Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/584,110

SOLID-STATE CIRCUIT BREAKER

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Feb 22, 2024
Examiner
JIMENEZ, ANTHONY R
Art Unit
2831
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Schneider Electric
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
88%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 4m
To Grant
95%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 88% — above average
88%
Career Allow Rate
950 granted / 1077 resolved
+20.2% vs TC avg
Moderate +7% lift
Without
With
+7.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
27 currently pending
Career history
1104
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
41.8%
+1.8% vs TC avg
§102
27.9%
-12.1% vs TC avg
§112
27.7%
-12.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1077 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claims 1-10 are pending in the current application. Claim Objections Regarding Claim 1, the 6th to the last line, and Claim 5, the 3rd to the last line, the language “the other” should be changed to “an other” or similar language. Regarding Claim 5, line 4, the language “the outer” should be changed to “an outer” or similar language. Regarding Claim 7, line 5, the language “the outer” should be changed to “an outer” or similar language. Regarding Claim 7, the 3rd to the last line, the language “the other” should be changed to “an other” or similar language. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim 1 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Schneider Electric (French Pat. No. FR 3123142 A1, hereinafter “Schneider”) in view of Zhejiang Zhongyihao Technology Co Ltd. (Chinese Pat. No. CN 113130268 A, hereinafter “Zhejiang”). Specifically, regarding Claim 1, Schneider discloses a solid-state circuit breaker (¶ [0046]) comprising: a mounting side plate (4), an operating handle (14) disposed on the mounting side plate (4; all elements of the circuit breaker are shown mounted on the side wall of the plate 4; FIG. 1) and being rotatable relative to the mounting side plate (4) to switch between a closing state and an opening state (¶¶ [0095], [0097]), a mechanical switch (10; FIG. 2) connected to the operating handle (14), wherein in a case that the operating handle (14) is rotated by a first angle from the closing state along a rotation direction of the operating handle (14) switched from the closing state to the opening state (¶¶ [0078], [0095], [0097]), the operating handle (14) drives the mechanical switch (10) to open (¶ [0095]), an actuating assembly (12) disposed on the mounting side plate (4; FIG. 1), wherein an end of the actuating assembly (12) abuts against the operating handle (14; FIGS. 1 and 2), and the actuating assembly (12) is rotatable relative to the mounting side plate (4) under driving of the operating handle (14; FIG. 1, ¶¶ [0095], [0097]), and wherein in a case that the operating handle (14) is rotated by a second angle from the closing state along the rotation direction of the operating handle (14) switched from the closing state to the opening state (FIG. 1), the operating handle (14) drives the actuating assembly (12) to rotate (¶¶ [0038, [0076]), the first angle is greater than the second angle (¶¶ [0076]-[0080]). Thus, as discussed at, e.g., ¶¶ [0078]-[0080], during rotation of the handle 14 to open the mechanical contacts 10, the mechanical sensor 34 is first triggered by the actuating assembly 12 when the handle 14 is in a first angular position and the mechanical contacts 10 are then opened when the handle 14 reaches a further angular position, the latter angle being larger than the former angle. Schneider does not disclose the claimed microswitch. However, Zhejiang discloses a microswitch (35; FIG. 2, p. 2, the last complete paragraph of the attached machine translation), triggered by an actuating assembly (20, 21, 23), abutting against [an] other end of the actuating assembly (20, 21, 23) away from the operating handle (20; FIG. 2). Thus, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine the teachings of Zhejiang with those of Schneider to effectively reduce device cost and realize a flexible selection of modularization. Claims 2, 3, and 6, are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over the combination of Schneider and Zhejiang in view of Domenico (European Pat. No. EP 1487002 A2, hereinafter “Domenico”). The combination of Schneider and Zhejiang discloses substantially all of the limitations of the present invention but does not disclose the claimed part and cam. However, Domenico discloses that the (i) actuating assembly (15, 16, 19) comprises a linkage part (42) and a cam (16) disposed at an end of the linkage part (42) near the microswitch (121; FIG. 22), the linkage part (42) abuts against the operating handle (20), and the cam (16) abuts against the microswitch (at 21; FIG. 22), as recited in Claim 2, (ii) solid-state circuit breaker further comprises a rotating shaft (54), and the linkage part (42) and the cam (16) are rotatably connected to the mounting side plate (a side wall of 2) through the rotating shaft (54; FIG. 3), as recited in Claim 3, and (iii) that the linkage part (42) comprises a linkage rod (42 itself) comprising a first side (an end portion of 42 adjacent 20; FIG. 20) and a second side (an end portion of 42 adjacent 16; FIG. 20) disposed opposite to each other (FIG. 20), an abutting portion (a circumferential end of 42) is disposed on the first side (FIG. 20), the abutting portion abuts against the operating handle (20; FIG. 20), the cam (16) is disposed at an end of the linkage rod near the microswitch (121) and is located on the second side (FIG. 20), as recited in Claim 6. Thus, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine the teachings of Domenico with those of Schneider to provide a compact and reliable remote actuation device with sufficient speed. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 4, 5, and 7-10, are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The prior art fails to teach, disclose, or suggest, either alone or in combination, a solid-state circuit breaker comprising the claimed cam disposed at an end of a first linkage rod of a pair of linkage rods close to a microswitch and is located on a side of the first linkage rod away from a second linkage rod of the pair of linkage rods, as recited in Claim 4, and (ii) that the cam comprises a first arc surface, a second arc surface and a pair of transition surfaces, and a diameter of the first arc surface is greater than a diameter of the second arc surface, as recited in Claim 8. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ANTHONY R. JIMENEZ whose telephone number is 313-446-6518. The examiner can normally be reached Monday through Thursday, 1030am - 9pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, Applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Renee Luebke, can be reached at (571) 272-2009. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ANTHONY R JIMENEZ/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2833
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 22, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 02, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Apr 07, 2026
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12599529
FOOT CONTROLLER FOR DENTAL UNIT CHAIR
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12603235
SWITCH ASSEMBLY COMPRISING AN ON-LOAD TAP CHANGER AND A DRIVE SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12603236
KEY STRUCTURE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12603241
CIRCUIT BREAKER AND OPERATING MECHANISM THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12586739
HYBRID CIRCUIT BREAKER WITH IMPROVED CURRENT CAPACITY PER DEVICE SIZE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
88%
Grant Probability
95%
With Interview (+7.0%)
2y 4m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1077 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month