Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/585,282

DATA PROCESSING METHOD AND APPARATUS

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Feb 23, 2024
Examiner
KIM, CHONG G
Art Unit
2443
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Shenzhen Yinwang Intelligent Technologies Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
83%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 11m
To Grant
87%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 83% — above average
83%
Career Allow Rate
352 granted / 424 resolved
+25.0% vs TC avg
Minimal +4% lift
Without
With
+4.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
44 currently pending
Career history
468
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
12.0%
-28.0% vs TC avg
§103
35.8%
-4.2% vs TC avg
§102
36.3%
-3.7% vs TC avg
§112
12.2%
-27.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 424 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claims 1-28 are subject to examination and rejected. Specification The title of the invention is not descriptive. A new title is required that is clearly indicative of the invention to which the claims are directed. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-28 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Falla Cepeda (US PGPub 2022/0345859). Regarding claims 1 and 15, Falla Cepeda teaches a method (Falla Cepeda, see abstract, building single-path communication signal map data for road link), comprising: obtaining coverage information of a roadside device, wherein the coverage information comprises coverage region information that indicates at least one coverage region of the roadside device (Falla Cepeda, see paragraph 0035, the system 100 can use regular vehicle(s) (e.g., vehicles 103 a, 103 b) with standard 5G communication interfaces/modules to measure and assess the coverage, capacity and quality of service (QoS) of a 5G access point (e.g., the 5G access point 102)) and coverage capability information that indicates a coverage capability of the roadside device in the at least one coverage region (Falla Cepeda, see paragraph 0111, the signal coverage options 705 includes a 5G option 705 a, a 4G option 705 b, and a no-coverage option 705 c); and storing the coverage information as map data (Falla Cepeda, see paragraph 0111, Referring to FIG. 7A, in one embodiment, the system 100 can generate a user interface (UI) 701 (e.g., via the mapping platform 107) for a UE 111 (e.g., a mobile device, a smartphone, a client terminal, etc.) that can allow a user (e.g., a mapping service provider staff, a vehicle fleet operator staff, an end user, etc.) to see vehicle sensor data, single-path communication signal characteristics data, road-link map attribute data, filtered road-link map attribute data, single-path communication coverage information, quality of service measurement data, etc. currently and/or over time (e.g., an hour, a day, a week, a month, a year, etc.) in an area presented over a map 703). Regarding claims 2 and 16, Falla Cepeda teaches wherein the at least one coverage region is classified by level based on the coverage capability in the at least one coverage region (Falla Cepeda, see paragraph 0111, the signal coverage options 705 includes a 5G option 705 a, a 4G option 705 b, and a no-coverage option 705 c). Regarding claims 3 and 17, Falla Cepeda teaches wherein the at least one coverage region comprises M communication coverage regions and N sensing coverage regions, M and N are natural numbers, and M and N are not simultaneously 0 (Falla Cepeda, see paragraph 0111, Referring to FIG. 7A, in one embodiment, the system 100 can generate a user interface (UI) 701 (e.g., via the mapping platform 107) for a UE 111 (e.g., a mobile device, a smartphone, a client terminal, etc.) that can allow a user (e.g., a mapping service provider staff, a vehicle fleet operator staff, an end user, etc.) to see vehicle sensor data, single-path communication signal characteristics data, road-link map attribute data, filtered road-link map attribute data, single-path communication coverage information, quality of service measurement data, etc. currently and/or over time (e.g., an hour, a day, a week, a month, a year, etc.) in an area presented over a map 703). Regarding claims 4 and 18, Falla Cepeda teaches wherein the N sensing coverage regions comprise a multi-device sensing coverage region, and the multi-device sensing coverage region and a coverage capability of the roadside device in the multi-device sensing coverage region are determined based on coverage capabilities of a plurality of sensing devices related to the roadside device (Falla Cepeda, see paragraph 0111, Referring to FIG. 7A, in one embodiment, the system 100 can generate a user interface (UI) 701 (e.g., via the mapping platform 107) for a UE 111 (e.g., a mobile device, a smartphone, a client terminal, etc.) that can allow a user (e.g., a mapping service provider staff, a vehicle fleet operator staff, an end user, etc.) to see vehicle sensor data, single-path communication signal characteristics data, road-link map attribute data, filtered road-link map attribute data, single-path communication coverage information, quality of service measurement data, etc. currently and/or over time (e.g., an hour, a day, a week, a month, a year, etc.) in an area presented over a map 703). Regarding claims 5 and 19, Falla Cepeda teaches wherein the roadside device is related to a first sensing device and a second sensing device, the N sensing coverage regions comprise a first coverage region of the first sensing device and a second coverage region of the second sensing device, and the coverage capability information comprises first coverage capability information that indicates a coverage capability of the first sensing device in the first coverage region and second coverage capability information that indicates a coverage capability of the second sensing device in the second coverage region (Falla Cepeda, see paragraph 0111, Referring to FIG. 7A, in one embodiment, the system 100 can generate a user interface (UI) 701 (e.g., via the mapping platform 107) for a UE 111 (e.g., a mobile device, a smartphone, a client terminal, etc.) that can allow a user (e.g., a mapping service provider staff, a vehicle fleet operator staff, an end user, etc.) to see vehicle sensor data, single-path communication signal characteristics data, road-link map attribute data, filtered road-link map attribute data, single-path communication coverage information, quality of service measurement data, etc. currently and/or over time (e.g., an hour, a day, a week, a month, a year, etc.) in an area presented over a map 703). Regarding claims 6 and 20, Falla Cepeda teaches wherein the coverage information further comprises information that indicates a dead zone, and the dead zone comprises at least one of a communication dead zone, and a sensing dead zone (Falla Cepeda, see paragraph 0113, the system 100 also determines based on 5G coverage information as discussed that the fastest route 717 includes a 5G-dead road link 723 (e.g., caused by an obstruction 725). In this case, the system 100 presents a notification 727 of “Warning! A 5G dead road link along route.”). Regarding claims 7 and 21, Falla Cepeda teaches wherein, when the coverage capability is a coverage capability of the roadside device in a communication coverage region, the coverage capability information indicates at least one of: a data accuracy rate, a packet loss rate, a communication delay, communication stability, and signal strength (Falla Cepeda, see paragraph 0121, a road-link map attributes can additionally include one or more attributes such as: (1) 5G communication provider ID, (2) signal strength, (3) estimated distance from an access point, (4) azimuth angle from the access point, (5) elevation angle from the access point, (6) time, etc). Regarding claims 8 and 22, Falla Cepeda teaches wherein, when the coverage capability is a coverage capability of the roadside device in a sensing coverage region, the coverage capability information indicates at least one of: a sensing result accuracy rate, a false detection rate, a missing detection rate, a recall rate, sensing precision, detection stability, and detection location precision (Falla Cepeda, see paragraph 0121, a road-link map attributes can additionally include one or more attributes such as: (1) 5G communication provider ID, (2) signal strength, (3) estimated distance from an access point, (4) azimuth angle from the access point, (5) elevation angle from the access point, (6) time, etc). Regarding claims 9 and 23, Falla Cepeda teaches wherein the coverage capability information indicates coverage capabilities in a plurality of environments (Falla Cepeda, see paragraph 0121, a road-link map attributes can additionally include one or more attributes such as: (1) 5G communication provider ID, (2) signal strength, (3) estimated distance from an access point, (4) azimuth angle from the access point, (5) elevation angle from the access point, (6) time, etc). Regarding claims 10 and 24, Falla Cepeda teaches wherein the coverage information further comprises an identifier of the roadside device (Falla Cepeda, see paragraph 0040, Each road link in a road network can be assigned with a unique identifier (e.g., a road link ID) in a map database (e.g., a geographic database 121) for use in reporting or transmitting map data, navigation data, traffic data, the 5G signal data collected by the vehicles 103, etc). Regarding claims 11 and 25, Falla Cepeda teaches wherein the coverage information further comprises a tile identifier (Falla Cepeda, see paragraph 0040, Each road link in a road network can be assigned with a unique identifier (e.g., a road link ID) in a map database (e.g., a geographic database 121) for use in reporting or transmitting map data, navigation data, traffic data, the 5G signal data collected by the vehicles 103, etc). Regarding claims 12 and 26, Falla Cepeda teaches further comprising: displaying the coverage information on a display interface (Falla Cepeda, see paragraph 0040, Each road link in a road network can be assigned with a unique identifier (e.g., a road link ID) in a map database (e.g., a geographic database 121) for use in reporting or transmitting map data, navigation data, traffic data, the 5G signal data collected by the vehicles 103, etc). Regarding claims 13 and 27, Falla Cepeda teaches further comprising: sending the coverage information (Falla Cepeda, see paragraph 0040, Each road link in a road network can be assigned with a unique identifier (e.g., a road link ID) in a map database (e.g., a geographic database 121) for use in reporting or transmitting map data, navigation data, traffic data, the 5G signal data collected by the vehicles 103, etc). Regarding claims 14 and 28, Falla Cepeda teaches further comprising: performing information processing or generating a control signal for controlling a vehicle, based on the coverage information (Falla Cepeda, see figure 7A and 7B). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CHONG G KIM whose telephone number is (571)270-0619. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri @ 9am - 5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Nicholas R. Taylor can be reached at 571-272-3889. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CHONG G KIM/Examiner, Art Unit 2443 /NICHOLAS R TAYLOR/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2443
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 23, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 28, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12587409
A2B CABLE LENGTH DETECTION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12581318
NETWORK TOPOLOGY FOR EFFICIENT AND PERFORMANT VIRTUAL WANS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12574978
METHODS FOR CONNECTION ORIENTED DATA TRANSFER FOR ULTRA-WIDEBAND SYSTEMS AND APPARATUSES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12563428
METHOD FOR SHARING MEASUREMENT GAP
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12557167
METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR INACTIVE STATE INITIAL UPLINK TRANSMISSION USING PRE-CONFIGURED GRANT AT A BASE STATION IN WIRELESS COMMUNICATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
83%
Grant Probability
87%
With Interview (+4.2%)
2y 11m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 424 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month