Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 18/586,586

BATTERY PACK

Non-Final OA §103§112
Filed
Feb 26, 2024
Priority
Mar 29, 2023 — JP 2023-053304
Examiner
BERRESFORD, JORDAN ELIZABETH
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Honda Motor Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
69%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
7m
Est. Remaining
78%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 69% — above average
69%
Career Allowance Rate
123 granted / 178 resolved
+9.1% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+8.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
33 currently pending
Career history
207
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
52.3%
+12.3% vs TC avg
§102
24.1%
-15.9% vs TC avg
§112
22.9%
-17.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 178 resolved cases

Office Action

§103 §112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosures statements (IDSs) submitted 02/26/2024 and 04/01/2025 were received and have been considered by the examiner. Drawings The drawings submitted 02/26/2024 were received and are approved by the examiner. Specification The title of the invention is not descriptive. A new title is required that is clearly indicative of the invention to which the claims are directed. The following title is suggested: Battery Pack Comprising Tapered Cross Members. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 4 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. The term “vicinity” in claim 4 is a relative term which renders the claim indefinite. The term “vicinity” is not defined by the claim, the specification does not provide a standard for ascertaining the requisite degree, and one of ordinary skill in the art would not be reasonably apprised of the scope of the invention. Due to the use of the term, the location of the temperature sensor relative to the pressure relief valve is indefinite. For purpose of examination, so long as a temperature sensor is near a same surface as a pressure relief valve, it will read on claim 4. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claim(s) 1-3 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Shimazaki et al. (U.S. 20200075907) in view of Foran (U.S. 20220006150). PNG media_image1.png 672 637 media_image1.png Greyscale With respect to claims 1-2, Shimazaki discloses a battery pack (17) that accommodates a plurality of battery modules (34) in which a plurality of battery cells are stacked (Fig. 7), the battery pack (17) comprising: a lower case (31 – case main body) that covers lower portions of the plurality of battery modules (34) (Fig. 7); and an upper cover (32) that covers upper portions of the plurality of battery modules (34) (Fig. 7), wherein the lower case (31) includes: a bottom plate (31a – case bottom wall) that covers the lower portions of the plurality of battery modules (34) (Fig. 7); a front wall (31b) that stands upward and extends in a left-right direction at a front portion of the bottom plate (31a) (Fig. 7); a rear wall (31c) that stands upward and extends in the left-right direction at a rear portion of the bottom plate (31a) (Fig. 7); a left wall (31d – left) that stands upward and extends in a front-rear direction at a left portion of the bottom plate (31a) (Fig. 7); and a right wall (31d – right) that stands upward and extends in the front-rear direction at a right portion of the bottom plate (31a) (Fig. 7), the plurality of battery modules (34) are disposed in a battery module accommodating portion 31g and 31f – front and rear battery chambers) surrounded by the bottom plate (31a), the front wall (31b), the rear wall (31c), the left wall (31d), and the right wall (31d) (Fig. 7), the lower case (31) is provided with: a cross member (31e) that stands upward from the bottom plate (31a) and extends in the left-right direction continuously from the left wall (31d) to the right wall (31d) in the battery module accommodating portion (31f and 31g) (Fig. 7), and a cover frame (labeled) that covers at least a part of an upper portion of the cross member (31e) and extends in the left-right direction (Fig. 5 – below), the cross member is made of a solid-structured metal (case main body 31 made by metal die-casting/aluminum die-casting ([0030]; thus reading on claim 2) and extends in the left-right direction such that a position of an upper end thereof is lowered from both left and right ends toward a left-right direction central portion (Fig. 7 – above), and the cover frame (labeled) is fixed to the cross member (31e) (via bolt 45) (Fig. 5 – below). [AltContent: arrow] PNG media_image2.png 393 725 media_image2.png Greyscale Shimazaki does not disclose the cover frame is formed of a metal plate member, specifically iron. Foran discloses cross members (66) for a battery lower case (80 – shield) with cover frame (29 – divider walls) (Fig. 1 and Fig. 3) and teaches the cover frame is made of iron (as it is part of tray 20; [0068]). Foran further teaches that the iron function as an EMI0RFI shielding filler so as to function as a Faraday cage (I.e. blocking electromagnetic fields) ([0068]). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time that the application was effectively filed to ensure the cover frame disclosed by Shimazaki was made of iron as taught by Foran in order for it to help block electromagnetic fields. With respect to claim 3, modified Shimazaki discloses the plurality of battery modules (34) are aligned in the front-rear direction in the battery module accommodating portion (31f and 31g) (Fig. 7), the cross member (31e) extends in the left-right direction between the battery modules (34) aligned in the front-rear direction (Fig. 7), the cover frame (labeled) extends in the left-right direction between the battery modules (34) aligned in the front-rear direction (Fig. 5 – above), and an upper end of the cover frame (labeled) extends in the left-right direction at a height equal to or higher (shown by dashed line) than an upper end of each battery module (34) (Fig. 5 – above). Claim 4 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Shimazaki in view of Foran as applied to claim 3 above, and further in view of Gonring (U.S. 20220328912). With respect to claim 4, modified Shimazaki discloses a battery pack (see above rejection of claims 1-3), but does not disclose the presence of pressure relief valve and a temperature sensor. Gonring discloses a battery pack (200 – batter enclosure) and teaches the battery pack (200) comprises: a pressure release valve (212) that enables gas to be discharges to outside of the battery pack (200) from a battery pack internal space (Fig. 2; [0031]); and a temperature sensor (206) that is provided in the battery pack (200) internal space (204 – sealed enclosure volume) and configured to detect a temperature inside the internal space (204) (Fig. 2; [0029]), wherein the pressure release valve (212) is concentrated at a front or rear (left) of the battery pack (200) (Fig. 2), and the temperature sensor (206) is disposed in the vicinity of the pressure relief valve (212) (Fig. 2). Gonring further teaches this configuration detects temperature information within the interior space ([0029]), and responds to an excess of pressure outside of a pressure safety threshold within the internal space ([0031]). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time that the application was effectively filed to include a pressure release valve and temperature sensor as taught by Gonring to the battery pack disclosed by modified Shimazaki in order to detect temperature information within the interior space and respond to an excess of pressure outside of a pressure safety threshold within the internal space. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JORDAN E BERRESFORD whose telephone number is (571)272-0641. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8:00 am - 5:00 pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Barbara Gilliam can be reached at (572)272-1330. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /J.E.B./Examiner, Art Unit 1727 /BARBARA L GILLIAM/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 1727
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 26, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 23, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12689044
HUMIDIFIER FOR FUEL CELL
3y 0m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12676379
BATTERY PACK AND OUTPUT END PROTECTION SUPPORT
3y 8m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12633613
BATTERY RACK, ENERGY STORAGE SYSTEM, AND POWER GENERATION SYSTEM
3y 2m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12626987
BATTERY MODULE, AND BATTERY PACK AND AUTOMOBILE INCLUDING SAME
3y 3m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12603372
BATTERY RACK, ENERGY STORAGE SYSTEM, AND POWER GENERATION SYSTEM
3y 1m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
69%
Grant Probability
78%
With Interview (+8.4%)
3y 1m (~7m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 178 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month