Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 18, 2026
Application No. 18/584,109

Tag Identification System

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Feb 22, 2024
Examiner
KIM, SHIN H
Art Unit
3636
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Bob Barker Company Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
64%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 2m
To Grant
76%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 64% of resolved cases
64%
Career Allow Rate
735 granted / 1149 resolved
+12.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+11.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 2m
Avg Prosecution
35 currently pending
Career history
1184
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
54.2%
+14.2% vs TC avg
§102
28.4%
-11.6% vs TC avg
§112
9.7%
-30.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1149 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Claim 11-19 withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b), as being drawn to a nonelected group 2 for washable objects, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Applicant timely traversed the restriction (election) requirement in the reply filed on September 25, 2025. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-10 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Andrea Felicioni et al. U.S. patent Publication 2019/0325787 A1 (Felicioni) in view of Sidney M. Weiss in view of Sidney M. Weiss U.S. Patent 4,473,373 (Weiss). Regarding claims 1 and 7, Felicioni discloses a method of identifying identical washable objects, each of the objects comprises an identical tag that includes zones that are each the same shape and size and with each of the zones being a different color ([0002]). Felicioni does not directly disclose the method of selecting a washable object. Weiss discloses the method comprising: individually selecting each of the washable objects; for each of the washable objects, drawing a mark in a different one of the zones; placing the washable objects that include the marks in a washing machine and washing the washable objects; and removing the washable objects from the washing machine and identifying each of the washable objects based on the zone where the mark is located (Column 4 Lines 5-60); method of identifying identical washable objects, each of the objects comprises an identical tag that is divided into zones, the method comprising: placing a mark on a different zone of each of the washable objects; placing each of the washable objects that are marked in the washing machine and washing the washable objects; and removing the washable objects from the washing machine and identifying each of the washable objects based on the zone where the mark is located. Therefore it would have been an obvious modification well known in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention with reasonable expectations of the success to modify Felicioni as taught by Weiss to include Weiss’ method of sorting laundry. Such a modification would provide a means to organize and sort objects for washing. Regarding claim 2, Felicioni in view of Weiss discloses the method further comprising drawing the marks completely within one of the zones (zone shown Figure 1-4, Felicioni labeled section). Regarding claim 3, Felicioni in view of Weiss discloses the method further comprising drawing two or more of the marks on at least one of the washable objects ([0048], Felicioni). Regarding claims 4 and 9, Felicioni in view of Weiss discloses the method further comprising attaching tags that include the zones to each of the washable objects ([0035-0038], Felicioni). Regarding claims 5 and 8, Felicioni in view of Weiss discloses the method wherein each of the zones is a different color and drawing the mark in the different one of the zones comprises drawing the mark on just a single one of the different colors ([0029, 0032, 0046], Felicioni). Regarding claims 6 and 10, Felicioni in view of Weiss discloses the method wherein the washable objects are laundry bags, the method further comprising: placing clothes which each of the washable objects; washing the clothes and the washable objects together in the washing machine; and after washing, removing the clothes from each of the washable objects (Column 3 Line 55-Column 4 Line 60). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SHIN H KIM whose telephone number is (571)272-7788. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 9AM-6PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, David Dunn can be reached at 571-272-6670. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SHIN H KIM/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3636
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 22, 2024
Application Filed
Nov 26, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Mar 02, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Mar 02, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Mar 26, 2026
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12600276
INDEPENDANT AIR CONDITIONING SEAT FOR VEHICLES
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12597370
Flag Label
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12594866
VEHICLE USER SUPPORT INCLUDING UPPER HOOD MODULE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12583373
VEHICLE HEADREST
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12579916
POPUP VIDEO DISPLAY SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
64%
Grant Probability
76%
With Interview (+11.6%)
2y 2m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1149 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month