setting of other user (e.g., user A) by first reading out the user A setting (using registration and set buttons) and second pressing the registration button (par. 27-28 and Figure 3). Figure 3 show a vehicle setting table 160 comprising users A, B and C having similar content of vehicle device setting (Figure 3 and par. 36-40). As Cockings et al. disclose an apparatus enable storing of a setting of the vehicle for the first user 211 (par. 27, 87, 96) in relation with one or more setting of the vehicle stored for the second user 212 (par. 78, 13 and 73) such that driver’s seat position is adjusted based on primary identifier of the first user and its stored setting of the vehicle (par. 72 ), it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention (AIA ) to modify the processor for storing user input vehicle setting, as taught by Cockings et al., such that the processor allows a new user to register setting for vehicle devices by partially duplicating previously registered vehicle setting of other user (e.g., user A) via registration and set buttons, in view of Hironori et al., with reasonable expectation of success, since doing so would have achieved the benefit of providing an unregistered user who has not registered vehicle settings with appropriate vehicle settings that are at least partially different from the initial vehicle settings (par. 5 and 6). Regarding claim 7, Cockings et al. disclose an apparatus and method for enabling storing of user input vehicle setting, wherein the equipment is a seat provided in the mobile object (e.g., vehicle comprising seat – par. 63-64), wherein the setting information of the equipment is seat position setting information for setting a position of the seat (e.g., enabling automated movement of the driver's seat, to position the seat forwards and backwards, to raise, lower or to tilt the seat, and so on under the control of an ECU (par. 63) based on stored vehicle setting associated with the identified user – par. 6, 13, 58, 78. 96). However, Cockings et al. failed to specifically disclose wherein the hardware processor associates a copy of seat position setting information associated with the first user information with seat position setting information of the second user information. However, Hironori et al. teach a vehicle setting device configured to allow a user (e.g., user C) to register setting for vehicle devices – for instance, seat position (par. 5 and 38) – using set button 140 and registration button(s) (141-143) (par. 26-27 and 30); wherein the user is allowed to duplicate previously registered vehicle setting of other user (e.g., user A) by first reading out the user A setting (using registration and set buttons) and second pressing the registration button (par. 27-28 and Figure 3), which covers copying the seat position setting information associated with the first user information. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention (AIA ) to modify the processor for storing user input vehicle setting, as taught by Cockings et al., such that the processor allows a new user to register setting for vehicle devices by duplicating previously registered vehicle setting of other user (e.g., user A) via registration and set buttons, in view of Hironori et al., with reasonable expectation of success, since doing so would have achieved the benefit of providing an unregistered user who has not registered vehicle settings with appropriate vehicle settings that are at least partially different from the initial vehicle settings (par. 5 and 6). Regarding claim 8, Cockings et al. disclose a method for enabling storing of user input vehicle setting comprising: managing, by a setting device (e.g., electronic processor 103 – par. 59) for setting equipment provided in a mobile object (e.g., vehicle 201 – par. 63 and Figure 2), setting information of the equipment (e.g., vehicle automatically adjusts setting of the vehicle to setting previously selected by the user (par. 3 and 63) – for instance, adjust the position of the driver’s seat in readiness for the user entering the vehicle (par. 72 and 78)) in association with a user of the mobile object in a storage device configured to store the setting information (e.g., electronic processor 103 stores and retrieves data from a memory 104 indicative of one or more vehicle setting of identified user(s) (par. 58, 72, 75, 77-78, 87); registering, by the setting device e.g., electronic processor 103 – par. 59), user information about the user and the setting information of the equipment in the storage device (e.g., storing the user input vehicle setting associated with an identified user – par. 6, 13, 58, 78, 96 ); identifying, by the setting device (e.g., electronic processor 103 – par. 59), the user of the mobile object (e.g., determining the identity of a first user (par. 58)); acquiring, by the setting device (e.g., electronic processor 103 – par. 59), the setting information of the equipment associated with the identified user from the storage device (e.g., retrieving data indicative of one or more setting stored in the memory 104 associated with the user / primary electronic device - par. 72 ) to set the equipment based on the acquired setting information (e.g., providing the retrieved data to the vehicle system; for instance, seat system 207 adjusts the position of the seat in readiness for the user – par. 72 and 77). Cockings et al. disclose a mechanism / process for retrieving data indicative of one or more setting stored in the memory that is associated with a user (par. 72)), such that the vehicle apparatus automatically adjust setting of the vehicle to setting previously selected by the user (par. 3 and 63) – for instance, adjust the position of the driver’s seat in readiness for the user entering the vehicle (par. 72 and 78)) (limitation: which is the setting information of the equipment associated with first user information registered in advance). However, Cockings et al. failed to specifically disclose wherein acquiring, by the setting device, first setting information from the storage device, and registering setting information having the same content as the first user information in association with the second user information when the second user information is newly registered. However, Hironori et al. teach a vehicle setting device configured to allow a user (e.g., user C) to register setting for vehicle devices – for instance, seat position (par. 5 and 38) – using set button 140 and registration button(s) (141-143) (par. 26-27 and 30); wherein the user is allowed to partially duplicate previously registered vehicle setting of other user (e.g., user A) by first reading out the user A setting (using registration and set buttons) and second pressing the registration button (par. 27-28 and Figure 3). Figure 3 show a vehicle setting table 160 comprising users A, B and C having similar content of vehicle device setting (Figure 3 and par. 36-40). As Cockings et al. disclose an apparatus enable storing of a setting of the vehicle for the first user 211 (par. 27, 87, 96) in relation with one or more setting of the vehicle stored for the second user 212 (par. 78, 13 and 73) such that driver’s seat position is adjusted based on primary identifier of the first user and its stored setting of the vehicle (par. 72 ), it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention (AIA ) to modify the processor for storing user input vehicle setting, as taught by Cockings et al., such that the processor allows a new user to register setting for vehicle devices by partially duplicating previously registered vehicle setting of other user (e.g., user A) via registration and set buttons, in view of Hironori et al., with reasonable expectation of success, since doing so would have achieved the benefit of providing an unregistered user who has not registered vehicle settings with appropriate vehicle settings that are at least partially different from the initial vehicle settings (par. 5 and 6). Regarding claim 9, Cockings et al. disclose a memory device 104 for storing program instructions to be executed by a processor (par. 59) for a vehicle 201(par. 63 and Figure 2) to: manage setting information of the equipment (e.g., vehicle automatically adjusts setting of the vehicle to setting previously selected by the user (par. 3 and 63) – for instance, adjust the position of the driver’s seat in readiness for the user entering the vehicle (par. 72 and 78)) in association with a user of the mobile object in a storage device configured to store the setting information (e.g., electronic processor 103 stores and retrieves data from a memory 104 indicative of one or more vehicle setting of identified user(s) (par. 58, 72, 75, 77-78, 87); register user information about the user and the setting information of the equipment in the storage device (e.g., storing the user input vehicle setting associated with an identified user – par. 6, 13, 58, 78, 96 ); identify the user of the mobile object (e.g., determining the identity of a first user (par. 58)); acquiring the setting information of the equipment associated with the identified user from the storage device (e.g., retrieving data indicative of one or more setting stored in the memory 104 associated with the user / primary electronic device - par. 72 ) to set the equipment based on the acquired setting information (e.g., providing the retrieved data to the vehicle system; for instance, seat system 207 adjusts the position of the seat in readiness for the user – par. 72 and 77). Cockings et al. disclose a mechanism / process for retrieving data indicative of one or more setting stored in the memory that is associated with a user (par. 72)), such that the vehicle apparatus automatically adjust setting of the vehicle to setting previously selected by the user (par. 3 and 63) – for instance, adjust the position of the driver’s seat in readiness for the user entering the vehicle (par. 72 and 78)) (limitation: which is the setting information of the equipment associated with first user information registered in advance). However, Cockings et al. failed to specifically disclose wherein the setting device is caused to acquire first setting information, from the storage device, and register setting information having the same content as the first user information in association with the second user information when the second user information is newly registered. However, Hironori et al. teach a vehicle setting device configured to allow a user (e.g., user C) to register setting for vehicle devices – for instance, seat position (par. 5 and 38) – using set button 140 and registration button(s) (141-143) (par. 26-27 and 30); wherein the user is allowed to partially duplicate previously registered vehicle setting of other user (e.g., user A) by first reading out the user A setting (using registration and set buttons) and second pressing the registration button (par. 27-28 and Figure 3). Figure 3 show a vehicle setting table 160 comprising users A, B and C having similar content of vehicle device setting (Figure 3 and par. 36-40). As Cockings et al. disclose an apparatus enable storing of a setting of the vehicle for the first user 211 (par. 27, 87, 96) in relation with one or more setting of the vehicle stored for the second user 212 (par. 78, 13 and 73) such that driver’s seat position is adjusted based on primary identifier of the first user and its stored setting of the vehicle (par. 72 ), it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention (AIA ) to modify the processor for storing user input vehicle setting, as taught by Cockings et al., such that the processor allows a new user to register setting for vehicle devices by partially duplicating previously registered vehicle setting of other user (e.g., user A) via registration and set buttons, in view of Hironori et al., with reasonable expectation of success, since doing so would have achieved the benefit of providing an unregistered user who has not registered vehicle settings with appropriate vehicle settings that are at least partially different from the initial vehicle settings (par. 5 and 6). Allowable Subject Matter Claim 4 is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure: Lee (US 2018/0162320 A1) is directed to a vehicle configured to record seating position of various components of a vehicle seat associated with a multiple driver. Pinkelman et al. (US 2018/0345889 A1) is directed to a smart vehicle accommodation device configured to automatically adjust a position of a seat based on user preferences. THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any extension fee pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Jorge O. Peche whose telephone number is (571)270-1339. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 8:30 AM - 5:30 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Khoi H. Tran can be reached at 571 272 6919. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /J.O.P/ Examiner, Art Unit 3656 /KHOI H TRAN/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3656
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 22, 2024
Application Filed
Aug 02, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Nov 04, 2025
Response Filed
Jan 21, 2026
Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12592158
System for Using a Space Integration Sequencer System
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12583444
PARKING SUPPORT METHOD, PARKING SUPPORT APPARATUS, AND COMPUTER-READABLE RECORDING MEDIUM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12570255
VEHICLE AND A METHOD FOR CONTROLLING THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12565231
AUTONOMOUS DRIVING CONTROL APPARATUS AND METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12555484
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DIMINISHING VEHICLE CONTRAILS
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+17.0%)
3y 0m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 583 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month