Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/584,891

WEARABLE MONITORING DEVICE

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Feb 22, 2024
Examiner
GETZOW, SCOTT M
Art Unit
3792
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Masimo Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 0m
To Grant
81%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 80% — above average
80%
Career Allow Rate
864 granted / 1073 resolved
+10.5% vs TC avg
Minimal +0% lift
Without
With
+0.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
41 currently pending
Career history
1114
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.6%
-37.4% vs TC avg
§103
49.9%
+9.9% vs TC avg
§102
14.6%
-25.4% vs TC avg
§112
14.2%
-25.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1073 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Objections Claims 40,45 are objected to because of the following informalities: see below. Appropriate correction is required. In claim 40, line 2, the word ‘second’ should be inserted before the word ‘temperature’. In claim 45, the word ‘one’ should be inserted after the word ‘any’ to clarify that claim 45 only depends from one other claim at a time. Further, claim 45 is set forth as depending from claims 1-44. However, claims 1-27 have been cancelled. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 Claim(s) 28-33,39,40 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Telfort et al (2023/0087671). 28. (Original) A wearable device comprising: a dock comprising one or more substrates configured to be secured to skin of a subject; (see at least figure 3a of Telfort that shows a dock 200 with substrates for attaching to skin) a hub (see at least figure 3a of Telfort that shows hub 300) configured to be removably secured to the dock, the hub comprising: a housing comprising an interior, a top portion, a bottom portion, and an opening extending through said bottom portion, said bottom portion positioned closer to the subject's skin when the hub and dock are secured to one another and the dock is secured to the subject's skin; (see at least figure 5g ,5h,5T of Telfort) a circuit board arranged within the interior of the housing, the circuit board comprising a first surface, a second surface, and at least one hole extending through the circuit board between the first and second surfaces; (see at least figures 5k,5l of Telfort) one or more hardware processors coupled to the circuit board and arranged within the interior of housing; (see at least ¶7 of Telfort) a temperature sensor mounted to the first surface of the circuit board adjacent said at least one hole; (see at least ¶70 of Telfort) a thermally conductive probe extending through said opening of the housing, the thermally conductive probe comprising a first end and a second end opposite the first end, the first end positioned adjacent the second surface of the circuit board and said at least one hole; (see at least ¶72 of Telfort) a wall (300c of figure 5T) extending outward from the bottom portion (331 of figure 5T) of the housing and extending around at least a portion of the thermally conductive probe; (figure 5T shows the wall 300c extending around the thermally conductive probes 344a,344b) wherein, when the hub and the dock are secured to one another and the dock is secured to the subject's skin: (see at least abstract of Telfort) the second end of the thermally conductive probe contacts at least one of said one or more substrates of the dock; (see at least ¶135 of Telfort) the thermally conductive probe is configured to receive thermal energy emanating from the subject's skin through the one or more substrates and transmit said thermal energy towards said temperature sensor via the at least one hole of the circuit board. (see at least ¶135 of Telfort) 29. (Original) The wearable device of Claim 28, wherein the hub further comprises a battery coupled to the circuit board and arranged within the interior of the housing. (see at least ¶27 of Telfort) 30. (Original) The wearable device of Claim 28, wherein the wall surrounds an entire cross-section of the thermally conductive probe. (see at least figure 5T) 31. (Original) The wearable device of Claim 28, wherein the wall surrounds an entire perimeter of the thermally conductive probe. (see at least figure 5T) 32. (Original) The wearable device of Claim 28, wherein the wall encircles the thermally conductive probe. (see at least figure 5T) 33. (Original) The wearable device of Claim 28, wherein the thermally conductive probe extends beyond the wall. (see figure 5 and ¶77) 39. (Original) The wearable device of Claim 33, wherein said temperature sensor is a first temperature sensor of the wearable device, and wherein the wearable device further comprises a second temperature sensor mounted to the first surface of the circuit board spaced from the first temperature sensor. (see at least ¶70 which teaches first and second temperature sensors) 40. (Original) The wearable device of Claim 39, wherein the one or more processors are configured to receive one or more signals from the first and temperature sensors and determine a body temperature of the subject based on said received signals. (see at least ¶7 which teaches multiple processors connected to the multiple temperature sensors) Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 Claim(s) 34-38 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Telfort et al (2023/0087671). 34. (Original) The wearable device of Claim 33, wherein less than about 30% of a length of the thermally conductive probe extends beyond the wall. (Telfort is silent as to this feature. However, the ordinarily skilled artisan is expected to experiment to determine the dimensions of the probe in order to provide the best sensing capability for the particular patient, yielding predictable results. "[W]here the general conditions of a claim are disclosed in the prior art, it is not inventive to discover the optimum or workable ranges by routine experimentation." In re Aller, 220 F.2d 454, 456, 105 USPQ 233, 235 (CCPA 1955) 35. (Original) The wearable device of Claim 33, wherein the thermally conductive probe extends beyond the wall an amount that is less than about 1.5 mm. (Telfort is silent as to this feature. However, the ordinarily skilled artisan is expected to experiment to determine the dimensions of the probe in order to provide the best sensing capability for the particular patient, yielding predictable results. "[W]here the general conditions of a claim are disclosed in the prior art, it is not inventive to discover the optimum or workable ranges by routine experimentation." In re Aller, 220 F.2d 454, 456, 105 USPQ 233, 235 (CCPA 1955) 36. (Original)The wearable device of Claim 33, wherein the thermally conductive probe extends beyond the wall an amount that is between about 0.2 mm and about 1.5 mm. (Telfort is silent as to this feature. However, the ordinarily skilled artisan is expected to experiment to determine the dimensions of the probe in order to provide the best sensing capability for the particular patient, yielding predictable results. "[W]here the general conditions of a claim are disclosed in the prior art, it is not inventive to discover the optimum or workable ranges by routine experimentation." In re Aller, 220 F.2d 454, 456, 105 USPQ 233, 235 (CCPA 1955) 37. (Original) The wearable device of Claim 33, wherein the wall is cylindrical and the thermally conductive probe is cylindrical. (at least figure 5t shows cylindrical temperature probes. Further, although not clear from the drawings of Telfort, to make the Wall cylindrical would have been obvious since it would allow for the wall to surround the probe, so that the probe can extend therefrom, in a predictable manner) 38. (Original) The wearable device of Claim 33, wherein a gap between the thermally conductive probe and the wall is between about 0.2 mm and about 1.5 mm. (Telfort is silent as to this feature. However, the ordinarily skilled artisan is expected to experiment to determine the dimensions of the probe in order to provide the best sensing capability for the particular patient, yielding predictable results. "[W]here the general conditions of a claim are disclosed in the prior art, it is not inventive to discover the optimum or workable ranges by routine experimentation." In re Aller, 220 F.2d 454, 456, 105 USPQ 233, 235 (CCPA 1955) Claim(s) 41,42,45 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Telfort et al (2023/0087671) and Banet et al (2020/0054246). 41. (Original) The wearable device of Claim 28, further comprising: a plurality of electrodes for monitoring cardiac activity of the subject; and a plurality of cables configured to facilitate electrical communication between the plurality of electrodes and the circuit board of the hub via an electrical connection between the dock and the hub when the hub and the dock are secured to one another. (at least ¶67 and figure 1 of Banet teach electrodes and cables. It would have been obvious to use the electrodes and cable since it would provide ECG signals and thus a more complete picture of the patient’s health in a predictable manner.) 42. (Original) The wearable device of Claim 41, wherein the dock further comprises a circuit layer, and wherein said plurality of cables are configured to facilitate electrical communication between the plurality of electrodes and the circuit layer. (it is considered to have been obvious to connect the cable of Banet to the circuit board of Telfort since that is where the processors are located to process the signals from the electrodes, as is well known in the art.) 45. (Original) A system comprising any of the wearable devices of Claims 1-44 and a charging device. (As mentioned supra, Telfort teaches all of the subject matter of claims 28-32 except for a charging device. Banet teaches rechargeable batteries, and thus inherently a charging device that can charge them, see at least ¶143. Claim(s) 43,44 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Telfort et al (2023/0087671) and Banet et al (2020/0054246), and further in view of Arne et al (2015/0248833). 43. (Original) The wearable device of Claim 41, wherein said plurality of electrodes are external electrodes configured to be secured to the subject's skin away from the dock, and wherein the wearable device further comprises at least one internal electrode operably positioned by the dock. (see at least figure 1 of Banet. Further, Arne teaches at least one internal electrode, see at least figure 4 and ¶30 which teach electrodes 114a,114b. It would have been obvious to use the internal electrodes of Arne with the device of Telfort since it would allow for more parameters to be sensed, and thus more complete evaluation of the patient, in a predictable manner) 44. (Original) The wearable device of Claim 43, wherein the wearable device comprises two internal electrodes spaced from one another and operably positioned by the dock. (see at least figure 4 of Arne. When combined with Telfort, the electrode of Arne will be positioned by the dock so that they can be adhered to the patient) Claim(s) 46 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Telfort et al (2023/0087671) and Banet et al (2020/0054246), and further in view of Al-Ali et al (2020/0321793). 46. (Original) The system of Claim 45, wherein the charging device comprises a plurality of charging cavities, each of the plurality of charging cavities configured to receive at least a portion of the hub and charge a battery of the hub. (Al-Ali teaches a charging device with cavities, see at least figure 10A and ¶534-536. It would have been obvious to use such a charging device with the device of Telfort since it would allow for recharging the rechargeable batteries in a convenient and predictable manner) Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Scott M. Getzow whose telephone number is (571)272-4946. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9-5. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Benjamin Klein can be reached at 571-270-5213. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Scott M. Getzow/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3792
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 22, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 27, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12599772
Selection of Sensing Electrodes in a Spinal Cord Stimulator System Using Sensed Stimulation Artifacts
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12582817
USE OF ELECTRICALLY CONDUCTIVE MATERIALS FOR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12582823
FLEXIBLE STIMULATION PATTERNING FRAMEWORK
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12569188
DEEP SOUND STIMULATION SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR SLEEP REGULATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12569397
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR LASER TREATMENT OF A DERMATOLOGIC CONDITION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
81%
With Interview (+0.2%)
3y 0m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1073 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month