Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/587,041

MONITORING SYSTEM FOR PERSONNEL DELIVERY DEVICE AND PERSONNEL DELIVERY DEVICE

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Feb 26, 2024
Examiner
RUSHIN, LESTER III
Art Unit
3651
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Kone Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
88%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 0m
To Grant
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 88% — above average
88%
Career Allow Rate
609 granted / 694 resolved
+35.8% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+8.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 0m
Avg Prosecution
8 currently pending
Career history
702
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.8%
-39.2% vs TC avg
§103
48.4%
+8.4% vs TC avg
§102
35.1%
-4.9% vs TC avg
§112
14.6%
-25.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 694 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-6 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by CN205793042 to Tian. With respect to claim 1, Tian discloses a monitoring system (Fig. 1) for a personnel delivery device, which is characterized in that the monitoring system comprises: a support member arranged on the personnel delivery device (see numerals 8, 12, 13, 14 in Fig. 1, see annotated Fig. 1 below and page 2 of the translated Description under “Detailed ways”, second paragraph, lines 5-7): PNG media_image1.png 348 318 media_image1.png Greyscale wherein the support member is provided with a hanging part (8) above a personnel delivery unit; a detection device (see numerals 5, 6, 7 in Fig. 1 and page 2 of the translated Description under “Detailed ways”, second paragraph, lines 4-5), arranged in the hanging part (8) of the support member, and comprising: a first camera (5), installed in the hanging part; a second camera (7), installed in the hanging part, wherein, a center line of a lens of the first camera and a center line of a lens of the second camera are symmetrical with respect to a center line of the personnel delivery unit of the personnel delivery device along a running direction ( this is implicit in Fig. 2 considering the perspective in Fig. 1). With respect to claim 2, Tian discloses is characterized in that the detection device further comprises a fixing member arranged in the hanging part, and the first camera is pivotally installed to the fixing member through a first mounting seat and is able to pivot within a first predetermined angle range to adjust an observation range of the first camera ([0013]). With respect to claim 3, Tian discloses is characterized in that the second camera is pivotally installed to the fixing member through a second mounting seat and is able to pivot within a second predetermined angle range to adjust an observation range of the second camera ([0013]). With respect to claim 4, Tian discloses is characterized in that the observation range of the first camera and the observation range of the second camera partially overlap to form an overlapping area, and a height of the overlapping area in a vertical direction is greater than a height of an object to be observed Given the height of the cameras over the personal delivery device there is some partial overlap (see annotated Fig. 1 below): PNG media_image2.png 670 844 media_image2.png Greyscale With respect to claim 5, Tian discloses is characterized in that the first camera and the second camera are configured such that an optical axis of the lens of the first camera and an optical axis of the lens of the second camera form an angle with each other (see annotated Fig. 1 below): PNG media_image3.png 670 844 media_image3.png Greyscale With respect to claim 6, Tian discloses is characterized in that the first camera and the second camera are configured such that the angle formed by the optical axis of the lens of the first camera and the optical axis of the lens of the second camera changes within a predetermined range through pivoting of the first camera and the second camera (It is implicit that an angle between the optic axis of the cameras will change they move). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 7-19 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: The prior art does not teach or disclose a monitoring system for personnel delivery that has the structure claimed for fixing cameras and camera support structures as claimed. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to LESTER RUSHIN, III whose telephone number is (313)446-4905. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 7:30-4p. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, GENE CRAWFORD can be reached at 571-272-6911. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /LESTER RUSHIN, III/ Examiner Art Unit 3651 /GENE O CRAWFORD/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3651
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 26, 2024
Application Filed
Mar 03, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102
Mar 25, 2026
Interview Requested
Apr 01, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Apr 01, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12600575
Conveyor Device
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12595138
SYSTEM FOR SEPARATING BULK-SUPPLIED PLANT-BULBS AND METHOD FOR TRANSPORTING AND SPACING PLANT-BULBS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12595133
Conveyor belt calibration device
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12589958
MODULAR BASE FOR DRIVING CONVEYORS AND RELATED COMPONENTS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12583682
CONVEYOR ARRANGEMENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
88%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+8.0%)
2y 0m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 694 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month