Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 15, 2026
Application No. 18/584,666

HIGH CURRENT DISCONNECT MODULE

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Feb 22, 2024
Priority
Jan 26, 2024 — CIP of 18/424,129
Examiner
ROJAS, BERNARD
Art Unit
2837
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Littelfuse Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
83%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1m
Est. Remaining
91%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 83% — above average
83%
Career Allowance Rate
1083 granted / 1304 resolved
+15.1% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+7.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
37 currently pending
Career history
1335
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
66.6%
+26.6% vs TC avg
§102
22.4%
-17.6% vs TC avg
§112
9.0%
-31.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1304 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statements (IDS) submitted on 06/21/2024 and 09/23/2025 are in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Drawings The drawings are objected to as failing to comply with 37 CFR 1.84(p)(5) because they include the following reference character(s) not mentioned in the description: 118 (figures 1 and 2) and 108c(figures 4A and 4B). Corrected drawing sheets in compliance with 37 CFR 1.121(d), or amendment to the specification to add the reference character(s) in the description in compliance with 37 CFR 1.121(b) are required in reply to the Office action to avoid abandonment of the application. Any amended replacement drawing sheet should include all of the figures appearing on the immediate prior version of the sheet, even if only one figure is being amended. Each drawing sheet submitted after the filing date of an application must be labeled in the top margin as either “Replacement Sheet” or “New Sheet” pursuant to 37 CFR 1.121(d). If the changes are not accepted by the examiner, the applicant will be notified and informed of any required corrective action in the next Office action. The objection to the drawings will not be held in abeyance. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-5, 7, 9-13 and 15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Ball [US 2023/0245836]. Claim 1, Ball discloses a fused disconnect switch [200], comprising: a fuse carrier [20/306] to house a fuse [paragraph 0112]; an actuator [12] configured to reversibly engage and disengage with the fuse carrier; a common trip link [50], mechanically coupled to move in concert with the actuator [paragraph 0088]; and a contact arm [26], indirectly mechanically coupled to the common trip link, wherein, when the fuse carrier is disposed in an engaged position, the contact arm is free to move into a closed position to make electrical contact with a fixed contact [28; paragraph 0093], and wherein, when the fuse carrier is in a disengage position, the contact arm is prevented from moving into the closed position [paragraph 0093]. Claim 2, Ball discloses the fused disconnect switch of claim 1, wherein, when the fuse carrier is moved out of the engaged position while the contact arm is in contact with the fixed contact, the actuator is configured to trigger the common trip link to disconnect the contact arm from the fixed contact [paragraph 0093]. Claim 3, Ball discloses the fused disconnect switch of claim 1, wherein the actuator [12] comprises a first arm [64] to engage a surface of the fuse carrier [paragraph 0091], and further comprises a second arm 60] that is biased [via spring 60] against the common trip link [50]. Claim 4, Ball discloses the fused disconnect switch of claim 3, further comprising an escapement assembly [38], coupled between the common trip link [50] and the contact arm [26; figure 2], wherein the escapement assembly is held in an open position when the fuse carrier is in the disengage position [, actuator 12 prevents rotation of switch 34 which contains common trip link 38; paragraph 0093]. Claim 5, Ball discloses the fused disconnect switch of claim 4, wherein the common trip link [50; figure 4] comprises an upper arm [58] to engage the second arm [60] of the actuator [12], and wherein the common trip link comprises a lower arm [56] to engage the escapement assembly [38]. Claim 7, Ball discloses the fused disconnect switch of claim 1, further comprising: a housing [figure 8dc, housing of module 204], arranged to enclose the fuse when the fuse carrier is disposed in the engaged position [figure 8c]; and a reset handle [34/242], extending externally to the housing [figures 3 and 8c], wherein the contact arm is prevented from moving to the closed position when the reset handle is moved from an open to closed position, when the fuse carrier is in a disengage position [paragraph 0093]. Claim 9, Ball discloses a disconnect module [200], comprising: a relay module [202]; and a fused disconnect switch [200], coupled to the relay module [paragraphs 0101-0102], comprising: a fuse carrier [20/306] to house a fuse [paragraph 0112]; an actuator [12] configured to reversibly engage and disengage with the fuse carrier; a common trip link [50], mechanically coupled to move in concert with the actuator [paragraph 0088]; and a contact arm [26], indirectly mechanically coupled to the common trip link, wherein, when the fuse carrier is disposed in an engaged position, the contact arm is free to move into a closed position to make electrical contact with a fixed contact [28; paragraph 0093], and wherein, when the fuse carrier is in a disengage position, the contact arm is prevented from moving into the closed position [paragraph 0093]. Claim 10, Ball discloses the disconnect module of claim 9, wherein, when the fuse carrier is moved out of the engaged position while the contact arm is in contact with the fixed contact, the actuator is configured to trigger the common trip link to disconnect the contact arm from the fixed contact [paragraph 0093]. Claim 11, Ball discloses the disconnect module of claim 9, wherein the actuator [12] comprises a first arm [64] to engage a surface of the fuse carrier [paragraph 0091], and further comprises a second arm 60] that is biased [via spring 60] against the common trip link [50]. Claim 12, Ball discloses the disconnect module of claim 11, further comprising an escapement assembly [38], coupled between the common trip link [50] and the contact arm [26; figure 2], wherein the escapement assembly is held in an open position when the fuse carrier is in the disengage position [, actuator 12 prevents rotation of switch 34 which contains common trip link 38; paragraph 0093]. Claim 13, Ball discloses the disconnect module of claim 12, wherein the common trip link [50; figure 4] comprises an upper arm [58] to engage the second arm [60] of the actuator [12], and wherein the common trip link comprises a lower arm [56] to engage the escapement assembly [38]. Claim 15, Ball discloses the disconnect module of claim 9, further comprising: a housing [figure 8dc, housing of module 204], arranged to enclose the fuse when the fuse carrier is disposed in the engaged position [figure 8c]; and a reset handle [34/242], extending externally to the housing [figures 3 and 8c], wherein the contact arm is prevented from moving to the closed position when the reset handle is moved from an open to closed position, when the fuse carrier is in a disengage position [paragraph 0093]. Claims 1-4, 6, 7, 9-12, 14 and 15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Myers [US 3,474,373]. Claim 1, Myers discloses a fused disconnect switch [figure 1], for overcurrent protection, comprising: a fuse carrier [190] to house a fuse [50]; an actuator [194] configured to reversibly engage and disengage with the fuse carrier; a common trip link [140], mechanically coupled to move in concert with the actuator; and a contact arm [106], indirectly mechanically coupled to the common trip link, wherein, when the fuse carrier is disposed in an engaged position, the contact arm is free to move into a closed position to make electrical contact with a fixed contact [102], and wherein, when the fuse carrier is in a disengage position, the contact arm is prevented from moving into the closed position [col. 5 line 65 to col. 6 line 9]. Claim 2, Myers discloses the fused disconnect switch of claim 1, wherein, when the fuse carrier [190] is moved out of the engaged position while the contact arm [106] is in contact with the fixed contact [102], the actuator is configured to trigger the common trip link to disconnect the contact arm from the fixed contact [col. 6 lines 16-21]. Claim 3, Myers discloses the fused disconnect switch of claim 1, wherein the actuator [194; figure 12] comprises a first arm [202] to engage a surface of the fuse carrier [col. 5 lines 50-54], and further comprises a second arm [201] that is biased [via 198] against the common trip link. Claim 4, Myers discloses the fused disconnect switch of claim 3, further comprising an escapement assembly [140], coupled between the common trip link [194] and the contact arm, wherein the escapement assembly is held in an open position when the fuse carrier is in the disengage position [col. 6 lines 16-21]. Claim 6, Myers discloses the fused disconnect switch of claim 4, further comprising a shunt trip coil [130], and an armature [166], wherein the shunt trip coil is arranged to receive an external voltage that magnetically couples the shunt trip coil to the armature, wherein the armature is mechanically coupled to the escapement assembly [140 via 144] to reversibly disconnect the contact arm [col. 4 lines 59-72]. Claim 7, Myers discloses the fused disconnect switch of claim 1, further comprising: a housing [22, 24], arranged to enclose the fuse [50] when the fuse carrier [19] is disposed in the engaged position; and a reset handle [116], extending externally to the housing, wherein the contact arm is prevented from moving to the closed position when the reset handle is moved from an open to closed position, when the fuse carrier is in a disengage position [col. 6 lines 16-21]. Claim 9, Myers discloses a disconnect module, comprising a relay module [left side of figure 2; contact switching portion]; and a fused disconnect switch [[left side of figure 2; fuse portion], for overcurrent protection, comprising: a fuse carrier [190] to house a fuse [50]; an actuator [194] configured to reversibly engage and disengage with the fuse carrier; a common trip link [140], mechanically coupled to move in concert with the actuator; and a contact arm [106], indirectly mechanically coupled to the common trip link, wherein, when the fuse carrier is disposed in an engaged position, the contact arm is free to move into a closed position to make electrical contact with a fixed contact [102], and wherein, when the fuse carrier is in a disengage position, the contact arm is prevented from moving into the closed position [col. 5 line 65 to col. 6 line 9]. Claim 10, Myers discloses the disconnect module of claim 9, wherein, when the fuse carrier [190] is moved out of the engaged position while the contact arm [106] is in contact with the fixed contact [102], the actuator is configured to trigger the common trip link to disconnect the contact arm from the fixed contact [col. 6 lines 16-21]. Claim 11, Myers discloses disconnect module of claim 9, wherein the actuator [194; figure 12] comprises a first arm [202] to engage a surface of the fuse carrier [col. 5 lines 50-54], and further comprises a second arm [201] that is biased [via 198] against the common trip link. Claim 12, Myers discloses the disconnect module of claim 11, further comprising an escapement assembly [140], coupled between the common trip link [194] and the contact arm, wherein the escapement assembly is held in an open position when the fuse carrier is in the disengage position [col. 6 lines 16-21]. Claim 14, Myers discloses disconnect module of claim 12, further comprising a shunt trip coil [130], and an armature [166], wherein the shunt trip coil is arranged to receive an external voltage that magnetically couples the shunt trip coil to the armature, wherein the armature is mechanically coupled to the escapement assembly [140 via 144] to reversibly disconnect the contact arm [col. 4 lines 59-72]. Claim 15, Myers discloses disconnect module of claim 9, further comprising: a housing [22, 24], arranged to enclose the fuse [50] when the fuse carrier [19] is disposed in the engaged position; and a reset handle [116], extending externally to the housing, wherein the contact arm is prevented from moving to the closed position when the reset handle is moved from an open to closed position, when the fuse carrier is in a disengage position [col. 6 lines 16-21]. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the later invention in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art against the later invention. Claims 8 and 16 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Ball [US 2023/0245836]. Claim 8, Ball discloses the fused disconnect switch of claim 1, the fuse carrier further comprising: a visual indication of the state of the fuse [24; paragraph 0082] but fails to specifically teach a resistor; a light bulb; and a light pipe, arranged to generate an indicator signal when a fuse in the fuse carrier is blown. It would have been an obvious matter of design to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to construct the visual indicator from a resistor; a light bulb; and a light pipe as Ball is silent on the details of the visual indicator and the recited elements are well known, since applicant has not disclosed that a visual indicator comprising a resistor; a light bulb; and a light pipe solves any stated problem or is for any particular purpose and it appears that the invention would perform equally well with visual indicator of Ball [paragraph 0082]. Claim 16, Ball discloses the module of claim 9, the fuse carrier further comprising: a visual indication of the state of the fuse [24; paragraph 0082] but fails to specifically teach a resistor; a light bulb; and a light pipe, arranged to generate an indicator signal when a fuse in the fuse carrier is blown. It would have been an obvious matter of design to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to construct the visual indicator from a resistor; a light bulb; and a light pipe as Ball is silent on the details of the visual indicator and the recited elements are well known, since applicant has not disclosed that a visual indicator comprising a resistor; a light bulb; and a light pipe solves any stated problem or is for any particular purpose and it appears that the invention would perform equally well with visual indicator of Ball [paragraph 0082]. Allowable Subject Matter Claim 17 is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Bernard Rojas whose telephone number is (571)272-1998. The examiner can normally be reached Mon. thru Fri. 7:00 am - 4:00 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Shawki S Ismail can be reached at (571) 272-3985. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /BERNARD ROJAS/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2837
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 22, 2024
Application Filed
May 13, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
Jul 06, 2026
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12683106
Rotary-Segment Electromechanical System with Reluctance Boost
2y 12m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12675126
OPERATION MECHANISM AND INPUT DEVICE
2y 6m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12671048
ELECTROMAGNETIC RELAY
2y 4m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12658394
SAFETY SWITCH
2y 10m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12640297
MAGNETIC POSITIONING HOLDER
2y 3m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
83%
Grant Probability
91%
With Interview (+7.7%)
2y 6m (~1m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1304 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month