Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026
Application No. 18/587,538

DEPLOYMENT FRAME FOR COMBINING MULTIPLE ARTIFICIAL REEFS

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Feb 26, 2024
Priority
Feb 24, 2023 — provisional 63/447,922
Examiner
VALENTI, ANDREA M
Art Unit
3643
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Qatar University
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
43%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
5m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 43% of resolved cases
43%
Career Allowance Rate
319 granted / 749 resolved
-9.4% vs TC avg
Strong +57% interview lift
Without
With
+57.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
26 currently pending
Career history
789
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.0%
-39.0% vs TC avg
§103
54.2%
+14.2% vs TC avg
§102
20.7%
-19.3% vs TC avg
§112
16.6%
-23.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 749 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-8 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Japanese Patent JP 2005040062 to Yamaguchi. Regarding Claims 1 and 5, Yamaguchi teaches a method of assembling a reef frame and the structure of a reef frame (Yamaguchi Fig. 10 #1), comprising: a frame structure comprising a plurality of interconnected beams; a plurality of deployment hooks (Yamaguchi Fig. 10 #2) directly connected to the frame structure, and configured to releasably connect to a plurality of articles (Yamaguchi Fig. 10 #21); and a plurality of buoys (Yamaguchi Fig. 10 #24), wherein each buoy of the plurality of buoys is attached to a respective deployment hook of the plurality of deployment hooks, wherein each of the plurality of deployment hooks is to be attached to a respective link (Yamaguchi Fig. 10 #19) of each of the plurality of articles. Regarding Claims 2 and 6, Yamaguchi teaches the plurality of interconnected beams of the frame structure are made of steel (Yamaguchi first paragraph of English Translation Mode-for-invention). Regarding Claims 3 and 7, Yamaguchi teaches the frame structure defines a square (Yamaguchi Fig. 1 #1; Fig. 2 #5) layout, or a circular layout. Regarding Claims 4 and 8, Yamaguchi teaches the frame structure comprises at least one attachment link (Yamaguchi Fig. 11 and 13 #30) configured to attach to a crane, a lift, or a hoist (Applicant doesn’t positively claim the crane, lift of hoist, the structure of Yamaguchi #30 is a link configured to attach). Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 1-8 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Applicant's arguments are more detailed than the claims themselves. When determining patentability, the limitations of the claims are evaluated and not the distinct advantages as argued by applicant. Currently, the limitations of the claims do not distinguish. In addition, the claimed invention must result in a structural difference between the claimed invention and the prior art in order to patentably distinguish the claimed invention from the prior art. For example, applicant doesn’t claim open ended hooks. The examiner maintains that applicant hasn't patentably distinguished over the prior art of record. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ANDREA M VALENTI whose telephone number is (571)272-6895. The examiner can normally be reached Available Monday and Tuesday only, eastern time. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Peter Poon can be reached at 571-272-6891. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ANDREA M VALENTI/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3643 21 July 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 26, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 18, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
Nov 26, 2025
Response Filed
Feb 25, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102
Apr 08, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Apr 26, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jul 23, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12733629
BIRD FEEDER
4y 11m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12721323
LIGHTING SYSTEM FOR POULTRY HOUSES
2y 6m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12677807
MULTI-FUNCTION DEVICE FOR INTENSIVE SHRIMP FARMING, INTENSIVE SHRIP FARMING POND USING THIS DEVICE AND METHOD FOR OPERATING THIS POND
2y 1m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12660768
METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR CAPABLE OF SELECTING OPTIMAL PLANT CULTIVATION METHOD
3y 4m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12660790
MANURE HANDLING SYSTEM FOR USE IN BARNS
2y 3m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
43%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+57.4%)
3y 0m (~5m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 749 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month